From liuxinguo at huawei.com Mon Dec 1 00:33:43 2014 From: liuxinguo at huawei.com (liuxinguo) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 00:33:43 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [devstack] image create mysql error Message-ID: When our CI run devstack, it occurs error when run " image create mysql". Log is pasted as following: 22186 2014-11-29 21:11:48.611 | ++ basename /opt/stack/new/devstack/files/mysql.qcow2 .qcow2 22187 2014-11-29 21:11:48.623 | + image_name=mysql 22188 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + disk_format=qcow2 22189 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + container_format=bare 22190 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + is_arch ppc64 22191 2014-11-29 21:11:48.628 | ++ uname -m 22192 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + [[ i686 == \p\p\c\6\4 ]] 22193 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + '[' bare = bare ']' 22194 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + '[' '' = zcat ']' 22195 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + openstack --os-token 5387fe9c6f6d4182b09461fe232501db --os-url http://127.0.0.1:9292 image create mysql --public --container-format=bare --disk-format qcow2 22196 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | ERROR: openstack 22197 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 22198 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 401 Unauthorized 22199 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 22200 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 22201 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 |

401 Unauthorized

22202 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document you requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser does not understand how to supply the credentials required.

22203 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 22204 2014-11-29 21:11:57.276 | 22205 2014-11-29 21:11:57.276 | (HTTP 401) 22206 2014-11-29 21:11:57.344 | + exit_trap * Any one can give me some hint? * Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mvineetmenon at gmail.com Mon Dec 1 09:13:20 2014 From: mvineetmenon at gmail.com (Vineet Menon) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:13:20 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [devstack] image create mysql error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Looks like the password supplied wasn't correct. Have you changed the pasword given in local.conf after a devstack installation? If yes, you need to purge mysql credentials stores in your machine. Regards, Vineet Menon On 1 December 2014 at 01:33, liuxinguo wrote: > When our CI run devstack, it occurs error when run ? image create > mysql?. Log is pasted as following: > > > > 22186 2014-11-29 21:11:48.611 | ++ basename > /opt/stack/new/devstack/files/mysql.qcow2 .qcow2 > > 22187 2014-11-29 21:11:48.623 | + image_name=mysql > > 22188 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + disk_format=qcow2 > > 22189 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + container_format=bare > > 22190 2014-11-29 21:11:48.624 | + is_arch ppc64 > > 22191 2014-11-29 21:11:48.628 | ++ uname -m > > 22192 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + [[ i686 == \p\p\c\6\4 ]] > > 22193 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + '[' bare = bare ']' > > 22194 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + '[' '' = zcat ']' > > 22195 2014-11-29 21:11:48.710 | + openstack --os-token > 5387fe9c6f6d4182b09461fe232501db --os-url http://127.0.0.1:9292 image > create mysql --public --container-format=bare --disk-format qcow2 > > 22196 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | ERROR: openstack > > 22197 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | > > 22198 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | 401 Unauthorized > > 22199 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | > > 22200 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | > > 22201 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 |

401 Unauthorized

> > 22202 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | This server could not verify that you > are authorized to access the document you requested. Either you supplied > the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser does not > understand how to supply the credentials required.

> > 22203 2014-11-29 21:11:57.275 | > > 22204 2014-11-29 21:11:57.276 | > > 22205 2014-11-29 21:11:57.276 | (HTTP 401) > > 22206 2014-11-29 21:11:57.344 | + exit_trap > > > > ? Any one can give me some hint? > > ? Thanks. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lyz at princessleia.com Mon Dec 1 19:20:41 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:20:41 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 2nd at 19:00 UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday December 2nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend. And in case you missed it, meeting log and minutes from the last meeting are available here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-11-25-19.01.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-11-25-19.01.txt Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-11-25-19.01.log.html -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From anteaya at anteaya.info Mon Dec 1 20:07:05 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:07:05 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party Message-ID: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. Thanks everyone, Anita. From daya_k at yahoo.com Tue Dec 2 04:01:05 2014 From: daya_k at yahoo.com (daya kamath) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 04:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <333765003.850985.1417492865541.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10710.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> hi anita,i am located in india, so, would prefer something slightly earlier, maybe 1-2 hours.thanks for checking. From: Anita Kuno To: openstack Development Mailing List ; "openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org" Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:37 AM Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com Tue Dec 2 04:13:57 2014 From: joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com (Joshua Hesketh) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:13:57 +1100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <547D3C85.9050106@rackspace.com> Hey, So to suit most APAC business hours we'd be looking somewhere between 00:00am -> 09:00am UTC. So we have a starting point, how would 00:00am Tuesday UTC suit people? For China that would be 8am, for Australia 11am (when in daylight savings). Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 12/2/14 7:07 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > non-North American time zones. > > Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works > for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > > Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he > is in Australia. > > Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From trinath.somanchi at freescale.com Tue Dec 2 08:32:07 2014 From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com (trinath.somanchi at freescale.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:32:07 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: Hi- Its nice to have CI operators meetings. I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From nuritv at mellanox.com Tue Dec 2 08:46:56 2014 From: nuritv at mellanox.com (Nurit Vilosny) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:46:56 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: HI, Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved if meetings would be earlier. We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will be ideal for us. Nurit -----Original Message----- From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party Hi- Its nice to have CI operators meetings. I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 11:44:48 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 05:44:48 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We could follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting times to accommodate everyone. I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating weeks: Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote: > HI, > Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved if > meetings would be earlier. > We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will be > ideal for us. > > Nurit > > -----Original Message----- > From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM > To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > Hi- > > Its nice to have CI operators meetings. > > I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. > > -- > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM > To: openstack Development Mailing List; > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for > third-party > > One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > non-North American time zones. > > Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works > for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > > Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he > is in Australia. > > Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sorlando at nicira.com Tue Dec 2 13:12:37 2014 From: sorlando at nicira.com (Salvatore Orlando) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:12:37 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it falls right around dinner time. It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over the pacific ocean. Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time range most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but it might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially during winter. Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but might fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit uncomfortable for New Zealand during their summer. Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the regular attendees come from those time zones. Regards, Salvatore On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. > > The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We could > follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting > times to accommodate everyone. > > I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating weeks: > Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote: > >> HI, >> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved if >> meetings would be earlier. >> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will be >> ideal for us. >> >> Nurit >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: >> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM >> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for >> Additional Meeting for third-party >> >> Hi- >> >> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. >> >> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. >> >> -- >> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >> third-party >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to >> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from >> non-North American time zones. >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The >> current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well >> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works >> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he >> is in Australia. >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested >> and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anteaya at anteaya.info Tue Dec 2 14:18:03 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:18:03 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> Thanks for all the responses so far. This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have meeting times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse people. We don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would work for everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend another. So far we have: Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC Nurit's suggestion of Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if Nurit and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see both of them being able to attend on a regular basis. If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, would that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the evening for you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) Thanks I appreciate the interest, Anita. On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it falls > right around dinner time. > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over the > pacific ocean. > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time range > most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but it > might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially during > winter. > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but might > fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit uncomfortable for New > Zealand during their summer. > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the regular > attendees come from those time zones. > > Regards, > Salvatore > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. >> >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We could >> follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting >> times to accommodate everyone. >> >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating weeks: >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 >> Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 >> >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote: >> >>> HI, >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved if >>> meetings would be earlier. >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will be >>> ideal for us. >>> >>> Nurit >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for >>> Additional Meeting for third-party >>> >>> Hi- >>> >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. >>> >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. >>> >>> -- >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >>> third-party >>> >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to >>> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from >>> non-North American time zones. >>> >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The >>> current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well >>> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works >>> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >>> >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he >>> is in Australia. >>> >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested >>> and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >>> >>> Thanks everyone, >>> Anita. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > From nuritv at mellanox.com Tue Dec 2 15:33:50 2014 From: nuritv at mellanox.com (Nurit Vilosny) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:33:50 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> , <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> Message-ID: We can also do it 7:00 utc if it is better -------- Original message -------- From: Anita Kuno Date:12/02/2014 16:23 (GMT+02:00) To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party Thanks for all the responses so far. This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have meeting times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse people. We don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would work for everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend another. So far we have: Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC Nurit's suggestion of Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if Nurit and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see both of them being able to attend on a regular basis. If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, would that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the evening for you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) Thanks I appreciate the interest, Anita. On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it falls > right around dinner time. > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over the > pacific ocean. > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time range > most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but it > might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially during > winter. > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but might > fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit uncomfortable for New > Zealand during their summer. > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the regular > attendees come from those time zones. > > Regards, > Salvatore > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. >> >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We could >> follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting >> times to accommodate everyone. >> >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating weeks: >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 >> Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 >> >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote: >> >>> HI, >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved if >>> meetings would be earlier. >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will be >>> ideal for us. >>> >>> Nurit >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for >>> Additional Meeting for third-party >>> >>> Hi- >>> >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. >>> >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. >>> >>> -- >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >>> third-party >>> >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to >>> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from >>> non-North American time zones. >>> >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The >>> current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well >>> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works >>> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >>> >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he >>> is in Australia. >>> >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested >>> and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >>> >>> Thanks everyone, >>> Anita. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 15:39:45 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:39:45 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> Message-ID: I think we would have MUCH better attendance if we changed the time from Monday. Most everyone in the summit session had heard of the meeting, but we only get 5 or so out of the 100+ possible. Everyone I have talked to agrees that the current time is not good, and that an additional time (or alternating meeting time) would be a great solution. As far as it confusing people, I think my fellow Third-party CI operators are smart enough to figure it out. It seems to work fine for the >10 other work groups that have implemented this approach. If we can agree on Wednesday, that is a start. I am much more flexible on the meeting times on Wednesday and earlier or later than I proposed is no problem for me. So Anita is not in favor of my alternating time proposal. Anyone else? Thanks everyone! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > Thanks for all the responses so far. > > This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have > meeting times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse > people. We don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would > work for everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an > *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend > another. > > So far we have: > Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC > Nurit's suggestion of Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 > Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal > Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays > > 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. > > Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if > Nurit and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see > both of them being able to attend on a regular basis. > > If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, > would that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the > evening for you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) > > Thanks I appreciate the interest, > Anita. > > > On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it falls > > right around dinner time. > > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over the > > pacific ocean. > > > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time > range > > most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but it > > might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially during > > winter. > > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but might > > fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit uncomfortable for New > > Zealand during their summer. > > > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the > regular > > attendees come from those time zones. > > > > Regards, > > Salvatore > > > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. > >> > >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We > could > >> follow what other working groups have done, having alternating meeting > >> times to accommodate everyone. > >> > >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating > weeks: > >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > >> Wednesday 2200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 > >> > >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny > wrote: > >> > >>> HI, > >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more involved > if > >>> meetings would be earlier. > >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, will > be > >>> ideal for us. > >>> > >>> Nurit > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: > >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM > >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > >>> Additional Meeting for third-party > >>> > >>> Hi- > >>> > >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. > >>> > >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM > >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for > >>> third-party > >>> > >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > >>> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > >>> non-North American time zones. > >>> > >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > >>> current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > >>> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that > works > >>> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > >>> > >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, > he > >>> is in Australia. > >>> > >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > >>> and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >>> > >>> Thanks everyone, > >>> Anita. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list > >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trinath.somanchi at freescale.com Tue Dec 2 18:09:40 2014 From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com (trinath.somanchi at freescale.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:09:40 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> Message-ID: Hi Anita- I'm okay/happy with your proposal on 08:00 AM UTC on Tuesdays. +1 -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7:48 PM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party Thanks for all the responses so far. This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have meeting times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse people. We don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would work for everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend another. So far we have: Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC Nurit's suggestion of Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if Nurit and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see both of them being able to attend on a regular basis. If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, would that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the evening for you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) Thanks I appreciate the interest, Anita. On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it > falls right around dinner time. > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over > the pacific ocean. > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time > range most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but > it might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially > during winter. > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but > might fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit > uncomfortable for New Zealand during their summer. > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the > regular attendees come from those time zones. > > Regards, > Salvatore > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. >> >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We >> could follow what other working groups have done, having alternating >> meeting times to accommodate everyone. >> >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating weeks: >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Wednesday 2200 UTC in >> #openstack-meeting-3 >> >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote: >> >>> HI, >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more >>> involved if meetings would be earlier. >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, >>> will be ideal for us. >>> >>> Nurit >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for >>> Additional Meeting for third-party >>> >>> Hi- >>> >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. >>> >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. >>> >>> -- >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting >>> for third-party >>> >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was >>> to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate >>> from non-North American time zones. >>> >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. >>> The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which >>> works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a >>> time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >>> >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these >>> meetings, he is in Australia. >>> >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those >>> interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >>> >>> Thanks everyone, >>> Anita. