[OpenStack-Infra] Requesting deletion of stable/juno from murano, murano-dashboard, murano-agent and python-muranoclient
Kirill Zaitsev
kzaitsev at mirantis.com
Wed Feb 10 12:51:16 UTC 2016
Hello, thanks for mentioning this. I’ve tagged python-muranoclient’s stable/juno branch with 0.5.5.1. I’ve noticed that most clients do not follow '*-eol' convention, it’s mostly present in non-client repos. Please take a look at current state of the branch and if everything’s ok — I believe it’s safe to remove stable/juno there.
--
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano team
Software Engineer
Mirantis, Inc
On 4 February 2016 at 04:10:26, Clark Boylan (cboylan at sapwetik.org) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016, at 05:18 AM, Kirill Zaitsev wrote:
> Hello, I’d like to request deletion of stable/juno branch from murano,
> murano-dashboard, murano-agent and python-muranoclient repositories. As
> far as I know — I do not have branch deletion permissions myself.
>
> As far as I see, those branches have been tagged with EOL 2014.2.4 tag
> (0.5.5 for client), so there are no unreleased changes there. We also do
> not have any commits on the review for stable/juno, so we no longer need
> those branches.
>
> We also have discussed this
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2016/murano.2016-01-26-17.00.log.html
> in IRC meetings.
>
I have removed stable/juno from murano, murano-dashboard, and
murano-agent. I did not remove it from python-muranoclient because there
is no tag on the tip of stable/juno. Generally we tag the tips of these
branches something like 'juno-eol' as well just to be extra clear which
you may consider for the client and the other projects.
Let us know when you have properly tagged the tip of the stable/juno
branch on python-muranoclient and we can remove that branch as well.
Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20160210/50a942fb/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-Infra
mailing list