Open Stack

Fridays work for me too.

Regards,
Thanh


On 5 July 2016 at 14:03, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's starting to sound like Friday would suit people best, I'm happy
> enough with that day as well, may have to leave slightly before 17hr utc,
> but should be able to be present for most of the time.
>
> Darragh Bailey
> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
> On 5 Jul 2016 17:21, "Wayne Warren" <wayne at puppet.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 July 2016 at 05:44, Kien Ha <kienha9922 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> HI Darragh,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to help where I can in the reviews, but Tuesdays and
>>>> Thursdays are my busiest days. I can only guarantee that I am free after
>>>> 19:00 UTC on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Monday and Fridays are days where I am
>>>> free from summer class obligations but I am not too sure if that will work
>>>> with everyone else.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can do Monday, assuming Friday is a little more awkward for people in
>>> European timezones as they plan to wrap up for the day earlier.
>>>
>>> Woud 13:00-1700 UTC suit on those days?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Kien Ha
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Dong Ma <winterma.dong at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Darragh,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with your thought and would like to participate to the
>>>>> reviews, although the time slots is a little late for me but it works.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Would moving the time slot an hour earlier on either Mon/Fri suit you
>>> better?
>>>
>>
>> For the proposed time slots so far, Friday would be better for me--I have
>> a team meeting I cannot miss between UTC 1530 and UTC 1630 (although it
>> usually runs a half hour short).
>>
>> However, if Monday 1300 - 1700 UTC ends up being the best time for
>> everyone else, I can attempt to split my attention between the JJB 2.0
>> review session and that meeting, or set aside dedicated time outside of the
>> review session to respond to comments and iterate on the 2.0 patches
>> (really I will want to do this anyway).
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Darragh Bailey
>>> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20160705/fe6fb8f6/attachment.html>