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From zaro0508 at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 20:30:30 2014 From: zaro0508 at gmail.com (Zaro) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:30:30 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [CI]Setup CI system behind proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Not sure why you would need to setup proxy just to connect zuul to gerrit. I could be wrong, but I don't believe you need to setup a proxy to just connect them. I've redirected your question to the, more appropriate, openstack-infra mail list. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, thanh le giang wrote: > Hi, > > I want to setup everything behind proxy, but i am stuck at step configure > zuul connect to gerrit. I can't find any option to set proxy on zuul.conf > file. > > Thanks > > 2014-12-03 1:00 GMT+07:00 Zaro : > >> Could you please clarify? Do you mean you want to setup everything >> behind a proxy? or do you mean you want to setup just gerrit behind a >> proxy? >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:26 PM, thanh le giang >> wrote: >> >>> Dear all >>> >>> I have set up a CI system successfully with directly access to internet. >>> Now I have another requirement which requires setting up CI system behind >>> proxy but i can't find any way to configure zuul to connect to gerrit >>> through proxy. >>> >>> Any advice is appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> >>> -- >>> L.G.Thanh >>> >>> Email: legiangthan at gmail.com >>> lgthanh at fit.hcmus.edu.vn >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > L.G.Thanh > > Email: legiangthan at gmail.com > lgthanh at fit.hcmus.edu.vn > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From legiangthanh at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 20:37:17 2014 From: legiangthanh at gmail.com (thanh le giang) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 03:37:17 +0700 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [CI]Setup CI system behind proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank Zaro. Actually, i have setup CI without proxy successfully, but i have another requirement from my boss to setup proxy run behind our company proxy. I think zuul doesn't support configure proxy now. I just ask this question to confirm my assumption. 2014-12-03 3:30 GMT+07:00 Zaro : > Not sure why you would need to setup proxy just to connect zuul to > gerrit. I could be wrong, but I don't believe you need to setup a proxy to > just connect them. I've redirected your question to the, more appropriate, > openstack-infra mail list. > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, thanh le giang > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to setup everything behind proxy, but i am stuck at step configure >> zuul connect to gerrit. I can't find any option to set proxy on zuul.conf >> file. >> >> Thanks >> >> 2014-12-03 1:00 GMT+07:00 Zaro : >> >>> Could you please clarify? Do you mean you want to setup everything >>> behind a proxy? or do you mean you want to setup just gerrit behind a >>> proxy? >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:26 PM, thanh le giang >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all >>>> >>>> I have set up a CI system successfully with directly access to >>>> internet. Now I have another requirement which requires setting up CI >>>> system behind proxy but i can't find any way to configure zuul to connect >>>> to gerrit through proxy. >>>> >>>> Any advice is appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Regards >>>> >>>> -- >>>> L.G.Thanh >>>> >>>> Email: legiangthan at gmail.com >>>> lgthanh at fit.hcmus.edu.vn >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> L.G.Thanh >> >> Email: legiangthan at gmail.com >> lgthanh at fit.hcmus.edu.vn >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > -- L.G.Thanh Email: legiangthan at gmail.com lgthanh at fit.hcmus.edu.vn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mihailmed at gmail.com Tue Dec 2 21:07:19 2014 From: mihailmed at gmail.com (Mikhail Medvedev) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:07:19 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <547DCA1B.8090605@anteaya.info> Message-ID: Hi, For me: - would not work: 03:00 UTC -- 12:00 UTC + better: 20:00 -- 01:00 UTC As for having alternating meetings vs. two different meeting times on the same week, I am leaning towards alternating. I have no strong opinion on this though. Thanks, Mikhail Medvedev (mmedvede) On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:09 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com < trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote: > Hi Anita- > > I'm okay/happy with your proposal on 08:00 AM UTC on Tuesdays. > > +1 > > -- > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 7:48 PM > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > Thanks for all the responses so far. > > This is to find an *additional* meeting time. This is not to have meeting > times that switch from week to week. That would only confuse people. We > don't need that. Trying to find a meeting time that would work for > everybody doesn't work, hence the direction to create an > *additional* meeting time. That way if you miss one, you can attend > another. > > So far we have: > Josh's suggestion of 00:00am Tuesday UTC Nurit's suggestion of Mondays > anytime between 8:00 - 16:00 Salvadore's seconding of Josh's proposal > Trinath's suggestion of 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays > > 1400 and 2200 doesn't give us anything better than what we have. > > Based on conversations at the summit, I would really like to see if Nurit > and Josh can convene on an agreed time, I would really like to see both of > them being able to attend on a regular basis. > > If we tried to work with an 8:00 utc time, either Monday or Tuesday, would > that work for you, Josh and Nurit? (That would be 7pm in the evening for > you, Josh - I think - is that workable?) > > Thanks I appreciate the interest, > Anita. > > > On 12/02/2014 08:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > 1800UTC should generally work for Europe. The only issue is that it > > falls right around dinner time. > > It is however a good timing since most of the night hours fall over > > the pacific ocean. > > > > Therefore I tend to agree with Joshua's proposal since with that time > > range most of the night hours would fall over the atlantic. > > Ideally 0600UTC is perfectly symmetric to the other meeting time, but > > it might be a bit tricky for western and central Europe, especially > > during winter. > > Anytime between 0700UTC and 0900UTC would be better for Europe, but > > might fall towards dinner time for Australia and be a bit > > uncomfortable for New Zealand during their summer. > > > > Anyway, this proposal would make the meeting time prohibitive for > > eastern/central US & Canada as well as South America. I don't know if > > that's acceptable considering that, from what I gather, most of the > > regular attendees come from those time zones. > > > > Regards, > > Salvatore > > > > On 2 December 2014 at 12:44, Kurt Taylor > wrote: > > > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Anita. > >> > >> The existing meeting time on Monday has never worked well for me. We > >> could follow what other working groups have done, having alternating > >> meeting times to accommodate everyone. > >> > >> I propose that we have 2 meetings of Third-party CI Ops, alternating > weeks: > >> Wednesday 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Wednesday 2200 UTC in > >> #openstack-meeting-3 > >> > >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Nurit Vilosny > wrote: > >> > >>> HI, > >>> Thanks Anita for pushing it. We will be able to be much more > >>> involved if meetings would be earlier. > >>> We're located in Israel, so Mondays anytime between 8:00 - 16:00, > >>> will be ideal for us. > >>> > >>> Nurit > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com [mailto: > >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:32 AM > >>> To: Anita Kuno; openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > >>> Additional Meeting for third-party > >>> > >>> Hi- > >>> > >>> Its nice to have CI operators meetings. > >>> > >>> I'm from India, Its okay for me for 05:00AM UTC on Tuesdays. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:37 AM > >>> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >>> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting > >>> for third-party > >>> > >>> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was > >>> to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate > >>> from non-North American time zones. > >>> > >>> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. > >>> The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which > >>> works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a > >>> time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would > be ideal. > >>> > >>> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these > >>> meetings, he is in Australia. > >>> > >>> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those > >>> interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >>> > >>> Thanks everyone, > >>> Anita. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list > >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yongli.he at intel.com Wed Dec 3 00:17:01 2014 From: yongli.he at intel.com (He, Yongli) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:17:01 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> anteaya, UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and dinner.) Yongi He -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev From joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com Wed Dec 3 07:03:37 2014 From: joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com (Joshua Hesketh) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:03:37 +1100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> Hey, 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: > anteaya, > > UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. > > if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and dinner.) > > Yongi He > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM > To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party > > One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. > > Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > > Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. > > Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From omrim at mellanox.com Wed Dec 3 08:15:07 2014 From: omrim at mellanox.com (Omri Marcovitch) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:15:07 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> Message-ID: Hello Anteaya, A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). Thanks Omri -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party Hey, 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: > anteaya, > > UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. > > if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and dinner.) > > Yongi He > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM > To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party > > One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. > > Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > > Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. > > Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 3 16:27:12 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:27:12 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 Message-ID: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > The OpenStack Infrastructure team will be hosting a virtual sprint in > the Freenode IRC channel #openstack-sprint for the Infrastructure User > Manual on December 1st starting at 15:00 UTC and going for 48 hours. Thanks to everyone who participated in our online documentation sprint this week! We made major progress with our manual (published here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/) and hope this push for core content will help us continue to refine and update the content for this valuable community resource moving forward. Now, some numbers: Sprint start: Patches open for review: 10 Patches merged in repo history: 13 Sprint end: Patches open for review: 3 (plus 2 WIP) See: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/infra-manual,n,z Patches merged during sprint: 30 See: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack-infra/infra-manual,n,z Reviews: Over 200 See http://stackalytics.com/?module=infra-manual&release=kilo We also have 16 patches for documentation in flight that were initiated or reviewed elsewhere in the openstack-infra project during this sprint, including the important reorganization of the git-review documentation. See: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+file:%255E.*%255C.rst+project:%255Eopenstack-infra/.*,n,z Sprint participants (sorted chronologically by reviews): Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph, Andreas Jaeger, James E. Blair, Anita Kuno, Clark Boylan, Spencer Krum, Jeremy Stanley, Doug Hellmann, Khai Do, Antoine Musso, Stefano Maffulli, Thierry Carrez and Yolanda Robla -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 3 17:03:14 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:03:14 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal Message-ID: Hi everyone, I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg Thoughts? Comments? So far I've mostly heard that it's "too nice" because our Zuul is mean - but I'm not sure that's such a bad thing ;) As mentioned during our meeting this week, this would show up on things like slides and documentation, much like Gerrit's Diffy Cuckoo[1] does. [0] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/publications/sysadmin-codereview/#(4) [1] http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gerrit-static/diffy-w200.png -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From sean at dague.net Wed Dec 3 17:09:22 2014 From: sean at dague.net (Sean Dague) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:09:22 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547F43C2.8030100@dague.net> On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a > few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what > Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. > > After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source > contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: > http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg 404? > > Thoughts? Comments? > > So far I've mostly heard that it's "too nice" because our Zuul is mean > - but I'm not sure that's such a bad thing ;) > > As mentioned during our meeting this week, this would show up on > things like slides and documentation, much like Gerrit's Diffy > Cuckoo[1] does. > > [0] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/publications/sysadmin-codereview/#(4) > [1] http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gerrit-static/diffy-w200.png > -- Sean Dague http://dague.net From anteaya at anteaya.info Wed Dec 3 17:12:10 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:12:10 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547F446A.5090800@anteaya.info> On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a > few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what > Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. > > After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source > contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: > http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg > > Thoughts? Comments? > > So far I've mostly heard that it's "too nice" because our Zuul is mean > - but I'm not sure that's such a bad thing ;) > > As mentioned during our meeting this week, this would show up on > things like slides and documentation, much like Gerrit's Diffy > Cuckoo[1] does. > > [0] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/publications/sysadmin-codereview/#(4) > [1] http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gerrit-static/diffy-w200.png > Is there any risk of us attracting attention of anyone that might prevent us using the name at all? It would be a shame to getting into a branding battle which we would lose should we do something to spark one. If we decide we want a logo, I have no objections to this one. I'm just wondering if we might trigger a consequence that so far hasn't occurred. Thanks, Anita. From anteaya at anteaya.info Wed Dec 3 17:22:53 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:22:53 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547F46ED.5050404@anteaya.info> On 12/03/2014 11:27 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph > wrote: >> The OpenStack Infrastructure team will be hosting a virtual sprint in >> the Freenode IRC channel #openstack-sprint for the Infrastructure User >> Manual on December 1st starting at 15:00 UTC and going for 48 hours. > > Thanks to everyone who participated in our online documentation sprint > this week! > > We made major progress with our manual (published here: > http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/) and hope this push for core > content will help us continue to refine and update the content for > this valuable community resource moving forward. > > Now, some numbers: > > Sprint start: > Patches open for review: 10 > Patches merged in repo history: 13 > > Sprint end: > Patches open for review: 3 (plus 2 WIP) > See: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/infra-manual,n,z > > Patches merged during sprint: 30 > See: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack-infra/infra-manual,n,z > > Reviews: Over 200 > See http://stackalytics.com/?module=infra-manual&release=kilo > > We also have 16 patches for documentation in flight that were > initiated or reviewed elsewhere in the openstack-infra project during > this sprint, including the important reorganization of the git-review > documentation. See: > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+file:%255E.*%255C.rst+project:%255Eopenstack-infra/.*,n,z > > Sprint participants (sorted chronologically by reviews): Elizabeth > Krumbach Joseph, Andreas Jaeger, James E. Blair, Anita Kuno, Clark > Boylan, Spencer Krum, Jeremy Stanley, Doug Hellmann, Khai Do, Antoine > Musso, Stefano Maffulli, Thierry Carrez and Yolanda Robla > Thanks for putting these stats together, Lyz! Awesome work everyone, glad to see we made such wonderful progress. Thanks, Anita. From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 3 17:38:17 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:38:17 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: <547F43C2.8030100@dague.net> References: <547F43C2.8030100@dague.net> Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a >> few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what >> Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. >> >> After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source >> contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: >> http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg > > 404? It's been working fine, and confirmed again it still does. Copy/paste error? -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From sean at dague.net Wed Dec 3 17:41:25 2014 From: sean at dague.net (Sean Dague) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:41:25 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: References: <547F43C2.8030100@dague.net> Message-ID: <547F4B45.1040908@dague.net> On 12/03/2014 12:38 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a >>> few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what >>> Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. >>> >>> After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source >>> contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: >>> http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg >> >> 404? > > It's been working fine, and confirmed again it still does. Copy/paste error? > Nope, looks like you have IPv6 on your domain, but not an IPv6 vhost. ribos:~/code/openstack/devstack-gate(no_grenade_ceilometer)> HEAD http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg 404 Not Found Connection: close Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:40:26 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Client-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:40:26 GMT Client-Peer: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe89:3d09:80 Client-Response-Num: 1 ribos:~/code/openstack/devstack-gate(no_grenade_ceilometer)> GET http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg 404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg was not found on this server.

Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at princessleia.com Port 80
-- Sean Dague http://dague.net From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 3 17:51:24 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:51:24 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: <547F4B45.1040908@dague.net> References: <547F43C2.8030100@dague.net> <547F4B45.1040908@dague.net> Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/03/2014 12:38 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a >>>> few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what >>>> Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. >>>> >>>> After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source >>>> contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: >>>> http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg >>> >>> 404? >> >> It's been working fine, and confirmed again it still does. Copy/paste error? >> > > Nope, looks like you have IPv6 on your domain, but not an IPv6 vhost. Actually, looks like my ipv6 address changed. Argh. Updating DNS. Thanks. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 3 18:09:18 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:09:18 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a > few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what > Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. As a data point, here's feedback I got from a FORJ contributor on Twitter, in leiu of a formal logo, they have made some of their own basic representations: https://twitter.com/yemario/status/540204958243491840/photo/1 (Note that they don't use Diffy for Gerrit either) -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From zaro0508 at gmail.com Wed Dec 3 18:10:53 2014 From: zaro0508 at gmail.com (Zaro) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:10:53 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul logo proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 on idea of zuul logo. Not not a fan of this particular logo but +1 of we have nothing better to use :) On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I do a fair number of presentations about our infrastructure, and a > few times after showing this slide[0] I've gotten questions about what > Zuul's logo is. Huh! Maybe Zuul should have a logo. > > After describing Zuul as a pink dragon gatekeeper, an open source > contributor + artist friend of mine whipped up this: > http://princessleia.com/temp/Zuul-sketch.jpg > > Thoughts? Comments? > > So far I've mostly heard that it's "too nice" because our Zuul is mean > - but I'm not sure that's such a bad thing ;) > > As mentioned during our meeting this week, this would show up on > things like slides and documentation, much like Gerrit's Diffy > Cuckoo[1] does. > > [0] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/publications/sysadmin-codereview/#(4) > [1] http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/gerrit-static/diffy-w200.png > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anteaya at anteaya.info Wed Dec 3 20:56:56 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:56:56 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party] Third-party CI account creation is now self-serve Message-ID: <547F7918.6000700@anteaya.info> As of now third-party CI account creation is now self-serve. I think this makes everybody happy. What does this mean? Well for a new third-party account this means you follow the new process, outlined here: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account If you don't have enough information from these docs, please contact the infra team then we will work on a patch once you learn what you needed, to fill in the holes for others. If you currently have a third-party CI account on Gerrit, this is what will happen with your account: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#permissions-on-your-third-party-system Short story is we will be moving voting accounts into project specific voting groups. Your voting rights will not change, but will be directly managed by project release groups. Non voting accounts will be removed from the now redundant Third-Party CI group and otherwise will not be changed. If you are a member of a -release group for a project currently receiving third-party CI votes, you will find that you have access to manage membership in a new group in Gerrit called -ci. To allow a CI system to vote on your project, add it to the -ci group, and to disable voting on your project, remove them from that group. We hope you are as excited about this change as we are. Let us know if you have questions, do try to work with third-party project representatives as much as you can. Thank you, Anita. From aj at suse.com Wed Dec 3 21:00:13 2014 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:00:13 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547F79DD.2010609@suse.com> We have now a few wiki pages and links that should go to the new manual. I've submitted a first patch already but have the question how to move this forward to remove the duplication that we should did. Btw. great sprint, I really enjoyed it! Thanks everybody, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF:Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imend?rffer,HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From anteaya at anteaya.info Wed Dec 3 22:25:05 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:25:05 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> Message-ID: <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > Hello Anteaya, > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > Thanks > Omri > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party > > Hey, > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > Cheers, > Josh > > Rackspace Australia > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> anteaya, >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and dinner.) >> >> Yongi He >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already booked the space on the wikipage). So barring further discussion, see you then! Thanks everyone, Anita. From stefano at openstack.org Thu Dec 4 01:54:25 2014 From: stefano at openstack.org (Stefano Maffulli) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:54:25 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 In-Reply-To: <547F79DD.2010609@suse.com> References: <547F79DD.2010609@suse.com> Message-ID: <547FBED1.2070800@openstack.org> On 12/03/2014 01:00 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > We have now a few wiki pages and links that should go to the new manual. > I've submitted a first patch already but have the question how to move > this forward to remove the duplication that we should did. We should just start deprecating wiki pages ASAP before the versions start drifting apart. A lot of the pages under 'Contribute' category should probably go. I have changed wiki/ReviewsChecklist whose full content I simply moved over to the manual but others. Does anybody know how to make redirects to external sites work on mediawiki? For 'How to Contribute' I've removed the content regarding the CLAs since they're now on infra manual. Please review what's left and see if anything else can be moved over. