Open Stack

On 03/30/2015 06:22 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:53:51AM -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> On 03/30/2015 03:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>>> We noticed last week that bashate was not part of any project in the
>>>> governance repo and wondered on IRC which other repositories are
>>>> orphaned - meaning added in one of the openstack namespaces but not
>>>> mentioned in governance/reference/.
>>>
>>> Yes, I usually periodically run a script to check consistency, but that
>>> run was long overdue! Thanks for looking into that.
>>>
>>>> I did some quick checking and came up with the following list and
>>>> added current proposed changes and my suggestions:
>>>>
>>>>   openstack-dev/bashate
>>>>    Proposed for QA:
>>>>    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168012/
>>>>
>>>>   openstack-infra/ansible-puppet
>>>>    Proposed for Infra:
>>>>    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166820/
>>>>
>>>>   openstack/gantt
>>>>   openstack/python-ganttclient
>>>>    Suggestion nova:
>>>>    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168682/
>>>>
>>>>   openstack/os-client-config
>>>>    Proposed for openstackclient:
>>>>    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167730/
>>>>
>>>>   openstack-dev/ci-sandbox
>>>>   openstack-dev/sandbox
>>
>> These should be special-cased - they are repos that people use to test
>> their CI systems or dev workflow.
>>
>>>>   openstack-infra/vinz
>>>>   openstack-infra/vinz-webclient
>>>>     Suggestion: Infrastructure
>>
>> These don't really exist yet, but I don't see a problem with that.
>>
>>>>   openstack/ossa
>>>>     Suggestion: Release cycle management
>>>>
>>>>   openstack-dev/devstack-vagrant
>>>>     Suggestion: QA
>
> At least in this case I think this is basically another orphaned project. It was
> started by sdague in an effort to consolidate multiple nearly identical efforts
> that were spinning up. (before docker became the new hawtness) I don't think
> anyone has really been contributing to this in quite some time, it might be a
> better candidate for the attic. That being said if we want to keep it around it
> definitely would fit under QA's purview.

Sean, any proposal for this? I see move to attic, adopt by QA or wait...

Andreas
-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
        Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126