Open Stack

Good update, thanks fungi.

Just a thought, given the pain we felt yesterday when static.o.o was down,
we should consider if a log solution needs to be a priority. Using afs (or
swift) could allow us to scale static.o.o horizontally.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Store Build Logs in Swift
> > [...]
> > > We should remove the original spec from our priority list (since
> > > that's basically already ceased to be an actual priority), and
> > > probably supercede it with the AFS proposal.
> [...]
> > Additionally the urgency of this spec seems to have been reduced (due to
> > limiting the retention on logs). We should perhaps reconsider if it's a
> > priority spec or not after we've decided on a path forward.
>
> That makes sense, though I think we can agree the original spec (and
> accompanying implementation) has ceased to be treated as a priority
> so it's a bit disingenuous to leave it on our priority list.
>
> Anyway, I've pushed a cleanup/update change at
> https://review.openstack.org/331903 which:
>
>   * removes logs-in-swift
>   * replaces maniphest with task-tracker
>   * adds nodepool-zookeeper-workers due to its coupling with zuulv3
>   * updates the Gerrit query string/URL accordingly
>
> I'll put it on the meeting agenda now for formal council vote this
> week. If approved, this leaves us at 6 priority specs, so if we
> consider that we were pretty well saturated at 8 last cycle, we can
> also discuss adding a couple more we expect to be spending
> significant time on over the remainder of this cycle or whether
> sticking with those 6 is perhaps better for focusing our efforts?
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Store Build Logs in Swift
> > [...]
> > > We should remove the original spec from our priority list (since
> > > that's basically already ceased to be an actual priority), and
> > > probably supercede it with the AFS proposal.
> [...]
> > Additionally the urgency of this spec seems to have been reduced (due to
> > limiting the retention on logs). We should perhaps reconsider if it's a
> > priority spec or not after we've decided on a path forward.
>
> That makes sense, though I think we can agree the original spec (and
> accompanying implementation) has ceased to be treated as a priority
> so it's a bit disingenuous to leave it on our priority list.
>
> Anyway, I've pushed a cleanup/update change at
> https://review.openstack.org/331903 which:
>
>   * removes logs-in-swift
>   * replaces maniphest with task-tracker
>   * adds nodepool-zookeeper-workers due to its coupling with zuulv3
>   * updates the Gerrit query string/URL accordingly
>
> I'll put it on the meeting agenda now for formal council vote this
> week. If approved, this leaves us at 6 priority specs, so if we
> consider that we were pretty well saturated at 8 last cycle, we can
> also discuss adding a couple more we expect to be spending
> significant time on over the remainder of this cycle or whether
> sticking with those 6 is perhaps better for focusing our efforts?
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20160621/4f04b81a/attachment-0001.html>