Open Stack

Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2016 8:56 PM, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org
> <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>> wrote:
>>
>> The issue with this solution is that any "monthly" slot ends up being
>> exactly the same as a "weekly" slot: you can't schedule any
>> weekly/biweekly meetings at the same time and location. Monthly meetings
>> are therefore paradoxically more wasteful than biweekly meetings, and
>> there is therefore little point in adding them to the software since you
>> can emulate them with "weekly" bookings and just skip most meetings.
> 
> That seems to be based on the assumption that other groups wouldn't want
> monthly scheduling?
> 
> Also, I'd suggest we avoid "monthly" altogether and instead use
> "4weekly", that would seem to allow biweekly meetings to use the same
> day&time on the alternate (odd/even) week.

4weekly sounds like a good idea! Less conflicts ftw.

If we really really want monthly stuff, we could create a channel
dedicated to monthly meetings, to avoid creating conflicts on every
channels.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)