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute#If_you.27re_a_developer Cheers, stef From trinath.somanchi at freescale.com Thu Dec 4 05:10:23 2014 From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com (trinath.somanchi at freescale.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 05:10:23 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: +1. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > Hello Anteaya, > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > Thanks > Omri > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > Hey, > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > Cheers, > Josh > > Rackspace Australia > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> anteaya, >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and >> dinner.) >> >> Yongi He >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >> third-party >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already booked the space on the wikipage). So barring further discussion, see you then! Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From aj at suse.com Thu Dec 4 09:59:46 2014 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:59:46 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 In-Reply-To: <547FBED1.2070800@openstack.org> References: <547F79DD.2010609@suse.com> <547FBED1.2070800@openstack.org> Message-ID: <54803092.9040900@suse.com> On 12/04/2014 02:54 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 12/03/2014 01:00 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> We have now a few wiki pages and links that should go to the new manual. >> I've submitted a first patch already but have the question how to move >> this forward to remove the duplication that we should did. > > We should just start deprecating wiki pages ASAP before the versions > start drifting apart. A lot of the pages under 'Contribute' category > should probably go. I have changed wiki/ReviewsChecklist whose full > content I simply moved over to the manual but others. Does anybody know > how to make redirects to external sites work on mediawiki? If there's now wait to do this, we should just add a short redirect text and then make the page immutable so that nobody starts editing again. > For 'How to Contribute' I've removed the content regarding the CLAs > since they're now on infra manual. Please review what's left and see if > anything else can be moved over. > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute#If_you.27re_a_developer Great, thanks! Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF:Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imend?rffer,HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From herseeing at 126.com Thu Dec 4 11:12:30 2014 From: herseeing at 126.com (herseeing) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:12:30 +0800 (CST) Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] request an Upstream service accout Message-ID: <5c42211b.2fbab.14a150051bb.Coremail.herseeing@126.com> Email address: herseeing at 126.com Short username: TESTPOWER public key is attached. Thank you, Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gerrit_key.pub Type: application/octet-stream Size: 231 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Thu Dec 4 15:22:52 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:22:52 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party] Third-party CI documentation WG forming Message-ID: At the kilo summit third-party session we discussed the need for a complete overhaul of the third-party CI documentation. Several in attendance volunteered to help with this effort. To help get us started, I have created an etherpad to help organize the thoughts of those involved. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/third-party-ci-documentation Please thoroughly review the existing documentation and also add yourself as a contact to this etherpad if you wish to participate. I have put some initial thoughts and links there, but please feel free to add to it. When we get a group signed up, we can decide how to proceed. Since the Infra manual virtual sprint was such a success, how would everyone feel about a 2 day third-party CI documentation virtual sprint? I think we could bang out a pretty nice doc in that timeframe. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano at openstack.org Thu Dec 4 17:13:40 2014 From: stefano at openstack.org (Stefano Maffulli) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:13:40 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Infra-manual documentation Sprint, December 1-2 In-Reply-To: <54803092.9040900@suse.com> References: <547F79DD.2010609@suse.com> <547FBED1.2070800@openstack.org> <54803092.9040900@suse.com> Message-ID: <54809644.10407@openstack.org> On 12/04/2014 01:59 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > If there's now wait to do this, we should just add a short redirect text > and then make the page immutable so that nobody starts editing again. I don't think this is the best approach. At some point, the pages on docs.o.o will be changed and will be out of sync with the wiki. Since there was a decision to move content *out* of the wiki and into docs.o.o so let's complete the task. I don't see another solution than to cut the cord in one zip (like a bandaid): wipe the page clean and add a link to the external page like I did on: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist That will probably confuse search engines but better that than having to maintain information in two places. /stef From lyz at princessleia.com Thu Dec 4 17:49:26 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:49:26 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] request an Upstream service accout In-Reply-To: <5c42211b.2fbab.14a150051bb.Coremail.herseeing@126.com> References: <5c42211b.2fbab.14a150051bb.Coremail.herseeing@126.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:12 AM, herseeing wrote: > Email address: herseeing at 126.com > Short username: TESTPOWER > public key is attached. Hi Tom, We have transitioned to making this account creation self-service, please see the third party documentation on creating a service account: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Fri Dec 5 08:32:45 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:32:45 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI Message-ID: Hello everyone, Thanks to the latest changes to the creation of service accounts process we're one step closer to setting up our own CI platform for Cinder. So far we've got: - Jenkins master (with Gerrit plugin) and slave (with DevStack and our storage solution) - Service account configured and tested (can manually connect to review.openstack.org and get events and publish comments) Next step would be to set up a job to do the actual testing, this is where we're stuck. Can someone please point us to a clear example on how a job should look like (preferably for testing Cinder on Kilo)? Most links we've found are broken, or tools/scripts are no longer working. Also, we cannot change the Jenkins master too much (it's owned by Ops team and they need a list of tools/scripts to review before installing/running so we're not allowed to experiment). Thanks, Eduard -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry at openstack.org Fri Dec 5 08:51:45 2014 From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:51:45 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: [openstack-dev] Session length on wiki.openstack.org In-Reply-To: <20141205010348.GY84915@thor.bakeyournoodle.com> References: <20141205010348.GY84915@thor.bakeyournoodle.com> Message-ID: <54817221.3090309@openstack.org> Cross-posting from -dev FWIW I agree with the request, the wiki session duration seems to have been dramatically lowered a few months ago. -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet : [openstack-dev] Session length on wiki.openstack.org Date : Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:03:49 +1100 De : Tony Breeds R?pondre ? : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Pour : openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org Hello Wiki masters, Is there anyway to extend the session length on the wiki? In my current work flow I login to the wiki do work and then get distracted by code/IRC when I go back to the wiki I'm almost always logged out (I'm guessing due to inactivity). It feels like this is about 30mins but I could be wrong. Is there anyway for me to tweak this session length for myself? If not can it be increased to say 2 hours? Yours Tony. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Fri Dec 5 15:08:59 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:08:59 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to justify having two meetings every week. 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work group. 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, the next week for APAC. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com < trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote: > +1. > > -- > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > > Hello Anteaya, > > > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > > > > Thanks > > Omri > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > > Additional Meeting for third-party > > > > Hey, > > > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > Rackspace Australia > > > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: > >> anteaya, > >> > >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. > >> > >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC > >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and > >> dinner.) > >> > >> Yongi He > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM > >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for > >> third-party > >> > >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > non-North American time zones. > >> > >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works > for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > >> > >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, > he is in Australia. > >> > >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >> > >> Thanks everyone, > >> Anita. > >> > > Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. > > Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable > additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We > live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. > > It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to > suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date > + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already > booked the space on the wikipage). > > So barring further discussion, see you then! > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daya_k at yahoo.com Mon Dec 8 07:44:23 2014 From: daya_k at yahoo.com (daya kamath) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <476497005.1536685.1418024663452.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10706.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> +1 for revolving meetings From: Kurt Taylor To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) ; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 8:38 PM Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday.? Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to justify having two meetings every week. 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work group. 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we?do not have a commitment for a long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) ?I volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, the next week for APAC. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com wrote: +1. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > Hello Anteaya, > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > Thanks > Omri > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > Hey, > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > Cheers, > Josh > > Rackspace Australia > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> anteaya, >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and >> dinner.) >> >> Yongi He >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >> third-party >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already booked the space on the wikipage). So barring further discussion, see you then! Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Sam.Wan at emc.com Mon Dec 8 08:13:39 2014 From: Sam.Wan at emc.com (Wan, Sam) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 03:13:39 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' Message-ID: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Dear all, Our CI failed at devstack setup. The error messages in devstacklog is as below: 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | ./stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701:die 2014-12-07 22:33:47.965 | [ERROR] /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701 nova-api did not start 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | exit_trap: cleaning up child processes 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | ./stack.sh: line 441: kill: (5161) - No such process 2014-12-07 22:33:48.971 | Error on exit 2014-12-07 22:33:49.019 | World dumping... see /opt/stack/new/worlddump-2014-12-07-223349.txt for details 2014-12-07 22:33:49.086 | ./stack.sh: line 434: 428 Terminated _old_run_process "$service" "$command" Seems there's something wrong with nova-api. Has someone met this too? Any suggestion or clue will be appreciated. Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Sam.Wan at emc.com Mon Dec 8 09:49:17 2014 From: Sam.Wan at emc.com (Wan, Sam) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 04:49:17 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' In-Reply-To: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> References: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Message-ID: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAEA13@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Hi there, The problem turns out to be that we have a lower version of 'retrying' package. After upgrading 'retrying' to latest 1.3.2 by 'pip install -U retrying' , devstack can run. Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From: Wan, Sam [mailto:Sam.Wan at emc.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:14 PM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' Dear all, Our CI failed at devstack setup. The error messages in devstacklog is as below: 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | ./stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701:die 2014-12-07 22:33:47.965 | [ERROR] /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701 nova-api did not start 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | exit_trap: cleaning up child processes 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | ./stack.sh: line 441: kill: (5161) - No such process 2014-12-07 22:33:48.971 | Error on exit 2014-12-07 22:33:49.019 | World dumping... see /opt/stack/new/worlddump-2014-12-07-223349.txt for details 2014-12-07 22:33:49.086 | ./stack.sh: line 434: 428 Terminated _old_run_process "$service" "$command" Seems there's something wrong with nova-api. Has someone met this too? Any suggestion or clue will be appreciated. Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rick.chen at prophetstor.com Mon Dec 8 10:07:02 2014 From: rick.chen at prophetstor.com (Rick Chen) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:07:02 +0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' In-Reply-To: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> References: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Message-ID: <001401d012ce$b67358c0$235a0a40$@prophetstor.com> HI Sam: I happed same issue. In the some log has trace-back in the oslo package, but I forgot which one. I try to update all oslo.XXX that can solve this problem. Ex: pip install oslo.concurrency --upgrade From: Wan, Sam [mailto:Sam.Wan at emc.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:14 PM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' Dear all, Our CI failed at devstack setup. The error messages in devstacklog is as below: 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | ./stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701:die 2014-12-07 22:33:47.965 | [ERROR] /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701 nova-api did not start 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | exit_trap: cleaning up child processes 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | ./stack.sh: line 441: kill: (5161) - No such process 2014-12-07 22:33:48.971 | Error on exit 2014-12-07 22:33:49.019 | World dumping... see /opt/stack/new/worlddump-2014-12-07-223349.txt for details 2014-12-07 22:33:49.086 | ./stack.sh: line 434: 428 Terminated _old_run_process "$service" "$command" Seems there's something wrong with nova-api. Has someone met this too? Any suggestion or clue will be appreciated. Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Sam.Wan at emc.com Mon Dec 8 10:21:24 2014 From: Sam.Wan at emc.com (Wan, Sam) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 05:21:24 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' In-Reply-To: <001401d012ce$b67358c0$235a0a40$@prophetstor.com> References: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> <001401d012ce$b67358c0$235a0a40$@prophetstor.com> Message-ID: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAEA1D@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Hi Rick, Thanks. Actually I only upgraded 'retrying' and that works Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From: Rick Chen [mailto:rick.chen at prophetstor.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 6:07 PM To: Wan, Sam; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' HI Sam: I happed same issue. In the some log has trace-back in the oslo package, but I forgot which one. I try to update all oslo.XXX that can solve this problem. Ex: pip install oslo.concurrency --upgrade From: Wan, Sam [mailto:Sam.Wan at emc.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:14 PM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' Dear all, Our CI failed at devstack setup. The error messages in devstacklog is as below: 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | ./stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701:die 2014-12-07 22:33:47.965 | [ERROR] /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701 nova-api did not start 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | exit_trap: cleaning up child processes 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | ./stack.sh: line 441: kill: (5161) - No such process 2014-12-07 22:33:48.971 | Error on exit 2014-12-07 22:33:49.019 | World dumping... see /opt/stack/new/worlddump-2014-12-07-223349.txt for details 2014-12-07 22:33:49.086 | ./stack.sh: line 434: 428 Terminated _old_run_process "$service" "$command" Seems there's something wrong with nova-api. Has someone met this too? Any suggestion or clue will be appreciated. Thanks and regards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Wan Shan (Sam) | Openstack Certification | EMC E-Lab | Tel: +86-28-82966713 | Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of China ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sombrafam at gmail.com Mon Dec 8 12:28:14 2014 From: sombrafam at gmail.com (Erlon Cruz) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:28:14 -0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: I agree that 2 meetings per week will mess things up. 1+ for alternating meetings. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is > to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday > and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. > > Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: > > 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at > this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to > justify having two meetings every week. > > 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone > at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep > consistent direction with the overall work group. > > 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a long-term > chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this > new meeting at the proposed time. > > 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current > time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard > for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. > > My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just > as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered to chair, then > ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times > could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US > and Europe, the next week for APAC. > > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com < > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> -- >> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM >> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for >> Additional Meeting for third-party >> >> On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: >> > Hello Anteaya, >> > >> > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > Omri >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM >> > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for >> > Additional Meeting for third-party >> > >> > Hey, >> > >> > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Josh >> > >> > Rackspace Australia >> > >> > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> >> anteaya, >> >> >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for >> china. >> >> >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC >> >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and >> >> dinner.) >> >> >> >> Yongi He >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >> >> third-party >> >> >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to >> start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from >> non-North American time zones. >> >> >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. >> The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well >> since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works >> for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, >> he is in Australia. >> >> >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those >> interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> >> >> Thanks everyone, >> >> Anita. >> >> >> >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. >> >> Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable >> additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We >> live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. >> >> It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to >> suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date >> + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already >> booked the space on the wikipage). >> >> So barring further discussion, see you then! >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trinath.somanchi at freescale.com Mon Dec 8 13:48:13 2014 From: trinath.somanchi at freescale.com (trinath.somanchi at freescale.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:48:13 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: With Kurt Taylor. +1 Very nice idea to start with. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 From: Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to justify having two meetings every week. 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work group. 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, the next week for APAC. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com > wrote: +1. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 -----Original Message----- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > Hello Anteaya, > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > Thanks > Omri > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > Hey, > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > Cheers, > Josh > > Rackspace Australia > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> anteaya, >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and >> dinner.) >> >> Yongi He >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for >> third-party >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, he is in Australia. >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already booked the space on the wikipage). So barring further discussion, see you then! Thanks everyone, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Mon Dec 8 14:33:02 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:33:02 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Resending this to dev ML as it seems i get quicker response :) I created a job in Jenkins, added as Build Trigger: "Gerrit Event: Patchset Created", chose as server the configured Gerrit server that was previously tested, then added the project openstack-dev/sandbox and saved. I made a change on dev sandbox repo but couldn't trigger my job. Any ideas? Thanks, Eduard On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Eduard Matei < eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thanks to the latest changes to the creation of service accounts process > we're one step closer to setting up our own CI platform for Cinder. > > So far we've got: > - Jenkins master (with Gerrit plugin) and slave (with DevStack and our > storage solution) > - Service account configured and tested (can manually connect to > review.openstack.org and get events and publish comments) > > Next step would be to set up a job to do the actual testing, this is where > we're stuck. > Can someone please point us to a clear example on how a job should look > like (preferably for testing Cinder on Kilo)? Most links we've found are > broken, or tools/scripts are no longer working. > Also, we cannot change the Jenkins master too much (it's owned by Ops team > and they need a list of tools/scripts to review before installing/running > so we're not allowed to experiment). > > Thanks, > Eduard > > -- > > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > www.cloudfounders.com > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > Disclaimer: > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > > -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lyz at princessleia.com Mon Dec 8 15:21:37 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:21:37 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 9th at 19:00 UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday December 9th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend. And in case you missed it, meeting log and minutes from the last meeting are available here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-02-19.01.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-02-19.01.txt Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-02-19.01.log.html -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From steve.weston at triniplex.com Tue Dec 9 02:50:25 2014 From: steve.weston at triniplex.com (Steve Weston) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:50:25 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <54866371.5090705@triniplex.com> Hi Everyone, I have summarized the responses so far in a Google spreadsheet document [1]. Looks like the consensus has converged on alternating meetings, in UTC: Week 1 - Mondays 1800 or 1300 Week 2 - Tuesdays 0800 I would be agreeable to moving the Monday meeting to Wednesday, and alternating as Kurt suggested. I have set up a Google moderator page [2] so that all interested parties can provide their input for a final tally. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1glmZirKpp1wGvcJ0Zx35IkmJ23CSpfq2NoAK3_vW6b8/pubhtml [2] https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=21b93c Thanks, Steve Weston Triniplex On 12/8/14 5:48 AM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com wrote: > > With Kurt Taylor. +1 > > Very nice idea to start with. > > -- > > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com| extn: 4048 > > *From:*Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table > is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on > Monday and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC > on Tuesday. > > Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: > > 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed > at this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting > content to justify having two meetings every week. > > 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be > undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be > difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work group. > > 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a > long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able > to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. > > 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the > current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main > reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. > > My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, > just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See > examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered > to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings > evolved. The meeting times could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That > way, one week we are good for US and Europe, the next week for APAC. > > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com > > > wrote: > > +1. > > -- > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com > | extn: 4048 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info > ] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time > for Additional Meeting for third-party > > On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > > Hello Anteaya, > > > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > > > > Thanks > > Omri > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com > ] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > > Additional Meeting for third-party > > > > Hey, > > > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > Rackspace Australia > > > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: > >> anteaya, > >> > >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time > for china. > >> > >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC > >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and > >> dinner.) > >> > >> Yongi He > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info > ] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM > >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional > Meeting for > >> third-party > >> > >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session > was to start up an additional meeting for CI operators to > participate from non-North American time zones. > >> > >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for > you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc > which works well since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could > find a time that works for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday > that would be ideal. > >> > >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these > meetings, he is in Australia. > >> > >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those > interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >> > >> Thanks everyone, > >> Anita. > >> > > Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. > > Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a > suitable additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks > in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is no time that will > suit everyone. > > It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am > going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for > space at that date > + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already > booked the space on the wikipage). > > So barring further discussion, see you then! > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Tue Dec 9 03:29:50 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:29:50 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <54866371.5090705@triniplex.com> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> <54866371.5090705@triniplex.com> Message-ID: Thanks Steve, you beat me to it by just a few minutes. :) Can you load up these times? I was going to propose the following (all UTC and on Wednesday, alternating weeks): A) 12:00 and 22:00 B) 13:00 and 02:00 C) 14:00 and 03:00 D) 15:00 and 04:00 These times would alternate weeks, for instance one week the first time, the next week the second time. Vote for your favorite from the above, A, B, C, D. Thanks everyone! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Steve Weston wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have summarized the responses so far in a Google spreadsheet document > [1]. > > Looks like the consensus has converged on alternating meetings, in UTC: > > Week 1 - Mondays 1800 or 1300 > Week 2 - Tuesdays 0800 > > I would be agreeable to moving the Monday meeting to Wednesday, and > alternating as Kurt suggested. I have set up a Google moderator page [2] > so that all interested parties can provide their input for a final tally. > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1glmZirKpp1wGvcJ0Zx35IkmJ23CSpfq2NoAK3_vW6b8/pubhtml > [2] https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=21b93c > > Thanks, > Steve Weston > Triniplex > > On 12/8/14 5:48 AM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com wrote: > > With Kurt Taylor. +1 > > > > Very nice idea to start with. > > > > -- > > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > > > > *From:* Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com > ] > *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > > > In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is > to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC on Monday > and, also in the same week, to have another meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. > > > > Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: > > > > 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at > this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to > justify having two meetings every week. > > > > 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be undone > at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be difficult to keep > consistent direction with the overall work group. > > > > 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a long-term > chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be able to attend this > new meeting at the proposed time. > > > > 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the current > time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main reason it is hard > for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. > > > > My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, just > as other work groups have done to solve this problem. (See examples at: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered to chair, then > ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times > could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US > and Europe, the next week for APAC. > > > > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com < > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote: > > +1. > > -- > Trinath Somanchi - B39208 > trinath.somanchi at freescale.com | extn: 4048 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for > Additional Meeting for third-party > > On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: > > Hello Anteaya, > > > > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). > > > > > > Thanks > > Omri > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM > > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for > > Additional Meeting for third-party > > > > Hey, > > > > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > Rackspace Australia > > > > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: > >> anteaya, > >> > >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal time for china. > >> > >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time between UTC > >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to home and > >> dinner.) > >> > >> Yongi He > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM > >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; > >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for > >> third-party > >> > >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit session was to > start up an additional meeting for CI operators to participate from > non-North American time zones. > >> > >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work for you. The > current third party meeting is on Mondays at 1800 utc which works well > since Infra meetings are on Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works > for Europe and APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. > >> > >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for these meetings, > he is in Australia. > >> > >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for those interested > and then we can narrow it down and pick a channel. > >> > >> Thanks everyone, > >> Anita. > >> > > Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. > > Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to find a suitable > additional third-party meeting time geared towards folks in EU and APAC. We > live on a sphere, there is no time that will suit everyone. > > It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I am going to > suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition for space at that date > + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have already > booked the space on the wikipage). > > So barring further discussion, see you then! > > Thanks everyone, > Anita. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing listOpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve.weston at triniplex.com Tue Dec 9 04:48:08 2014 From: steve.weston at triniplex.com (Steve Weston) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:48:08 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> <54866371.5090705@triniplex.com> Message-ID: <54867F08.7070008@triniplex.com> Times are entered. Let the voting begin!! On 12/8/14 7:29 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > Thanks Steve, you beat me to it by just a few minutes. :) Can you > load up these times? > > I was going to propose the following (all UTC and on Wednesday, > alternating weeks): > A) 12:00 and 22:00 > B) 13:00 and 02:00 > C) 14:00 and 03:00 > D) 15:00 and 04:00 > > These times would alternate weeks, for instance one week the first > time, the next week the second time. > > Vote for your favorite from the above, A, B, C, D. > > Thanks everyone! > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Steve Weston > > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I have summarized the responses so far in a Google spreadsheet > document [1]. > > Looks like the consensus has converged on alternating meetings, in > UTC: > > Week 1 - Mondays 1800 or 1300 > Week 2 - Tuesdays 0800 > > I would be agreeable to moving the Monday meeting to Wednesday, > and alternating as Kurt suggested. I have set up a Google > moderator page [2] so that all interested parties can provide > their input for a final tally. > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1glmZirKpp1wGvcJ0Zx35IkmJ23CSpfq2NoAK3_vW6b8/pubhtml > [2] https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=21b93c > > Thanks, > Steve Weston > Triniplex > > On 12/8/14 5:48 AM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com > wrote: >> >> With Kurt Taylor. +1 >> >> Very nice idea to start with. >> >> -- >> >> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >> >> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com| extn: 4048 >> >> *From:*Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM >> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] >> [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party >> >> In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the >> table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of >> 1800UTC on Monday and, also in the same week, to have another >> meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. >> >> Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: >> >> 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is >> needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't >> enough meeting content to justify having two meetings every week. >> >> 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially >> be undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will >> be difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work >> group. >> >> 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a >> long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be >> able to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. >> >> 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the >> current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main >> reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. >> >> My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating >> times, just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. >> (See examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I >> volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the >> meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between >> 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, >> the next week for APAC. >> >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com >> >> > > wrote: >> >> +1. >> >> -- >> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com >> | extn: 4048 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info >> ] >> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM >> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> >> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] >> [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party >> >> On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: >> > Hello Anteaya, >> > >> > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great (Israel). >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > Omri >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com >> ] >> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM >> > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for >> usage >> > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] >> [third-party]Time for >> > Additional Meeting for third-party >> > >> > Hey, >> > >> > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Josh >> > >> > Rackspace Australia >> > >> > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >> >> anteaya, >> >> >> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal >> time for china. >> >> >> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time >> between UTC >> >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to >> home and >> >> dinner.) >> >> >> >> Yongi He >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info >> ] >> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >> >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >> >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional >> Meeting for >> >> third-party >> >> >> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit >> session was to start up an additional meeting for CI >> operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >> >> >> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work >> for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at >> 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on >> Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and >> APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >> >> >> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for >> these meetings, he is in Australia. >> >> >> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for >> those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a >> channel. >> >> >> >> Thanks everyone, >> >> Anita. >> >> >> >> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. >> >> Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to >> find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared >> towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is >> no time that will suit everyone. >> >> It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I >> am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition >> for space at that date >> + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have >> already >> booked the space on the wikipage). >> >> So barring further discussion, see you then! >> >> Thanks everyone, >> Anita. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anteaya at anteaya.info Tue Dec 9 06:50:24 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:50:24 -0700 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <54867F08.7070008@triniplex.com> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> <54866371.5090705@triniplex.com> <54867F08.7070008@triniplex.com> Message-ID: <54869BB0.7030202@anteaya.info> I'm not doing alternating meetings. I am doing additional meetings as I always said I would. I will be in channel at 0800 utc in #openstack-meeting on Tuesday. All are welcome to attend. Thank you, Anita. On 12/08/2014 09:48 PM, Steve Weston wrote: > Times are entered. Let the voting begin!! > > On 12/8/14 7:29 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote: >> Thanks Steve, you beat me to it by just a few minutes. :) Can you >> load up these times? >> >> I was going to propose the following (all UTC and on Wednesday, >> alternating weeks): >> A) 12:00 and 22:00 >> B) 13:00 and 02:00 >> C) 14:00 and 03:00 >> D) 15:00 and 04:00 >> >> These times would alternate weeks, for instance one week the first >> time, the next week the second time. >> >> Vote for your favorite from the above, A, B, C, D. >> >> Thanks everyone! >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Steve Weston >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I have summarized the responses so far in a Google spreadsheet >> document [1]. >> >> Looks like the consensus has converged on alternating meetings, in >> UTC: >> >> Week 1 - Mondays 1800 or 1300 >> Week 2 - Tuesdays 0800 >> >> I would be agreeable to moving the Monday meeting to Wednesday, >> and alternating as Kurt suggested. I have set up a Google >> moderator page [2] so that all interested parties can provide >> their input for a final tally. >> >> [1] >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1glmZirKpp1wGvcJ0Zx35IkmJ23CSpfq2NoAK3_vW6b8/pubhtml >> >> [2] https://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=21b93c >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Weston >> Triniplex >> >> On 12/8/14 5:48 AM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com >> wrote: >>> >>> With Kurt Taylor. +1 >>> >>> Very nice idea to start with. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>> >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com| extn: 4048 >>> >>> *From:*Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM >>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >>> questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] >>> [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party >>> >>> In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the >>> table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of >>> 1800UTC on Monday and, also in the same week, to have another >>> meeting at 0800 UTC on Tuesday. >>> >>> Here are some of the problems that I see with this approach: >>> >>> 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is >>> needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't >>> enough meeting content to justify having two meetings every week. >>> >>> 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially >>> be undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will >>> be difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work >>> group. >>> >>> 3. Meeting chair(s): Currently we do not have a commitment for a >>> long-term chair of this new second weekly meeting. I will not be >>> able to attend this new meeting at the proposed time. >>> >>> 4. Current meeting time: I am not aware of anyone that likes the >>> current time of 1800 UTC on Monday. The current time is the main >>> reason it is hard for EU and APAC CI Operators to attend. >>> >>> My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating >>> times, just as other work groups have done to solve this problem. >>> (See examples at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I >>> volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the >>> meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between >>> 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, >>> the next week for APAC. >>> >>> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:10 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com >>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> +1. >>> >>> -- >>> Trinath Somanchi - B39208 >>> trinath.somanchi at freescale.com >>> | extn: 4048 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info >>> ] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:55 AM >>> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] >>> [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party >>> >>> On 12/03/2014 03:15 AM, Omri Marcovitch wrote: >>> > Hello Anteaya, >>> > >>> > A meeting between 8:00 - 16:00 UTC time will be great >>> (Israel). >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Omri >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Joshua Hesketh [mailto:joshua.hesketh at rackspace.com >>> ] >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:04 AM >>> > To: He, Yongli; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for >>> usage >>> > questions); openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] >>> [third-party]Time for >>> > Additional Meeting for third-party >>> > >>> > Hey, >>> > >>> > 0700 -> 1000 UTC would work for me most weeks fwiw. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Josh >>> > >>> > Rackspace Australia >>> > >>> > On 12/3/14 11:17 AM, He, Yongli wrote: >>> >> anteaya, >>> >> >>> >> UTC 7:00 AM to UTC9:00, or UTC11:30 to UTC13:00 is ideal >>> time for china. >>> >> >>> >> if there is no time slot there, just pick up any time >>> between UTC >>> >> 7:00 AM to UCT 13:00. ( UTC9:00 to UTC 11:30 is on road to >>> home and >>> >> dinner.) >>> >> >>> >> Yongi He >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:anteaya at anteaya.info >>> ] >>> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 AM >>> >> To: openstack Development Mailing List; >>> >> openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional >>> Meeting for >>> >> third-party >>> >> >>> >> One of the actions from the Kilo Third-Party CI summit >>> session was to start up an additional meeting for CI >>> operators to participate from non-North American time zones. >>> >> >>> >> Please reply to this email with times/days that would work >>> for you. The current third party meeting is on Mondays at >>> 1800 utc which works well since Infra meetings are on >>> Tuesdays. If we could find a time that works for Europe and >>> APAC that is also on Monday that would be ideal. >>> >> >>> >> Josh Hesketh has said he will try to be available for >>> these meetings, he is in Australia. >>> >> >>> >> Let's get a sense of what days and timeframes work for >>> those interested and then we can narrow it down and pick a >>> channel. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks everyone, >>> >> Anita. >>> >> >>> >>> Okay first of all thanks to everyone who replied. >>> >>> Again, to clarify, the purpose of this thread has been to >>> find a suitable additional third-party meeting time geared >>> towards folks in EU and APAC. We live on a sphere, there is >>> no time that will suit everyone. >>> >>> It looks like we are converging on 0800 UTC as a time and I >>> am going to suggest Tuesdays. We have very little competition >>> for space at that date >>> + time combination so we can use #openstack-meeting (I have >>> already >>> booked the space on the wikipage). >>> >>> So barring further discussion, see you then! >>> >>> Thanks everyone, >>> Anita. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >>> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > From dbailey at hp.com Tue Dec 9 11:13:13 2014 From: dbailey at hp.com (Bailey, Darragh) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:13:13 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5486D947.4090209@hp.com> Hi Eduard, I would check the trigger settings in the job, particularly which "type" of pattern matching is being used for the branches. Found it tends to be the spot that catches most people out when configuring jobs with the Gerrit Trigger plugin. If you're looking to trigger against all branches then you would want "Type: Path" and "Pattern: **" appearing in the UI. If you have sufficient access using the 'Query and Trigger Gerrit Patches' page accessible from the main view will make it easier to confirm that your Jenkins instance can actually see changes in gerrit for the given project (which should mean that it can see the corresponding events as well). Can also use the same page to re-trigger for PatchsetCreated events to see if you've set the patterns on the job correctly. Regards, Darragh Bailey "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - Unknown On 08/12/14 14:33, Eduard Matei wrote: > Resending this to dev ML as it seems i get quicker response :) > > I created a job in Jenkins, added as Build Trigger: "Gerrit Event: > Patchset Created", chose as server the configured Gerrit server that > was previously tested, then added the project openstack-dev/sandbox > and saved. > I made a change on dev sandbox repo but couldn't trigger my job. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Eduard > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Eduard Matei > > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Thanks to the latest changes to the creation of service accounts > process we're one step closer to setting up our own CI platform > for Cinder. > > So far we've got: > - Jenkins master (with Gerrit plugin) and slave (with DevStack and > our storage solution) > - Service account configured and tested (can manually connect to > review.openstack.org and get events > and publish comments) > > Next step would be to set up a job to do the actual testing, this > is where we're stuck. > Can someone please point us to a clear example on how a job should > look like (preferably for testing Cinder on Kilo)? Most links > we've found are broken, or tools/scripts are no longer working. > Also, we cannot change the Jenkins master too much (it's owned by > Ops team and they need a list of tools/scripts to review before > installing/running so we're not allowed to experiment). > > Thanks, > Eduard > > -- > > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > www.cloudfounders.com > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > Disclaimer: > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > they are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an > employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the > named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not > authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this > message or any part of it. If you have received this email in > error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete > all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended > recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not > accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of > this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage > suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > > > -- > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > www.cloudfounders.com > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > Disclaimer: > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an employee or > agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, > you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you > have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply > e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are > not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, > distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or > contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for > any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have > no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise > as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Tue Dec 9 11:59:15 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:59:15 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI In-Reply-To: <5486D947.4090209@hp.com> References: <5486D947.4090209@hp.com> Message-ID: Hi Darragh, thanks for your input I double checked the job settings and fixed it: - build triggers is set to Gerrit event - Gerrit trigger server is "Gerrit" (configured from Gerrit Trigger Plugin and tested separately) - Trigger on: Patchset Created - Gerrit Project: Type: Path, Pattern openstack-dev/sandbox, Branches: Type: Path, Pattern: ** (was Type Plain on both) Now the job is triggered by commit on openstack-dev/sandbox :) Regarding the Query and Trigger Gerrit Patches, i found my patch using query: status:open project:openstack-dev/sandbox change:139585 and i can trigger it manually and it executes the job. But i still have the problem: what should the job do? It doesn't actually do anything, it doesn't run tests or comment on the patch. Do you have an example of job? Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bailey, Darragh wrote: > Hi Eduard, > > > I would check the trigger settings in the job, particularly which "type" > of pattern matching is being used for the branches. Found it tends to be > the spot that catches most people out when configuring jobs with the > Gerrit Trigger plugin. If you're looking to trigger against all branches > then you would want "Type: Path" and "Pattern: **" appearing in the UI. > > If you have sufficient access using the 'Query and Trigger Gerrit > Patches' page accessible from the main view will make it easier to > confirm that your Jenkins instance can actually see changes in gerrit > for the given project (which should mean that it can see the > corresponding events as well). Can also use the same page to re-trigger > for PatchsetCreated events to see if you've set the patterns on the job > correctly. > > Regards, > Darragh Bailey > > "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - Unknown > > On 08/12/14 14:33, Eduard Matei wrote: > > Resending this to dev ML as it seems i get quicker response :) > > > > I created a job in Jenkins, added as Build Trigger: "Gerrit Event: > > Patchset Created", chose as server the configured Gerrit server that > > was previously tested, then added the project openstack-dev/sandbox > > and saved. > > I made a change on dev sandbox repo but couldn't trigger my job. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > Eduard > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Eduard Matei > > > > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Thanks to the latest changes to the creation of service accounts > > process we're one step closer to setting up our own CI platform > > for Cinder. > > > > So far we've got: > > - Jenkins master (with Gerrit plugin) and slave (with DevStack and > > our storage solution) > > - Service account configured and tested (can manually connect to > > review.openstack.org and get events > > and publish comments) > > > > Next step would be to set up a job to do the actual testing, this > > is where we're stuck. > > Can someone please point us to a clear example on how a job should > > look like (preferably for testing Cinder on Kilo)? Most links > > we've found are broken, or tools/scripts are no longer working. > > Also, we cannot change the Jenkins master too much (it's owned by > > Ops team and they need a list of tools/scripts to review before > > installing/running so we're not allowed to experiment). > > > > Thanks, > > Eduard > > > > -- > > > > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > > www.cloudfounders.com > > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > > > > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > > > Disclaimer: > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > > they are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an > > employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the > > named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not > > authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this > > message or any part of it. If you have received this email in > > error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete > > all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended > > recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > > or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be > > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be > > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > > incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not > > accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of > > this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage > > suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > > www.cloudfounders.com > > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > > > > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > > > Disclaimer: > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > > are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an employee or > > agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, > > you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, > > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you > > have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply > > e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are > > not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, > > distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be > > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be > > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or > > contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for > > any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have > > no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise > > as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Tue Dec 9 14:53:30 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:53:30 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI]Cannot see comments on Gerrit Message-ID: Hi, I've created a CI testing account, i can use it to connect to Gerrit and read the stream, and i tried to add a comment to a dev/sandbox patchset. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139585/ I can see the CI in the Reviewer column but i can't see the comment. This is the command i used: (from jenkins job) sudo -u cinder ssh -p 29418 cloudfoundersci at review.openstack.org gerrit review -m '"CloudFounders OpenvStorageCI Testing noop"' 9f0d93bf3bcf84beecafc3ac647179b1d690b828 Thanks, Eduard -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgagne at iweb.com Tue Dec 9 15:17:32 2014 From: mgagne at iweb.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Mathieu_Gagn=c3=a9?=) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:17:32 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI]Cannot see comments on Gerrit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5487128C.5090702@iweb.com> On 2014-12-09 9:53 AM, Eduard Matei wrote: > I can see the CI in the Reviewer column but i can't see the comment. Click "Toggle CI" at the bottom of the page. -- Mathieu From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Tue Dec 9 17:13:17 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:13:17 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI]Cannot see comments on Gerrit In-Reply-To: <5487128C.5090702@iweb.com> References: <5487128C.5090702@iweb.com> Message-ID: Aha, thanks ! Indeed it shows the comment. So now i just need to make the actual job. Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Mathieu Gagn? wrote: > On 2014-12-09 9:53 AM, Eduard Matei wrote: > >> I can see the CI in the Reviewer column but i can't see the comment. >> > > Click "Toggle CI" at the bottom of the page. > > -- > Mathieu > -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dougw at a10networks.com Tue Dec 9 17:19:33 2014 From: dougw at a10networks.com (Doug Wiegley) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:19:33 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI]Cannot see comments on Gerrit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Scroll down to the very bottom and click ?Toggle CI?, and you?ll see your comments. Also, I?d recommend moving queries of this sort to the third-party mailing list. Thanks, Doug From: Eduard Matei > Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM To: OpenStack > Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI]Cannot see comments on Gerrit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139585/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From timothy.e.cline at gmail.com Wed Dec 10 18:13:21 2014 From: timothy.e.cline at gmail.com (Timothy Cline) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:13:21 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] saml-generator group membership Message-ID: Would I be able to be added to the gerrit groups 'saml-generator-core' and 'saml-generator-release'? These groups were originally setup for the 'saml-generator' project created by a co-worked. However, he has left the project and nobody was added to these projects. I will be happy to supply more information if needed. Gerrit user information name: Timothy Cline email: timothy.e.cline at gmail.com Thanks, Timothy Cline -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Wed Dec 10 18:25:47 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:25:47 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] saml-generator group membership In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20141210182547.GW2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-10 12:13:21 -0600 (-0600), Timothy Cline wrote: > Would I be able to be added to the gerrit groups > 'saml-generator-core' and ' saml-generator-release'? These groups > were originally setup for the 'saml-generator' project created by > a co-worked. However, he has left the project and nobody was added > to these projects. I will be happy to supply more information if > needed. [...] The project seems to have been added in this commit: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/commit/?id=4dbd17c I've Cc'd the original proposer as notification of intent. If he replies positively (or not at all for a week) I'm happy to add you to the requested groups. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From psp0808 at gmail.com Wed Dec 10 07:34:36 2014 From: psp0808 at gmail.com (P Pradhan) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:04:36 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Creating a service account for CI testing Message-ID: Hi, We work for Openstack/ironic project. As we are trying/exploring to try third party CI testing, I read somewhere that we need a service account for this first? Could you please create one for us or let me know how one can be created? Regards, Pradhan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lyz at princessleia.com Wed Dec 10 18:40:43 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:40:43 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Creating a service account for CI testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:34 PM, P Pradhan wrote: > Hi, > > > > We work for Openstack/ironic project. > > As we are trying/exploring to try third party CI testing, I read somewhere > that we need a service account for this first? > > Could you please create one for us or let me know how one can be created? You can find the documentation about Third Party testing here: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html Specifically creating a service account is documented here: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account This is now self-service so you don't need to contact the infrastructure team to set it up. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From matt.kovacs at RACKSPACE.COM Wed Dec 10 19:27:06 2014 From: matt.kovacs at RACKSPACE.COM (Matt Kovacs) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:27:06 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] saml-generator group membership In-Reply-To: <20141210182547.GW2497@yuggoth.org> References: <20141210182547.GW2497@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Yes please add Timothy Cline to those groups. Thanks, Matt Kovacs On 12/10/14 12:25 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2014-12-10 12:13:21 -0600 (-0600), Timothy Cline wrote: >> Would I be able to be added to the gerrit groups >> 'saml-generator-core' and ' saml-generator-release'? These groups >> were originally setup for the 'saml-generator' project created by >> a co-worked. However, he has left the project and nobody was added >> to these projects. I will be happy to supply more information if >> needed. >[...] > >The project seems to have been added in this commit: > >http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/commit/?id=4d >bd17c > >I've Cc'd the original proposer as notification of intent. If he >replies positively (or not at all for a week) I'm happy to add you >to the requested groups. >-- >Jeremy Stanley From fungi at yuggoth.org Wed Dec 10 20:43:20 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:43:20 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] saml-generator group membership In-Reply-To: References: <20141210182547.GW2497@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <20141210204319.GX2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-10 19:27:06 +0000 (+0000), Matt Kovacs wrote: > Yes please add Timothy Cline to those groups. Done--thanks for the quick response! -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ricardo.carrillo.cruz at gmail.com Thu Dec 11 11:49:39 2014 From: ricardo.carrillo.cruz at gmail.com (Ricardo Carrillo Cruz) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:49:39 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-infra][jeepyb] Deprecating jeepyb-gerrit update_bug.py hook Message-ID: Hi there I was writing a spec for an issue tracker agnostic update_bug.py on Jeepyb when this Story comment from Khai came to my attention: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000012 " We should probably just deprecate jeepyb at this point. The Gerrit <-> Storyboard integrations should be done with a gerrit plugin and a storyboard plugin. I'm working on the Gerrit plugin and it's currently hosted upstream, initial change is here: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60590 " Has this deprecation been agreed in a meeting or in the IRC channel? Don't want to continue with the jeepyb work if we will switch to a Gerrit-SB plugin solution. Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jaypipes at gmail.com Thu Dec 11 13:03:45 2014 From: jaypipes at gmail.com (Jay Pipes) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:03:45 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-infra][jeepyb] Deprecating jeepyb-gerrit update_bug.py hook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <54899631.7050301@gmail.com> On 12/11/2014 06:49 AM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz wrote: > Hi there > > I was writing a spec for an issue tracker agnostic update_bug.py on > Jeepyb when this Story comment from Khai came to my attention: > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000012 > > " > We should probably just deprecate jeepyb at this point. The Gerrit <-> > Storyboard integrations should be done with a gerrit plugin and a > storyboard plugin. I'm working on the Gerrit plugin and it's currently > hosted upstream, initial change is here: > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60590 > " > > Has this deprecation been agreed in a meeting or in the IRC channel? > > Don't want to continue with the jeepyb work if we will switch to a > Gerrit-SB plugin solution. Personally, I think jeepyb is useful in its own right, with or without Storyboard, so I hope by "deprecation" Khai means just not using jeepyb within the OpenStack CI platform, and not getting rid of jeepyb. Best, -jay From corvus at inaugust.com Thu Dec 11 16:28:53 2014 From: corvus at inaugust.com (James E. Blair) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:28:53 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-infra][jeepyb] Deprecating jeepyb-gerrit update_bug.py hook In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Carrillo Cruz's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:49:39 +0100") References: Message-ID: <87y4qep2uy.fsf@meyer.lemoncheese.net> Ricardo Carrillo Cruz writes: > Hi there > > I was writing a spec for an issue tracker agnostic update_bug.py on Jeepyb > when this Story comment from Khai came to my attention: > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000012 > > " > We should probably just deprecate jeepyb at this point. The Gerrit <-> > Storyboard integrations should be done with a gerrit plugin and a > storyboard plugin. I'm working on the Gerrit plugin and it's currently > hosted upstream, initial change is here: > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60590 > " > > Has this deprecation been agreed in a meeting or in the IRC channel? > > Don't want to continue with the jeepyb work if we will switch to a > Gerrit-SB plugin solution. This seems like a great thing to talk about at next week's meeting. Khai, would you please add it to the agenda? -Jim From naggappan at gmail.com Thu Dec 11 07:17:06 2014 From: naggappan at gmail.com (Naggappan Rm) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:47:06 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] zuul gives Exception on ssh event stream: Message-ID: Hi Team, I am trying to set up a CI system. And I used the existing puppet modules and were able to successfully install the jenkins,zuul . When i start the zuul i get the following error, jenkins at jenkins-virtual-machine:~$ tailf /var/log/zuul/zuul.log key_filename=self.keyfile) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/client.py", line 251, in connect retry_on_signal(lambda: sock.connect(addr)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/util.py", line 278, in retry_on_signal return function() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/client.py", line 251, in retry_on_signal(lambda: sock.connect(addr)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 111] Connection refused 2014-12-10 22:28:57,352 ERROR gerrit.GerritWatcher: Exception on ssh event stream: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/zuul/lib/gerrit.py", line 64, in _run key_filename=self.keyfile) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/client.py", line 251, in connect retry_on_signal(lambda: sock.connect(addr)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/util.py", line 278, in retry_on_signal return function() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko/client.py", line 251, in retry_on_signal(lambda: sock.connect(addr)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 111] Connection refused *Note I have done the following steps to make sure that connection is propper :* * suod su - zuul * ssh -i /var/lib/zuul/ssh/id_rsa -p 29418 ib-ipam-ci at review.openstack.org gerrit stream-events * It makes sure that the key is proper and communication is also propper * Also i did sudo service zuul-manager stop;sudo service zuul stop * rm -rf /var/log/zuul/* * sudo service zuul-manager start;sudo service zuul start *Still i get the same error * I have tried this in ubuntu 12.04 and ubuntu 14.04 My zuul.conf as follows, (i have not used baseurl but i guess that might also require) [gearman] server=127.0.0.1 [gearman_server] start=true log_config=/etc/zuul/gearman-logging.conf [gerrit] server=review.openstack.org user=ib-ipam-ci sshkey=/var/lib/zuul/ssh/id_rsa #baseurl=what? [zuul] layout_config=/etc/zuul/layout/layout.yaml log_config=/etc/zuul/logging.conf state_dir=/var/lib/zuul git_dir=/var/lib/zuul/git url_pattern= status_url=http://http://10.39.18.26/IB_IPAM_REPORT//zuul/status job_name_in_report=true zuul_url= [merger] git_dir=/var/lib/zuul/git zuul_url= log_config=/etc/zuul/merger-logging.conf git_user_email=testing at myvendor.com git_user_name=MyVendor Jenkins [smtp] server=localhost port=25 default_from=zuul at jenkins-virtual-machine default_to=zuul.reports at jenkins-virtual-machine Regards, Naggappan Rm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zaro0508 at gmail.com Thu Dec 11 17:42:23 2014 From: zaro0508 at gmail.com (Zaro) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:42:23 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-infra][jeepyb] Deprecating jeepyb-gerrit update_bug.py hook In-Reply-To: <87y4qep2uy.fsf@meyer.lemoncheese.net> References: <87y4qep2uy.fsf@meyer.lemoncheese.net> Message-ID: Right Jay, I don't mean git rid of it, just stop using it. I have added the topic to openstack-infra meeting agenda. -Khai On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:28 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Ricardo Carrillo Cruz writes: > > > Hi there > > > > I was writing a spec for an issue tracker agnostic update_bug.py on > Jeepyb > > when this Story comment from Khai came to my attention: > > > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000012 > > > > " > > We should probably just deprecate jeepyb at this point. The Gerrit <-> > > Storyboard integrations should be done with a gerrit plugin and a > > storyboard plugin. I'm working on the Gerrit plugin and it's currently > > hosted upstream, initial change is here: > > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60590 > > " > > > > Has this deprecation been agreed in a meeting or in the IRC channel? > > > > Don't want to continue with the jeepyb work if we will switch to a > > Gerrit-SB plugin solution. > > This seems like a great thing to talk about at next week's meeting. > Khai, would you please add it to the agenda? > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lyz at princessleia.com Thu Dec 11 22:26:48 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:26:48 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday Message-ID: Hi everyone, This is a busy week, so instead of jumping on in channel with this again I figured I'd bring it to the list and follow up at a meeting. As mentioned earlier in channel, we have reviewday and now Nova has a more full-featured tool called Nova-Bugs currently hosted at http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html which is an AWS instance that is no longer free for the contributor, so they need to move it ASAP. Code here: https://github.com/tracyajones/nova_bugs Unfortunately, while there is a willingness from both Dan (reviewday) and Tracy (nova-bugs) to combine to the tools and work out how to optimize to deal with the slowness of Launchpad (reviewday takes about 12 minutes to run for all projects, nova-bugs takes 30 for just Nova), there is that time constraint of AWS cost. Can we toss this code up somewhere temporarily for Nova for now, and then go from there to work on integration/replacement for reviewday? If so, should we create a new project for this in openstack-infra or leave it on github for now until we can integrate features with reviewday? -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From mikal at stillhq.com Thu Dec 11 22:37:53 2014 From: mikal at stillhq.com (Michael Still) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:37:53 +1100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'd be happy to donate a Rackspace cloud instance to Tracy to keep this running for a while if needed, although presumably infra could do that same thing... Cheers, Michael On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a busy week, so instead of jumping on in channel with this > again I figured I'd bring it to the list and follow up at a meeting. > > As mentioned earlier in channel, we have reviewday and now Nova has a > more full-featured tool called Nova-Bugs currently hosted at > http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html which is an AWS instance that is > no longer free for the contributor, so they need to move it ASAP. > > Code here: https://github.com/tracyajones/nova_bugs > > Unfortunately, while there is a willingness from both Dan (reviewday) > and Tracy (nova-bugs) to combine to the tools and work out how to > optimize to deal with the slowness of Launchpad (reviewday takes about > 12 minutes to run for all projects, nova-bugs takes 30 for just Nova), > there is that time constraint of AWS cost. > > Can we toss this code up somewhere temporarily for Nova for now, and > then go from there to work on integration/replacement for reviewday? > If so, should we create a new project for this in openstack-infra or > leave it on github for now until we can integrate features with > reviewday? > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Rackspace Australia From sukhdevkapur at gmail.com Fri Dec 12 02:10:18 2014 From: sukhdevkapur at gmail.com (Sukhdev Kapur) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:10:18 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] devstack failed './stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api' In-Reply-To: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> References: <2766FDEB4D6EC647B5ED0A96096A2C3735D1FAE9F8@MX10A.corp.emc.com> Message-ID: If you guys are still having this issue, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.concurrency/+bug/1400384 A fix has been released as well I posted a fix as well. regards.. -Sukhdev On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Wan, Sam wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Our CI failed at devstack setup. > > The error messages in devstacklog is as below: > > 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | ./stack.sh:1224:start_nova_api > > 2014-12-07 22:33:47.959 | /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701:die > > 2014-12-07 22:33:47.965 | [ERROR] /opt/stack/new/devstack/lib/nova:701 > nova-api did not start > > 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | exit_trap: cleaning up child processes > > 2014-12-07 22:33:48.970 | ./stack.sh: line 441: kill: (5161) - No such > process > > 2014-12-07 22:33:48.971 | Error on exit > > 2014-12-07 22:33:49.019 | World dumping... see > /opt/stack/new/worlddump-2014-12-07-223349.txt for details > > 2014-12-07 22:33:49.086 | ./stack.sh: line 434: 428 > Terminated _old_run_process "$service" "$command" > > > > Seems there?s something wrong with nova-api. > > Has someone met this too? > > Any suggestion or clue will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks and regards > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > *| **Wan Shan (Sam)* > > *| **Openstack Certification **| **EMC* *E-Lab* > > *| **Tel: +86-28-82966713 <%2B86-28-82966713>* > > *| **Addr: 7F, C12, Tianfu Software Park, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. of > China* > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From psp0808 at gmail.com Fri Dec 12 10:45:47 2014 From: psp0808 at gmail.com (P Pradhan) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:15:47 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Creating a service account for CI testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ya...got that :) Thanks Elizabeth. Regards, Pradhan On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:34 PM, P Pradhan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We work for Openstack/ironic project. > > > > As we are trying/exploring to try third party CI testing, I read > somewhere > > that we need a service account for this first? > > > > Could you please create one for us or let me know how one can be created? > > You can find the documentation about Third Party testing here: > http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html > > Specifically creating a service account is documented here: > http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account > > This is now self-service so you don't need to contact the > infrastructure team to set it up. > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 > -- Thanks & Regards, Pradhan Contact: (+91) 7667943631 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry at openstack.org Mon Dec 15 09:35:42 2014 From: thierry at openstack.org (Thierry Carrez) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:35:42 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Issue with swift 2.2.1.rc1 tarball creation (setuptools) Message-ID: <548EAB6E.7060902@openstack.org> Hi infra, I have been pushing the Swift 2.2.1.rc1 tag this morning in preparation for Swift 2.2.1 release this week, and it resulted in a swift-2.2.1c1.tar.gz tarball being generated (instead of the swift-2.2.1.rc1.tar.gz tarball that my scripts expected). Tracing back to the logs at: https://jenkins05.openstack.org/job/swift-tarball/1/consoleFull it appears that setuptools is warning against using 2.2.1.rc1 as a version, and then just takes 2.2.1c1 as version instead. So the "warning" is a bit... definitive: 2014-12-15 09:19:00.162 | venv runtests: commands[0] | python setup.py sdist 2014-12-15 09:19:00.561 | /home/jenkins/workspace/swift-tarball/.tox/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:289: UserWarning: The version specified requires normalization, consider using '2.2.1c1' instead of '2.2.1.rc1'. [...] 2014-12-15 09:19:00.948 | running check 2014-12-15 09:19:00.948 | creating swift-2.2.1c1 2014-12-15 09:19:00.949 | creating swift-2.2.1c1/bin At this point I have the tag in git and no tarball to upload to Launchpad and announce. Let me know what I can do (should we remove and re-tag with something different ? should we fix the -tarball job and retrigger it manually ?) Staying put, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) From lyz at princessleia.com Mon Dec 15 18:41:12 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:41:12 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 16th at 19:00 UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday December 16th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend. Meeting log and minutes from the last meeting are available here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.txt Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.log.html -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From lyz at princessleia.com Mon Dec 15 21:05:28 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:05:28 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Michael Still wrote: > I'd be happy to donate a Rackspace cloud instance to Tracy to keep > this running for a while if needed, although presumably infra could do > that same thing... Thanks for the offer, Michael. I've added this to the team agenda for our meeting on Tuesday and hopefully we will be able to decide then whether to take you up on it :) -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From stefano at openstack.org Tue Dec 16 01:07:20 2014 From: stefano at openstack.org (Stefano Maffulli) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:07:20 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> Message-ID: <548F85C8.6020400@openstack.org> On 12/05/2014 07:08 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at > this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content > to justify having two meetings every week. I'd like to discuss this further: the stated objectives of the meetings are very wide and may allow for more than one slot per week. In particular I'm seeing the two below as good candidates for 'meet as many times as possible': * to provide a forum for the curious and for OpenStack programs who are not yet in this space but may be in the future * to encourage questions from third party folks and support the sourcing of answers https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty#Goals_for_Third_Party_meetings > 2. Decisions: Any decision made at one meeting will potentially be > undone at the next, or at least not fully explained. It will be > difficult to keep consistent direction with the overall work group. I think this needs to be clarified for all teams, not just third-party: I disagree that important decisions should be taken on IRC. IRC is the place where discussions happen and agreements may form among a group of people, but ultimately the communication and the actual *decision* needs to happen on the wider email list channel. > My proposal was to have only 1 meeting per week at alternating times, [...] I'm not going to enter into the specific, as I'm sure you're already aware and weighted the disadvantages of alternating times and multiple dates. Only I'd ask you to communicate clearly times and objectives on the team's and meetings wiki pages. There are now three slots listed: Mondays at 1500 UTC, chair Anita Mondays at 1800 UTC, chair (I'm assuming it's Kurt) Tuesdays at 0800 UTC, chair Anita I would suggest you to make an effort to split the agenda across the three slots, if you think it's possible, or assign priority topics from the stated goals of the meetings so that people will know what to expect each time. The objective of the meetings should be to engage more people in different timezones, while avoiding confusion. Let me know if you need help editing the pages. As I mentioned above, probably one way to do this is to make some slots more focused on engaging newcomers and answering questions, more like serendipitous mentoring sessions with the less involved, while another slot could be dedicated to more focused and long term efforts, with more committed people? Cheers, stef PS let's continue the conversation only on -infra. I'm replying including -dev only because I think the point "2. Decisions" needed to be clarified for all. From liuxinguo at huawei.com Tue Dec 16 01:18:06 2014 From: liuxinguo at huawei.com (liuxinguo) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:18:06 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] zuul.Gearman: Looking for lost builds Message-ID: In /var/log/zuul/debug.log, I always see lots of message like this? zuul.Gearman: Looking for lost builds? And then I need to restart zuul. Anyone have met this? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com Tue Dec 16 08:41:06 2014 From: eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com (Eduard Matei) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:41:06 +0200 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI In-Reply-To: References: <5486D947.4090209@hp.com> Message-ID: Hi, Can someone point me to some working documentation on how to setup third party CI? (joinfu's instructions don't seem to work, and manually running devstack-gate scripts fails: Running gate_hook Job timeout set to: 163 minutes timeout: failed to run command ?/opt/stack/new/devstack-gate/devstack-vm-gate.sh?: No such file or directory ERROR: the main setup script run by this job failed - exit code: 127 please look at the relevant log files to determine the root cause Cleaning up host ... this takes 3 - 4 minutes (logs at logs/devstack-gate-cleanup-host.txt.gz) Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure. I have a working Jenkins slave with devstack and our internal libraries, i have Gerrit Trigger Plugin working and triggering on patches created, i just need the actual job contents so that it can get to comment with the test results. Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Eduard Matei wrote: > Hi Darragh, thanks for your input > > I double checked the job settings and fixed it: > - build triggers is set to Gerrit event > - Gerrit trigger server is "Gerrit" (configured from Gerrit Trigger Plugin > and tested separately) > - Trigger on: Patchset Created > - Gerrit Project: Type: Path, Pattern openstack-dev/sandbox, Branches: > Type: Path, Pattern: ** (was Type Plain on both) > Now the job is triggered by commit on openstack-dev/sandbox :) > > Regarding the Query and Trigger Gerrit Patches, i found my patch using > query: status:open project:openstack-dev/sandbox change:139585 and i can > trigger it manually and it executes the job. > > But i still have the problem: what should the job do? It doesn't actually > do anything, it doesn't run tests or comment on the patch. > Do you have an example of job? > > Thanks, > Eduard > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bailey, Darragh wrote: > >> Hi Eduard, >> >> >> I would check the trigger settings in the job, particularly which "type" >> of pattern matching is being used for the branches. Found it tends to be >> the spot that catches most people out when configuring jobs with the >> Gerrit Trigger plugin. If you're looking to trigger against all branches >> then you would want "Type: Path" and "Pattern: **" appearing in the UI. >> >> If you have sufficient access using the 'Query and Trigger Gerrit >> Patches' page accessible from the main view will make it easier to >> confirm that your Jenkins instance can actually see changes in gerrit >> for the given project (which should mean that it can see the >> corresponding events as well). Can also use the same page to re-trigger >> for PatchsetCreated events to see if you've set the patterns on the job >> correctly. >> >> Regards, >> Darragh Bailey >> >> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - Unknown >> >> On 08/12/14 14:33, Eduard Matei wrote: >> > Resending this to dev ML as it seems i get quicker response :) >> > >> > I created a job in Jenkins, added as Build Trigger: "Gerrit Event: >> > Patchset Created", chose as server the configured Gerrit server that >> > was previously tested, then added the project openstack-dev/sandbox >> > and saved. >> > I made a change on dev sandbox repo but couldn't trigger my job. >> > >> > Any ideas? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eduard >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Eduard Matei >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > Thanks to the latest changes to the creation of service accounts >> > process we're one step closer to setting up our own CI platform >> > for Cinder. >> > >> > So far we've got: >> > - Jenkins master (with Gerrit plugin) and slave (with DevStack and >> > our storage solution) >> > - Service account configured and tested (can manually connect to >> > review.openstack.org and get events >> > and publish comments) >> > >> > Next step would be to set up a job to do the actual testing, this >> > is where we're stuck. >> > Can someone please point us to a clear example on how a job should >> > look like (preferably for testing Cinder on Kilo)? Most links >> > we've found are broken, or tools/scripts are no longer working. >> > Also, we cannot change the Jenkins master too much (it's owned by >> > Ops team and they need a list of tools/scripts to review before >> > installing/running so we're not allowed to experiment). >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eduard >> > >> > -- >> > >> > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* >> > www.cloudfounders.com >> > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* >> > >> > Disclaimer: >> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom >> > they are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an >> > employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the >> > named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not >> > authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this >> > message or any part of it. If you have received this email in >> > error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete >> > all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended >> > recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing >> > or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this >> > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be >> > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be >> > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or >> > incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not >> > accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of >> > this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage >> > suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail >> transmission. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* >> > www.cloudfounders.com >> > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* >> > >> > Disclaimer: >> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> > are addressed.If you are not the named addressee or an employee or >> > agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, >> > you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, >> > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you >> > have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply >> > e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are >> > not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, >> > distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this >> > information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be >> > guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be >> > intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or >> > contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for >> > any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have >> > no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise >> > as a result of e-mail transmission. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > -- > > *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* > www.cloudfounders.com > | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com > > > > *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* > > Disclaimer: > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > > -- *Eduard Biceri Matei, Senior Software Developer* www.cloudfounders.com | eduard.matei at cloudfounders.com *CloudFounders, The Private Cloud Software Company* Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this email in error we request you to notify us by reply e-mail and to delete all electronic files of the message. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, and shall have no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the user, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 17:38:45 2014 From: kurt.r.taylor at gmail.com (Kurt Taylor) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:38:45 -0600 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party In-Reply-To: <548F85C8.6020400@openstack.org> References: <547CCA69.4000909@anteaya.info> <837B116B6E5B934DA06D9AD0FD79C6A3018E9C60@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <547EB5C9.8020008@rackspace.com> <547F8DC1.5000202@anteaya.info> <548F85C8.6020400@openstack.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > > On 12/05/2014 07:08 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > > 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at > > this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content > > to justify having two meetings every week. > > I'd like to discuss this further: the stated objectives of the meetings > are very wide and may allow for more than one slot per week. In > particular I'm seeing the two below as good candidates for 'meet as many > times as possible': > > * to provide a forum for the curious and for OpenStack programs who > are not yet in this space but may be in the future > * to encourage questions from third party folks and support the > sourcing of answers > > > > As I mentioned above, probably one way to do this is to make some slots > more focused on engaging newcomers and answering questions, more like > serendipitous mentoring sessions with the less involved, while another > slot could be dedicated to more focused and long term efforts, with more > committed people? > This is an excellent idea, let's split the meetings into: 1) Mentoring - mentoring new CI team members and operators, help them understand infra tools and processes. Anita can continue her fantastic work here. 2) Working Group - working meeting for documentation, reviewing patches for relevant work, and improving the consumability of infra CI components. I will be happy to chair these meetings initially. I am sure I can get help with these meetings for the other time zones also. With this approach we can also continue to use the new meeting times voted on by the group, and each is focused on targeting a specific group with very different needs. Thanks Stefano! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lyz at princessleia.com Tue Dec 16 20:17:27 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:17:27 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: So we didn't get to it during the meeting, but had a quick chat afterwards and decided: On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Can we toss this code up somewhere temporarily for Nova for now, and > then go from there to work on integration/replacement for reviewday? Yes. > If so, should we create a new project for this in openstack-infra or > leave it on github for now until we can integrate features with > reviewday? Leave it on github. Now, we do need someone to do the Puppet work to get it into infra. While I'm happy to help, I can't jump on this immediately to do it myself right now, maybe after the holidays. If someone else can do this, what we'll need is a new module similar to reviewday: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/reviewday And I imagine we'd put it on status.openstack.org, so we'll need to add the config too, similar to how we did reviewday: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/openstack_project/manifests/status.pp#n214 I'm happy to review+test these changes. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From weidongshao at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 20:38:15 2014 From: weidongshao at gmail.com (Weidong Shao) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:38:15 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] How to file request for project group membership Message-ID: Hi I need to be in my project's release group (compass-release). Where do I file request for this? Thanks, Weidong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Tue Dec 16 20:57:30 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:57:30 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] How to file request for project group membership In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20141216205729.GX2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-16 20:38:15 +0000 (+0000), Weidong Shao wrote: > I need to be in my project's release group (compass-release). > Where do I file request for this? This E-mail is sufficient, but I can't add you to that group until it exists (it will be automatically created a few minutes after your Gerrit ACL change merges to introduce it). -- Jeremy Stanley From aj at suse.com Tue Dec 16 21:00:35 2014 From: aj at suse.com (Andreas Jaeger) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:00:35 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] How to file request for project group membership In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <54909D73.9000602@suse.com> On 12/16/2014 09:38 PM, Weidong Shao wrote: > Hi > I need to be in my project's release group (compass-release). Where do I > file request for this? There's one person already in the release group, talk with that person and ask to add you, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 From tjones at vmware.com Tue Dec 16 21:09:59 2014 From: tjones at vmware.com (Tracy Jones) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:09:59 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: <1159E9E8-56FC-49EF-BE54-43054F636D80@vmware.com> I'm happy to help do the work if you want. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 16, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > > So we didn't get to it during the meeting, but had a quick chat > afterwards and decided: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph > wrote: >> Can we toss this code up somewhere temporarily for Nova for now, and >> then go from there to work on integration/replacement for reviewday? > > Yes. > >> If so, should we create a new project for this in openstack-infra or >> leave it on github for now until we can integrate features with >> reviewday? > > Leave it on github. > > Now, we do need someone to do the Puppet work to get it into infra. > While I'm happy to help, I can't jump on this immediately to do it > myself right now, maybe after the holidays. > > If someone else can do this, what we'll need is a new module similar > to reviewday: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/reviewday > > And I imagine we'd put it on status.openstack.org, so we'll need to > add the config too, similar to how we did reviewday: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/openstack_project/manifests/status.pp#n214 > > I'm happy to review+test these changes. > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From lyz at princessleia.com Tue Dec 16 21:37:04 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:37:04 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: <1159E9E8-56FC-49EF-BE54-43054F636D80@vmware.com> References: <1159E9E8-56FC-49EF-BE54-43054F636D80@vmware.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Tracy Jones wrote: > I'm happy to help do the work if you want. That would be great, thanks Tracy. Feel free to poke around the examples I gave and I'd be happy to review once you have something. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From fungi at yuggoth.org Tue Dec 16 22:11:26 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:11:26 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] How to file request for project group membership In-Reply-To: <20141216205729.GX2497@yuggoth.org> References: <20141216205729.GX2497@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <20141216221126.GZ2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-16 20:57:30 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-12-16 20:38:15 +0000 (+0000), Weidong Shao wrote: > > I need to be in my project's release group (compass-release). > > Where do I file request for this? > > This E-mail is sufficient, but I can't add you to that group until > it exists (it will be automatically created a few minutes after your > Gerrit ACL change merges to introduce it). Ahh, yes as Andreas mentions later in this thread, you need to get the current member of https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/262,members to add you. -- Jeremy Stanley From weidongshao at gmail.com Tue Dec 16 22:12:05 2014 From: weidongshao at gmail.com (Weidong Shao) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:12:05 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] How to file request for project group membership References: <20141216205729.GX2497@yuggoth.org> <20141216221126.GZ2497@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Ok thanks! On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-12-16 20:57:30 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2014-12-16 20:38:15 +0000 (+0000), Weidong Shao wrote: > > > I need to be in my project's release group (compass-release). > > > Where do I file request for this? > > > > This E-mail is sufficient, but I can't add you to that group until > > it exists (it will be automatically created a few minutes after your > > Gerrit ACL change merges to introduce it). > > Ahh, yes as Andreas mentions later in this thread, you need to get > the current member of > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/262,members to add you. > -- > Jeremy Stanley > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tjones at vmware.com Tue Dec 16 22:13:36 2014 From: tjones at vmware.com (Tracy Jones) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:13:36 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Nova Bugs tool and Reviewday In-Reply-To: References: <1159E9E8-56FC-49EF-BE54-43054F636D80@vmware.com> Message-ID: <9ED919E5-0684-48E3-ABD3-82B152CA72CA@vmware.com> Ok I?m out of office this week but have a little time to poke around. If not this week next week for sure. Thanks! On 12/16/14, 1:37 PM, "Elizabeth K. Joseph" wrote: >On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Tracy Jones wrote: >> I'm happy to help do the work if you want. > >That would be great, thanks Tracy. Feel free to poke around the >examples I gave and I'd be happy to review once you have something. > >-- >Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From liuxinguo at huawei.com Wed Dec 17 01:35:50 2014 From: liuxinguo at huawei.com (liuxinguo) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:35:50 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Huawei Volume CI not in Cinder/third-party-ci-status Message-ID: Hi Duncan, I found that Huawei Volume CI is not in ?Cinder/third-party-ci-status??https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status But it?s in ?Group Third-Party CI?? https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/270,members Should I edit wiki page for ?Cinder/third-party-ci-status? my self to add Huawei Volume CI into it? Thanks and regards, liu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bigzhao at cisco.com Wed Dec 17 08:56:27 2014 From: bigzhao at cisco.com (Accela Zhao (bigzhao)) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:56:27 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [opensatck-dev] [Infra] Change in openstack/heat[stable/juno]: Updated from global requirements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi, Thank you for advising, Pavio! The proposal bot posted review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141597/) has similar issues with other components like nova (141601), ceilometer (41593), neutron (141600), glance (141596) and cinder (141594). There is also a related bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1402312) which affects me from installing devstack. Do you think it is a good idea and is there a way to add bug ref and relevant info into the commit message? Thanks & Regards, -- Accela Zhao On 12/17/14, 4:15 PM, "Pavlo Shchelokovskyy (Code Review)" wrote: >Pavlo Shchelokovskyy has posted comments on this change. > >Change subject: Updated from global requirements >...................................................................... > > >Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1 > >Accela, this is bot-driven, so changing the commit message is on Infra >team. > >-- >To view, visit https://review.openstack.org/141597 >To unsubscribe, visit https://review.openstack.org/settings > >Gerrit-MessageType: comment >Gerrit-Change-Id: I164fbd93140a0048c8173ae4187b9e8b882bdebb >Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 >Gerrit-Project: openstack/heat >Gerrit-Branch: stable/juno >Gerrit-Owner: OpenStack Proposal Bot >Gerrit-Reviewer: Accela Zhao >Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins >Gerrit-Reviewer: Pavlo Shchelokovskyy >Gerrit-HasComments: No From fungi at yuggoth.org Wed Dec 17 15:23:58 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:23:58 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [opensatck-dev] [Infra] Change in openstack/heat[stable/juno]: Updated from global requirements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20141217152358.GB2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-17 08:56:27 +0000 (+0000), Accela Zhao (bigzhao) wrote: [...] > is there a way to add bug ref and relevant info into the commit > message? You can check the history on the openstack/requirements project for relevant commit messages, but the proposed commit in each individual project doesn't necessarily map back to a single requirements project commit. Instead it's a sync of any outstanding differences in requirements files and so could relate to multiple different original commits which touched those specific entries. Including some filtered digest of `git blame global-requirements.txt` reversed to a concatenation of full commit messages is a possibility I suppose, but someone would need to find time to implement that. -- Jeremy Stanley From bigzhao at cisco.com Wed Dec 17 15:32:59 2014 From: bigzhao at cisco.com (Accela Zhao (bigzhao)) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:32:59 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [opensatck-dev] [Infra] Change in openstack/heat[stable/juno]: Updated from global requirements In-Reply-To: <20141217152358.GB2497@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Thank you, Jeremy! That's a good explanation. Thanks & Regards, -- Accela Zhao On 12/17/14, 11:23 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2014-12-17 08:56:27 +0000 (+0000), Accela Zhao (bigzhao) wrote: >[...] >> is there a way to add bug ref and relevant info into the commit >> message? > >You can check the history on the openstack/requirements project for >relevant commit messages, but the proposed commit in each individual >project doesn't necessarily map back to a single requirements >project commit. Instead it's a sync of any outstanding differences >in requirements files and so could relate to multiple different >original commits which touched those specific entries. Including >some filtered digest of `git blame global-requirements.txt` reversed >to a concatenation of full commit messages is a possibility I >suppose, but someone would need to find time to implement that. >-- >Jeremy Stanley From sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com Thu Dec 18 03:52:30 2014 From: sasikanth.eda at in.ibm.com (Sasikanth Eda) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:22:30 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Request for changing contact details for service accounts for ibm-gpfs-ci, ibm-ibmnas-ci Message-ID: Hi Team, Can you please help changing the Email-id's for the respective accounts; 1) Username: ibm-gpfs-ci old Email: rsandeep at in.ibm.com New Email: ibmgpfscinderci at in.ibm.com 2) Username: ibm-ibmnas-ci old Email: sasikeda at in.ibm.com New Email: ibmnascinderci at in.ibm.com I tried following the instructions http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account, but could not succeed. I guess this process is valid for new accounts. Is there any self-service process for old accounts. Regards, Sasi From: Sergey Lukjanov To: Sasikanth Eda/India/IBM at IBMIN Cc: "<,openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org>," , Jay S Bryant Date: 07/17/2014 07:14 PM Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request for service accounts for the 3rd party cinder driver (gpfs, ibmnas) testing Both accounts created and ready. On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Sasikanth Eda wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are working towards 3rd party cinder testing for IBM GPFS driver, IBMNAS > driver and would request two service accounts with the below noted details. > Kindly let us know if any other details are required and please do the > needful. > > For IBM GPFS Cinder driver: > > - Username: ibm-gpfs-ci > - Full name: IBM GPFS CI > - Company name: IBM > - Email: rsandeep at in.ibm.com > > - ssh-key (gpfs client): > > ssh-rsa > AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAvbnafd6F0hOOyhc3r/2q8rib69Zdq847fz7mWAvNSyW4SFdHGZEb > +z8PcaTNo26EBSysfPOQsuK > +a70gI5RRDPq4qloLtSKyTRW4Y/tTjwIIXsa//r16siL3cGpkM49zG/aLjUVyvaIh/cFMBe0X6Dvhmwq3eDpH7 > +MzkRsHoeU= > > For IBMNAS Cinder driver: > > - Username: ibm-ibmnas-ci > - Full name: IBM NAS CI > - Company name: IBM > - Email: sasikeda at in.ibm.com > > - ssh-key (ibmnas client): > > ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAuteh6nmC6D6El9FFMaZecBXa > +Hemto5oDVpEzR/YUPA8EhJeEbZxmjhEK8NXjyeQoVVVQQ/y > +o3rWal0GOoY/iJRB85qInegMcFS8E9KYlUqA8lW7s6hi6XOxBMEFrqKegeoeBZBrdP5 > +ox4MitWAPi93jjKN8xhY/JCmpjyje0= > > Regards, > Sasi > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara Technical Lead (OpenStack Data Processing) Principal Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. From anteaya at anteaya.info Thu Dec 18 16:28:28 2014 From: anteaya at anteaya.info (Anita Kuno) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:28:28 -0500 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Request for changing contact details for service accounts for ibm-gpfs-ci, ibm-ibmnas-ci In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <549300AC.7020400@anteaya.info> On 12/17/2014 10:52 PM, Sasikanth Eda wrote: > > Hi Team, > > Can you please help changing the Email-id's for the respective accounts; > > 1) Username: ibm-gpfs-ci > old Email: rsandeep at in.ibm.com > New Email: ibmgpfscinderci at in.ibm.com > > 2) Username: ibm-ibmnas-ci > old Email: sasikeda at in.ibm.com > New Email: ibmnascinderci at in.ibm.com > > I tried following the instructions > http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account, but > could not succeed. I guess this process is valid for new accounts. Is there > any self-service process for old accounts. > > Regards, > Sasi Hello Sasi: The only process we have to editing information is for you to create new accounts using the self-service process you linked to above with the new information. That way you can edit the information on those accounts as you need to do. Gerrit requires unique email addresses for all its accounts, in this case that does not present a problem because the emails you wish to be associated with your CI accounts are new. Please go ahead and create new accounts using the self-serve process with the updated information associated with them. Note that this will result in having a new SSH username, so you'll need to update your configuration accordingly. We would like to clean up old accounts that are no longer in use, once you have created new accounts please reply to this post with the names of the old accounts so that we can deactivate them. Thank you Sasi, Anita. > > > > From: Sergey Lukjanov > To: Sasikanth Eda/India/IBM at IBMIN > Cc: "<,openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org>," > , Jay S Bryant > > Date: 07/17/2014 07:14 PM > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Request for service accounts for the 3rd > party cinder driver (gpfs, ibmnas) testing > > > > Both accounts created and ready. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Sasikanth Eda > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> We are working towards 3rd party cinder testing for IBM GPFS driver, > IBMNAS >> driver and would request two service accounts with the below noted > details. >> Kindly let us know if any other details are required and please do the >> needful. >> >> For IBM GPFS Cinder driver: >> >> - Username: ibm-gpfs-ci >> - Full name: IBM GPFS CI >> - Company name: IBM >> - Email: rsandeep at in.ibm.com >> >> - ssh-key (gpfs client): >> >> ssh-rsa >> > AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAvbnafd6F0hOOyhc3r/2q8rib69Zdq847fz7mWAvNSyW4SFdHGZEb > >> +z8PcaTNo26EBSysfPOQsuK >> > +a70gI5RRDPq4qloLtSKyTRW4Y/tTjwIIXsa//r16siL3cGpkM49zG/aLjUVyvaIh/cFMBe0X6Dvhmwq3eDpH7 > >> +MzkRsHoeU= >> >> For IBMNAS Cinder driver: >> >> - Username: ibm-ibmnas-ci >> - Full name: IBM NAS CI >> - Company name: IBM >> - Email: sasikeda at in.ibm.com >> >> - ssh-key (ibmnas client): >> >> ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAuteh6nmC6D6El9FFMaZecBXa >> +Hemto5oDVpEzR/YUPA8EhJeEbZxmjhEK8NXjyeQoVVVQQ/y >> +o3rWal0GOoY/iJRB85qInegMcFS8E9KYlUqA8lW7s6hi6XOxBMEFrqKegeoeBZBrdP5 >> +ox4MitWAPi93jjKN8xhY/JCmpjyje0= >> >> Regards, >> Sasi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Sergey Lukjanov > Sahara Technical Lead > (OpenStack Data Processing) > Principal Software Engineer > Mirantis Inc. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > From bharat.kobagana at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 05:29:09 2014 From: bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:59:09 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting to delete duplicate account In-Reply-To: <54964F30.4090503@redhat.com> References: <54964F30.4090503@redhat.com> Message-ID: <54965AA5.1070806@redhat.com> Hi All, I have multiple accounts with the same email ID and name, please find the attached Screen Shot(MultipleAccounts.png) for more details. Because of this I am able to add as a review to the patch. Please find the Error.png for error message. Existing accounts: 1. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) 2. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) 3. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) 4. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) Also I found two entries with the same Email ID in "https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/324,members" I delete accounts in one.ubuntu.com but still I am facing the same issue. Please remove/deactivate all the accounts from Gerrit. I will create from the scratch. Looking forward to your reply. -- Warm Regards, Bharat Kumar Kobagana Software Engineer OpenStack Storage ? RedHat India Mobile - +91 9949278005 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: MultipleAccounts.png Type: image/png Size: 167095 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Error.png Type: image/png Size: 155642 bytes Desc: not available URL: From florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de Mon Dec 22 13:34:53 2014 From: florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de (Florian Schmidt) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:34:53 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Message-ID: <00e701d01dec$11b31220$35193660$@t-online.de> Hello all together, i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht ml You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml here[2] Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and then Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to find out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the log files. I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve this problem :) [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c Kind regards, Florian From lyz at princessleia.com Mon Dec 22 16:55:43 2014 From: lyz at princessleia.com (Elizabeth K. Joseph) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:55:43 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 23rd at 19:00 UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday December 23rd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend. Meeting log and minutes from the last meeting are available here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-16-19.01.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-16-19.01.txt Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-16-19.01.log.html -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 From fungi at yuggoth.org Mon Dec 22 19:29:18 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:29:18 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting to delete duplicate account In-Reply-To: <54965AA5.1070806@redhat.com> References: <54964F30.4090503@redhat.com> <54965AA5.1070806@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20141222192918.GM2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-21 10:59:09 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: > I have multiple accounts with the same email ID and name, [...] > 1. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) > 2. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) > 3. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) > 4. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) [...] > Please remove/deactivate all the accounts from Gerrit. I will > create from the scratch. I have marked account IDs 13131, 13527, 13882 and 14089 inactive in Gerrit. Please let us know if you run into further issues. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From zaro0508 at gmail.com Tue Dec 23 01:00:06 2014 From: zaro0508 at gmail.com (Zaro) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:00:06 -0800 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit and Storyboard integration Message-ID: Hello all, I just wanted to let everyone know that I've started a new Gerrit plugin project, its-storybard[1]. This plugin will allow us to integrate Gerrit with Storyboard in a similar way we have integrated Gerrit with Launchpad. The Gerrit project implemented a set of generic ITS('issue tracking system') integration points in ver 2.9 that allows plugins to easily extend to integrate Gerrit with any ITS application. You can find other its-* plugins in the Gerrit repo, such as its-bugzilla, its-jira, etc.. Some examples of what the its-storybard plugin will provide: - update comments on storyboard stories when an associated Gerrit change is updated - update a storyboard's task status on an associated Gerrit change status transition. - create a new storyboard task when a new change is created in Gerrit. I believe our current setup to integrate Gerrit with Launchpad is using jeepyb[2]. I think jeepyb was a good solution for the pre-Gerrit 2.9 days but going forward I think the its-storyboard plugin would be a better solution. You can find the initial its-storyboard patch[3] upstream. If you are interested please take a look. The initial patch is on Gerrit master (currently ver 2.11). The process to getting this into Openstack Gerrit is to upgrade our Gerrit to at least ver 2.9, back porting the plugin, then adding the installation to system-config. Have a very merry x-mas. -Khai [1] https://gerrit.googlesource.com/plugins/its-storyboard [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/jeepyb [3] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/60590 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abhishek at cloudbyte.com Tue Dec 23 06:35:12 2014 From: abhishek at cloudbyte.com (Abhishek Shrivastava) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:05:12 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: References: <00e701d01dec$11b31220$35193660$@t-online.de> Message-ID: Hi Florian, Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your *zuul* problem. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Amit Das wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > Can we send some kind of info/help to this email thread... e.g. becoming > more relevant in the community. > > I know I have been stressing a lot on these :) > These will help us to get an exception request approved in the coming > months for our check-in. > > Regards, > Amit > *CloudByte Inc.* > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Florian Schmidt > Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM > Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > > Hello all together, > > i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use > Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit > events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout > based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). > > I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: > > http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht > ml > > > You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml > here[2] > > Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added > In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page > lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job > "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem > somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that > someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log > and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and > then > Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to > trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to > find > out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the > log > files. > > I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel > free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve > this > problem :) > > [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 > [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 > [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c > > Kind regards, > Florian > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bharat.kobagana at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 09:29:53 2014 From: bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:59:53 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting to delete duplicate account In-Reply-To: <54991889.2070508@redhat.com> References: <54964F30.4090503@redhat.com> <54965AA5.1070806@redhat.com> <20141222192918.GM2497@yuggoth.org> <54991889.2070508@redhat.com> Message-ID: <54993611.9060107@redhat.com> Hi, All the issues got resolved. Thank you very much Stanley for your quick response. Is there any way to change the owner of patches from old account ("bkobagan at redhat.com") to new account("bharat.kobagana at redhat.com")? On 12/23/2014 12:53 PM, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Thank you very much Stanley. > > Now what can I do to have a single account with the Email ID > bkobagan at redhat.com? > > On 12/23/2014 12:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2014-12-21 10:59:09 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: >>> I have multiple accounts with the same email ID and name, >> [...] >>> 1. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) >>> 2. bharat.kobagana at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) >>> 3. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) >>> 4. bkobagan at redhat.com (Bharat Kumar Kobagana) >> [...] >>> Please remove/deactivate all the accounts from Gerrit. I will >>> create from the scratch. >> I have marked account IDs 13131, 13527, 13882 and 14089 inactive in >> Gerrit. Please let us know if you run into further issues. > -- Warm Regards, Bharat Kumar Kobagana Software Engineer OpenStack Storage ? RedHat India Mobile - +91 9949278005 From florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de Tue Dec 23 09:30:00 2014 From: florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de (=?utf-8?B?RmxvcmlhbiBTY2htaWR0?=) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:30:00 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] =?utf-8?q?=5BSupport=5D_Problems_installing_zuu?= =?utf-8?q?l_for_jenkins-gerrit_gateway_=28Jenkins_does_not_run_jobs=29?= Message-ID: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> Hello, thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause i'm in a train :/) In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the settings (works) and enabled gearman. [1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) Kind regards, Florian Gesendet mit meinem HTC ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" An: "Florian Schmidt" , Cc: "Amit Das" , "Punith S" Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 Hi Florian, Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your zuul problem.? On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Amit Das wrote: Hey Guys, Can we send some kind of info/help to this email thread... e.g. becoming more relevant in the community. I know I have been stressing a lot on these :) These will help us to get an exception request approved in the coming months for our check-in. Regards, AmitCloudByte Inc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Florian Schmidt Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Hello all together, i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht ml You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml here[2] Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and then Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to find out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the log files. I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve this problem :) [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c Kind regards, Florian _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dteselkin at mirantis.com Tue Dec 23 09:32:33 2014 From: dteselkin at mirantis.com (Dmitry Teselkin) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:32:33 +0400 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> Message-ID: Hi Florian, I had almost the same problem with zuul recently, here are some step that might help you to identify what's wrong: * You're created a job with name 'Jenkins-test' in your Jenkins, aren't you? * Check the status of gearman: on your zuul node telnet to 127.0.0.1 port 4730, and issue command 'status' to get status info about jobs registered in gearman. You can use the command below if you want to use grep: echo 'status' | nc 127.0.0.1 4730 -w 1 | grep 'something' Output from 'status' command should contain jobs from Jenkins node, 'Jenkins-test' in your case. * Check that jenkins can connect to the zuul's gearman: Open 'Manage Jenkins' -> 'Configure System' on your Jenkins, scroll down to the 'Gearman plugin' and press 'Test connection'. You can start 'tcpdump' on port 4730 on your zuul server prior to this, to check that there is trafic between the hosts. * Try to disable gearman plugin in jenkins, save configuration, then enable it back. Hope this helps. On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Florian Schmidt < florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it > on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you > need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause > i'm in a train :/) > > In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's > git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin > binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the > settings (works) and enabled gearman. > > [1] > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu > > If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) > > Kind regards, > Florian > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" , < > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Amit Das" , "Punith S" < > punith.s at cloudbyte.com> > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 > > Hi Florian, > > Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting > up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your *zuul* problem. > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Amit Das wrote: > >> >> Hey Guys, >> >> Can we send some kind of info/help to this email thread... e.g. becoming >> more relevant in the community. >> >> I know I have been stressing a lot on these :) >> These will help us to get an exception request approved in the coming >> months for our check-in. >> >> Regards, >> Amit >> *CloudByte Inc.