Open Stack

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 06:37 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 07/02/2014 12:25 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:
>>>> I'd like to look at this in terms of the end goal, translations. That is
>>>> the end goal, yes?
>>>>
>>>> Is one tool any better than the other (zanta and pootle are the two
>>>> options, yes?) at doing translating? Is the end product substantially
>>>> better using one tool than the other?
>>>
>>> Right, Zanata and Pootle are the two leading options. The translations
>>> team seemed to prefer Zanata so we said we'd work to get a demo going
>>> for them so they could try it themselves, just like we have for
>>> Pootle.
>>>
>>> On our end maintainability is the major consideration, since we don't
>>> want to deploy a solution that will be disruptive to translators
>>> (during upgrades, etc) or insecure.
>>>
>> Can we get an item on next week's infra agenda and have some of the
>> folks doing the translation work attend and offer their opinion?
>>
>> It seems we might be at a point of weighing costs of setup and
>> maintenance time versus advantages of use.
>
> The i18n team meets tomorrow at 8am UTC - Liz, if you're awake, you
> could also join there...

Thanks! As tends to be the case with i18n meetings, that's 1AM for me,
but I'll see what I can do :)

-- 
Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2
http://www.princessleia.com