Open Stack

On 2016-12-20 10:19:26 -0800 (-0800), James E. Blair wrote:
[...]
> I think we should change the provider images section to separate out the
> parts pertaining to diskimages and those pertaining to flavors.
> Something like:
[...]
>   providers:
>     - name: cloud
>       diskimages:
>         - name: ubuntu-trusty
>           metadata:
>             foo: bar
>           labels:
>             - name: small-ubuntu-trusty
>               ram: 2g
>             - name: large-ubuntu-trusty
>               ram: 8g
[...]
> Does this sound like a reasonable path forward?

I have a strong preference for the proposed model, as it still
allows for differing label-to-flavor mapping per provider while
simplifying the relationship between providers, images and flavors
compared to the old nodepool~=0.3 implementation.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley