[OpenStack-Infra] Orphaned repositories in openstack* namespace

Monty Taylor mordred at inaugust.com
Mon Mar 30 14:53:51 UTC 2015


On 03/30/2015 03:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> We noticed last week that bashate was not part of any project in the
>> governance repo and wondered on IRC which other repositories are
>> orphaned - meaning added in one of the openstack namespaces but not
>> mentioned in governance/reference/.
> 
> Yes, I usually periodically run a script to check consistency, but that
> run was long overdue! Thanks for looking into that.
> 
>> I did some quick checking and came up with the following list and
>> added current proposed changes and my suggestions:
>>
>>  openstack-dev/bashate
>>   Proposed for QA:
>>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168012/
>>
>>  openstack-infra/ansible-puppet
>>   Proposed for Infra:
>>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166820/
>>
>>  openstack/gantt
>>  openstack/python-ganttclient
>>   Suggestion nova:
>>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168682/
>>
>>  openstack/os-client-config
>>   Proposed for openstackclient:
>>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167730/
>>
>>  openstack-dev/ci-sandbox
>>  openstack-dev/sandbox

These should be special-cased - they are repos that people use to test
their CI systems or dev workflow.

>>  openstack-infra/vinz
>>  openstack-infra/vinz-webclient
>>    Suggestion: Infrastructure

These don't really exist yet, but I don't see a problem with that.

>>  openstack/ossa
>>    Suggestion: Release cycle management
>>
>>  openstack-dev/devstack-vagrant
>>    Suggestion: QA
>>
>>  openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter
>>    Suggestion: Oslo
>>
>> Do you agree with my suggestions? If yes, I can sent patches for the
>> governance repo.
> 
> Yes. Thanks!
> 




More information about the OpenStack-Infra mailing list