Open Stack

I am happy to do that too

Inviato da iPhone

> Il giorno 02 mag 2016, alle ore 12:46, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz <ricardo.carrillo.cruz at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> I appreciate you starting this thread Paul.
> 
> Being able to collaborate with other folks from the infra team on preparing talks for confs is 
> great, and gives the chance to people who are interested in the project but are 'shy' to speak up
> alone in stage to overcome that barrier.
> 
> This will also avoid having talks with repeating topics on same/similar confs.
> 
> Looking forward to collaborate on upcoming confs :-) .
> 
> Ricky 
> 
> 2016-05-02 20:55 GMT+02:00 Spencer Krum <nibz at spencerkrum.com>:
>> I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start
>> a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate
>> attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each
>> other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel
>> any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination
>> sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear
>> to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct
>> place is something we should be careful to do.
>> 
>> We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on
>> talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time.
>> 
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the
>> > dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my
>> > personal
>> > goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other
>> > people
>> > and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come
>> > to
>> > mind.
>> >
>> > However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without
>> > giving
>> > some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our
>> > Austin
>> > talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider
>> > doing to
>> > same for other conferences?
>> >
>> > Or I am just being paranoid.
>> >
>> > PB
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>> 
>> 
>> --
>>   Spencer Krum
>>   nibz at spencerkrum.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> 
> !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346!
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20160502/63a4ea14/attachment-0001.html>