[OpenStack-Infra] Setting the bar higher for stackforge

Sandy Walsh sandy.walsh at RACKSPACE.COM
Mon Sep 15 14:36:59 UTC 2014


On 2014-09-15 23:44:39 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:

>I think it goes without saying that the stackforge programme is an 
>important asset to OpenStack. However, with our current challenges and 
>limitations of the gate and resources I wonder if we should set the bar 
>higher for accepting stackforge projects.

For our group, the greatest value of StackForge is CLA management. We have
several groups that want to contribute and have already gone through the
massive effort of getting their legal team to approve the OpenStack CLA.
Adopting another CLA isn't feasible, so we have to move. 

Honestly,  I was kind of disappointed to lose our github organization and
having to mangle our repo names just for organizational purposes.

Would it be possible to just expose/extend/enforce the CLA side of StackForge
to repos outside of stackforge git?





More information about the OpenStack-Infra mailing list