Open Stack

I agree that 2 meetings per week will mess things up. 1+ for alternating
meetings.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Kurt Taylor <kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is
> to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday
> and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday.
>
> Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach:
>
> 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at
> this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to
> justify having two meetings every week.
>
> 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone
> at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep
> consistent direction with the overall work group.
>
> 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a long-term
> chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this
> new meeting at the proposed time.
>
> 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current
> time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard
> for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend.
>
> My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just
> as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings)  I volunteered to chair, then
> ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times
> could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US
> and Europe, the next week for APAC.
>
> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com <
> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> --
>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208
>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM
>> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for
>> Additional Meeting for third-party
>>
>> On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote:
>> > Hello Anteaya,
>> >
>> > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel).
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Omri
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM
>> > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for
>> > Additional Meeting for third-party
>> >
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Josh
>> >
>> > Rackspace Australia
>> >
>> > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote:
>> >> anteaya,
>> >>
>> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for
>> china.
>> >>
>> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC
>> >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and
>> >> dinner.)
>> >>
>> >> Yongi He
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM
>> >> To: openstack Development Mailing List;
>> >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
>> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for
>> >> third-party
>> >>
>> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to
>> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from
>> non-North American time zones.
>> >>
>> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you.
>> The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well
>> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works
>> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal.
>> >>
>> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings,
>> he is in Australia.
>> >>
>> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those
>> interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks everyone,
>> >> Anita.
>> >>
>>
>> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied.
>>
>> Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable
>> additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We
>> live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone.
>>
>> It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to
>> suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date
>> + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already
>> booked the space on the wikipage).
>>
>> So barring further discussion, see you then!
>>
>> Thanks everyone,
>> Anita.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20141208/200e781b/attachment.html>