Open Stack

Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu at redhat.com> writes:

>>> I also proposed a 'plugin' interface so that driver are fully contained
>>> in their namespace, which seems like another legitimate addition to this
>>> feature:
>>>  https://review.openstack.org/524620
>>
>> I think that will be a nice thing to have, but I'd like to delay it (as
>> we have for Zuul) much further into the future.  I'd like to make a
>> couple of releases where we think the internal API is stable before we
>> consider making an external API.  In the mean time, I'd like to expand
>> the set of drivers we support in-tree.
>>
> Note that this help adding test and it makes rebase easier... How about
> we keep it for the internal API without supporting out of tree drivers?

If that's the case, I think it would be fine -- as long as it's not
exposed at all (we should remove the config file setting in favor of
direct imports, for example).

-Jim