[OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] Feedback requested for tox job definition
Paul Belanger
pabelanger at redhat.com
Wed Mar 8 15:33:06 UTC 2017
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:20:23AM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Allow me to bring to your attention a series of patches which create our first
> zuulv3 jobs. Specifically, we are looking to discuss what a generic tox job in
> ansible will look like.
>
> Currently, we have 2 proposed patches for zuul (feature/zuulv3) branch
> available:
>
> Generic tox (single playbook)
> - https://review.openstack.org/438281
>
Apologies, ^ is our multiple playbooks
> Generic tox (multi playbook)
> - https://review.openstack.org/442180
>
^ is our single playbook
> Starting with 438281, the main differences lay within the .zuul.yaml file. As
> you can see by looking at the code, we are not defining any variables (vars) in
> .zuul.yaml. This means, we create 3 separate playbooks (tox-cover.yaml,
> tox-py27, tox-linters.yaml) which then contain the variables we need for our tox
> role.
>
> With 442180, we move our tox role variables into .zuul.yaml (vars section) and
> use a single playbook (tox.yaml) as our entry point for each job.
>
> Everything else between the 2 patches is the same. So, with that in mind, which
> patch do people prefer?
>
> -PB
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
More information about the OpenStack-Infra
mailing list