* >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Florian Schmidt >> Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM >> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for >> jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) >> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> >> Hello all together, >> >> i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use >> Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific >> Gerrit >> events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout >> based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). >> >> I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: >> >> http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht >> ml >> >> >> You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml >> here[2] >> >> Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added >> In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page >> lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job >> "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem >> somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that >> someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log >> and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and >> then >> Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to >> trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to >> find >> out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the >> log >> files. >> >> I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel >> free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve >> this >> problem :) >> >> [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 >> [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 >> [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c >> >> Kind regards, >> Florian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Abhishek > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abhishek at cloudbyte.com Tue Dec 23 09:54:14 2014 From: abhishek at cloudbyte.com (Abhishek Shrivastava) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:24:14 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Fwd: [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Abhishek Shrivastava Date: Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:23 PM Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) To: Florian Schmidt Hi Florian, Thanks for this article, but since we haven't got any issues like yours in our setup, therefore I am sending you one *automated procedure document* for setting up the CI environment that we are following. I hope it can help. On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Schmidt < florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it > on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you > need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause > i'm in a train :/) > > In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's > git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin > binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the > settings (works) and enabled gearman. > > [1] > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu > > If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) > > Kind regards, > Florian > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" , < > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Amit Das" , "Punith S" < > punith.s at cloudbyte.com> > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 > > Hi Florian, > > Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting > up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your *zuul* problem. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Florian Schmidt >> Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM >> Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for >> jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) >> To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org >> >> >> Hello all together, >> >> i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use >> Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific >> Gerrit >> events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout >> based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). >> >> I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: >> >> http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht >> ml >> >> >> You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml >> here[2] >> >> Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added >> In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page >> lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job >> "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem >> somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that >> someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log >> and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and >> then >> Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to >> trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to >> find >> out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the >> log >> files. >> >> I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel >> free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve >> this >> problem :) >> >> [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 >> [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 >> [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c >> >> Kind regards, >> Florian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Abhishek > -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- ================================================================================ README FOR SETUP CINDER CI SYSTEM FOR HDS DRIVERS ================================================================================ ================================================================================ ABOUT ================================================================================ The propose of this README is to set up a real external testing plataform for OpenStack using VMWare to handle nodes snapshots. This README contains the step-by-step to install Jenkins, Jenkins Job Builder (JJB), the Gerrit Jenkins plugin and auxiliary scripts and the HDS/Hitachi jobs. The most part of scripts used in this configuration was forked from: - jaypipes (https://github.com/jaypipes/os-ext-testing) - rasselin (https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing) ================================================================================ PRE-REQUISITES ================================================================================ To set up the external OpenStack CI system you will need: 1. At least 2 Ubuntu 12.04 machines with at least 8GB each machine 2. A Gerrit account registered for your testing system 3. Install base dependency packages on your hosts/VMs 4. Set up your data repository 2. A Gerrit account registered for your testing system In order for your testing platform to post review comments to Gerrit code reviews on openstack.org, you will need to have a service account registered with the OpenStack Infra team. See this link (http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requesting-a-service-account) for instructions on getting this account. In short, you will need to email the OpenStack Infra mailing list (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra) an email that includes: - The email address to use for the system account (must be different from any other Gerrit account) - A short account username that will appear on code reviews - (optional) A longer account name or description - (optional but encouraged) Include your contact information (IRC handle, your email address, and maybe an alternate contact?s email address) to assist the upstream infrastructure team - The public key for an SSH key pair that the service account will use for Gerrit access.Please note that there should be no newlines in the SSH key Don?t have an SSH key pair for your Gerrit service account? You can create one like so: $ ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 1024 -N '' -f gerrit_key The above will produce the key pair: a pair of files called gerrit_key and gerrit_key.pub. Copy the text of the gerrit_key.pub into the email you send to the OpenStack Infra mailing list. Keep both the files handy for use in the next step. 3. Install base dependency packages on your hosts/VMs $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install git wget openssl ssl-cert ca-certificates 4. Set up your data repository You will want to create a Git repository containing configuration data files -- such as the Gerrit username and private SSH key file for your testing account -- that are used in setting up the test platform. The easiest way to get your data repository set up is to make a copy of the example repository I set up here: http://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing-data Instead of forking the repository, like you might would normally do, I recommend instead just git clone?ing the repository to some local directory, and making it your own data repository: $ git clone https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing-data.git \ ~/os-ext-testing-data $ cd os-ext-testing-data $ rm -rf .git $ git init . $ git add . $ git commit -a -m "My new data repository" There are a few things you will need to do in this data repository: I. Copy the private SSH key that you submitted when you registered with the upstream OpenStack Infrastructure team into somewhere in this repo. II. If you do not want to use the SSH key pair in the os-ext-testing-data example data repository and want to create your own SSH key pair, do this step. Create an SSH key pair that you will use for Jenkins. This SSH key pair will live in the /var/lib/jenkins/.ssh/ directory on the master Jenkins host, and it will be added to the /home/jenkins/.ssh/authorized_keys file of all slave hosts: $ ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 1024 -N '' -f jenkins_key Once you do the above, copy the jenkins_key and jenkins_key.pub files into your data repository. III. Open up vars.sh in an editor: a) Change the value of $GIT_EMAIL to the email you registered with the upstream OpenStack Infrastructure team b) Change the value of the $GIT_NAME shell variable to the Gerrit username you registered with the upstream OpenStack Infrastructure team as detailed in these instructions c) Change the value of the $UPSTREAM_GERRIT_USER shell variable to the Gerrit username you registered with the upstream OpenStack Infrastructure team as detailed in these instructions d) Change the value of the $UPSTREAM_GERRIT_SSH_KEY_PATH shell variable to the relative path of the private SSH key file you copied into the repository in step #1. For example, let's say you put your private SSH key file named mygerritkey into a directory called ssh within the repository, you would set the $UPSTREAM_GERRIT_SSH_KEY_PATH value to ssh/mygerritkey e) If for some reason, in step #2 above, you either used a different output filename than jenkins_key or put the key pair into some subdirectory of your data repository, then change the value of the $JENKINS_SSH_KEY_PATH variable in vars.sh to an appropriate value. f) Paste the jenkins public key with no whitespaces (only the key) to the $JENKINS_SSH_PUBLIC_KEY_NO_WHITESPACE g) Rename nodepool config file sample to script used by master: $ mv os-ext-testing-data/etc/nodepool/nodepool.yaml.erb.sample \ os-ext-testing-data/etc/nodepool/nodepool.yaml.erb IV. Next, open up the file etc/jenkins_jobs/config/projects.yaml in your data repository. Change the following line in it: vendor: MyVendor Change MyVendor to your organization?s name. V. Save changes in your data repository: $ git add . $ git commit -a -m "Added Gerrit SSH key and username" $ git push ================================================================================ Install Jenkins Master ================================================================================ On the host or virtual machine (or LXC container) you wish to run the Jenkins Master node on, run the following (the git account need to be set before run script - public key): $ git clone $YOUR_DATA_REPO $ wget https://raw.github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/master/puppet/install_master.sh $ bash install_master.sh The script will install Puppet, create an SSH key for the Jenkins master, create self-signed certificates for Apache, and then will ask you for the URL of the Git repository you are using as your data repository (see Prerequisites #4 above). Enter the URL of your data repository and hit Enter. Puppet will proceed to set up the Jenkins master. When Puppet completes, go ahead and open up the Jenkins web UI, which by default will be at http://$HOST_IP:8080. You will need to enable the Gearman workers that Zuul and Jenkins use to interact. To do this: 1. Restart jenkins: $ sudo service jenkins restart 2. Click the `Manage Jenkins` link on the left 3. Click the `Configure System` link 4. Scroll down until you see ?Gearman Plugin Config?. Check the ?Enable Gearman? checkbox. 5. Click the ?Test Connection? button and verify Jenkins connects to Gearman. 6. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click `Save` 7. Once you are done with that, it?s time to load up your Jenkins jobs and restart Zuul: $ sudo jenkins-jobs --flush-cache update /etc/jenkins_jobs/config/ $ sudo service zuul restart If you want to test the communication between Upstream and your master, you can do: $ sudo tail -f /var/log/zuul/debug.log | grep sandbox OK, now create a simple test patch in sandbox. Do this on your development workstation, not your Jenkins master (to do it, you will need to set your gerrit credentials): $ git clone git at github.com:openstack-dev/sandbox /tmp/sandbox $ cd /tmp/sandbox $ git checkout -b testing-ext $ touch mytest $ git add mytest $ git commit -a -m "Testing comms" $ git review After do it, You will see in the debug.log a gerrit request to run the job pre-configured. ================================================================================ Install Jenkins Master Plugins ================================================================================ Now, you need to update the plugins installed and install anothers: 1. Click the `Manage Jenkins` link on the left 2. Click the `Manage Plugins` link 3. Update all plugins, except the LDAP Plugin 4. Go to available tab 5. Install the following plugins: Conditional-buildstep and Jenkins Parameterized Trigger plugin 6. Manual setup of Jenkins scp 1.9 plugin as follow: Version 1.8 is publicly available, but does not have all features (e.g. copy console log file, copy files after failure, etc.). Follow these steps to manually build and install the scp 1.9 plugin. Solve some dependencies is needed to build using "mvn": $ git clone https://github.com/jenkinsci/scp-plugin $ cd scp-plugin; mvn package When the plugin compilation was finished, go to Jenkins UI and upload the plugin: Jenkins Manage Plugins -> Advanced -> Upload Plugin (target/scp.hpi from the maven build) Source: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2013-December/000568.html 7. After install SCP Plugin, you need to configure it: a) Click the `Manage Jenkins` link on the left b) Click the `Configure System` link c) Scroll down until you see ?SCP repository hosts?. d) Fill out all fields on the section (the Keyfile option is optional). ================================================================================ Install VMWare tools ================================================================================ On node that Jenkins Master was installed: # http://trickycloud.wordpress.com/2013/11/01/using-the-vsphere-sdkapi-in-ubuntu/ configuring vmware client: 1 - Install prereqs: $ sudo apt-get -y update && sudo apt-get install ia32-libs build-essential \ gcc uuid uuid-dev perl libssl-dev perl-doc liburi-perl libxml-libxml-perl \ libcrypt-ssleay-perl 2 - Update the deprecated modules using cpan. Hit for all questions: $ sudo cpan install LWP::UserAgent $ sudo cpan install Compress::Zlib $ sudo cpan install Compress::Raw::Zlib $ sudo cpan install IO::Compress::Base $ sudo cpan install IO::Compress::Zlib::Constants 3 - Checking versions: $ perl -MLWP -e 'print "$LWP::VERSION\n"' $ perl -MNet::HTTP -e 'print "$Net::HTTP::VERSION\n"' 4 - Download and install the versions 6.03 of Net-HTTP and LWP: $ wget http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/libwww-perl-6.03.tar.gz $ wget http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/G/GA/GAAS/Net-HTTP-6.03.tar.gz PS: Unpack the files and follow the instructions of README 5 - Verify the new installed versions: $ perl -MLWP -e 'print "$LWP::VERSION\n"' $ perl -MNet::HTTP -e 'print "$Net::HTTP::VERSION\n"' 6 - Download and install vmware SDK client version 5.5 (https://my.vmware.com/group/vmware/details?downloadGroup=SDKPERL550&productId=353#) To do it, You need to register yourself in VMWare website. 7 - Test with the following command: $ vmware-cmd --server 172.24.44.14 --username 'USER' --password 'PASSWORD' \ --vihost "[] /.vmx" hassnapshot ================================================================================ Install Jenkins Slave ================================================================================ On each host or virtual machine (or LXC container) you wish to run the Jenkins Slave node on, run the following (the git account need to be set before run script - public key): $ git clone $YOUR_DATA_REPO $ wget https://raw.github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/master/puppet/install_slave.sh $ bash install_slave.sh The script will install Puppet, install a Jenkins slave, and install the Jenkins master's public SSH key in the authorized_keys of the Jenkins slave. Once the script completes successfully, you need to add the slave node to Jenkins master. To do so manually, follow these steps: 1. Go to the Jenkins web UI. By default, this will be http://$IP_OF_MASTER:8080 2. Click the Credentials link on the left 3. Click the Global credentials link 4. Click the Add credentials link on the left 5. Select SSH username with private key from the dropdown labeled "Kind" 6. Enter "jenkins" in the Username textbox 7. Select the "From a file on Jenkins master" radio button and enter /var/lib/jenkins/.ssh/id_rsa in the File textbox 8. Click the OK button 9. Click the "Jenkins" link in the upper left to go back to home page 10. Click the Manage Jenkins link on the left 11. Click the Manage Nodes link 12. Click the "New Node" link on the left 13. Enter devstack_slave1 in the Node name textbox 14. Select the Dumb Slave radio button 15. Click the OK button 16. Enter 2 in the Executors textbox 17. Enter /home/jenkins/workspaces in the Remote FS root textbox 18. Enter devstack_slave in the Labels textbox 19. Enter the IP Address of your slave host or VM in the Host textbox 20. Select jenkins from the Credentials dropdown 21. Click the Save button 22. Click the Log link on the left. The log should show the master connecting to the slave, and at the end of the log should be: "Slave successfully connected and online" ================================================================================ Configure Jobs on Master ================================================================================ On the Jenkins Master Node, you need to configure the desired jobs. To work with VMWare, we need to configure a especific type of job. In this toturial we will configure part of the jobs configuration via command line and another configs will be set via GUI. 1. Open the /etc/jenkins_jobs/config/projects.yaml and edit: - project: name: github-org: node: vendor: jobs: - - : node: 2. Open the /etc/jenkins_jobs/config/examples.yaml and edit: - job-template: name: node: - job-template: name: node: '{node}' wrappers: - timeout: timeout: 120 # Timeout in *minutes* fail: true # A job run that exceeds the timeout will cause a failure - timestamps builders: - devstack-checkout - shell: | - link-logs # In macros.yaml from os-ext-testing publishers: - devstack-logs # In macros.yaml from os-ext-testing - console-log # In macros.yaml from os-ext-testing PS: An auxialiry-job template can be found in ~/os-ext-testing-data/etc/jenkins_jobs/config/dsvm-cinder-driver.yaml.sample 3. Open the /etc/jenkins_jobs/config/macros.yaml and edit: - builder: name: link-logs builders: - shell: | #!/bin/sh echo "Detailed logs: http:///$LOG_PATH/" - publisher: name: console-log publishers: - scp: site: '' files: - target: '$LOG_PATH' copy-console: true copy-after-failure: true - publisher: name: devstack-logs publishers: - scp: site: '' files: - target: '$LOG_PATH' source: 'logs/**' keep-hierarchy: true copy-after-failure: true 4. Open the /etc/zuul/zuul.conf and edit: url_pattern=http:///{build.parameters[LOG_PATH]} status_url=http:///zuul/status 5. Update the changes: $ sudo jenkins-jobs update /etc/jenkins_jobs/config 6. On GUI: a) Go to the Jenkins web UI. By default, this will be http://$IP_OF_MASTER:8080 b) Click on c) Click the Configure link d) Configure "Dicard Olb Builds" as desired e) Uncheck "Execute concurrent buils if necessary" f) Set Time-out strategy to "Absolute" g) Set Timeout minutes to "180" h) Click the Add build step button i) Click the Conditional steps (multiple) option j) Set Run? to "Always" k) Click the Add step to condition button l) Click the Execute Shell option m) Add to the textbox: #!/bin/bash vmware-cmd --server --username 'USERNAME' --password 'PASSWORD' --vihost "[] /.vmx" revertsnapshot vmware-cmd --server --username 'USERNAME' --password 'PASSWORD' --vihost "[] /.vmx" start hard n) Click the Add step to condition button o) Click the Execute Shell option p) Add to the textbox: #!/bin/bash sleep 200 ssh jenkins@ "exec java -jar /home/jenkins/workspaces/slave.jar &" sleep 160 q) Click the Add step to condition button r) Click the Trigger/call builds on other projects option s) Set to 'Projects to build' t) Check the Block until the triggered projects... option u) Click the Add Parameters button v) Click the Predefined parameters option w) Add to the textbox: LOG_PATH=$LOG_PATH x) Save configuration ================================================================================ Configure Slave Node ================================================================================ 1. Configure NTP Open /etc/ntp.conf Edit the server section Add the Jenkins Master as first NTP server server iburst restart ntp server sudo service ntp restart 2. Install driver deps, example: nfs-common, open-iscsi-utils, tool binaries,... 3. Add all config file needed, except the cinder.conf and tempest files 4. Change the MySQL password of root user to "secretmysql". That is the default password set on scripts. 5. Take a snapshot that will be used for CI to revert the state of the VM ============================================================================= Configure Log Server ============================================================================= 1. Setup a Machine with public IP, Ubuntu OS, apache and ssh installed 2. Create a user for Jenkins to allow it to copy the log files to the server From fungi at yuggoth.org Tue Dec 23 12:00:52 2014 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:00:52 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] Requesting to delete duplicate account In-Reply-To: <54993611.9060107@redhat.com> References: <54964F30.4090503@redhat.com> <54965AA5.1070806@redhat.com> <20141222192918.GM2497@yuggoth.org> <54991889.2070508@redhat.com> <54993611.9060107@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20141223120052.GO2497@yuggoth.org> On 2014-12-23 14:59:53 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: [...] > Is there any way to change the owner of patches from old account > ("bkobagan at redhat.com") to new account("bharat.kobagana at redhat.com")? There is not, but that really only matters for the "abandon"/"restore" buttons. If you need a review abandoned or restored which was owned by one of your other four duplicate accounts, reach out to a core reviewer on the project in question and they should be able to do that for you. -- Jeremy Stanley From krotscheck at gmail.com Tue Dec 23 22:34:48 2014 From: krotscheck at gmail.com (Michael Krotscheck) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:34:48 +0000 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] [storyboard] Nominating Yolanda Robla for StoryBoard Core Message-ID: Hello everyone! StoryBoard is the much anticipated successor to Launchpad, and is a component of the Infrastructure Program. The storyboard-core group is intended to be a superset of the infra-core group, with additional reviewers who specialize in the field. Yolanda has been working on StoryBoard ever since the Atlanta Summit, and has provided a diligent and cautious voice to our development effort. She has consistently provided feedback on our reviews, and is neither afraid of asking for clarification, nor of providing constructive criticism. In return, she has been nothing but gracious and responsive when improvements were suggested to her own submissions. Furthermore, Yolanda has been quite active in the infrastructure team as a whole, and provides valuable context for us in the greater realm of infra. Please respond within this thread with either supporting commentary, or concerns about her promotion. Since many western countries are currently celebrating holidays, the review period will remain open until January 9th. If the consensus is positive, we will promote her then! Thanks, Michael References: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22yolanda.robla+%253Cinfo%2540ysoft.biz%253E%22,n,z http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=yolanda.robla&metric=marks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abhishek at cloudbyte.com Wed Dec 24 05:09:20 2014 From: abhishek at cloudbyte.com (Abhishek Shrivastava) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:39:20 +0530 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: <012201d01ef6$db7c02f0$927408d0$@t-online.de> References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> <012201d01ef6$db7c02f0$927408d0$@t-online.de> Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for the information, I'll follow as you did and will come back to you as soon as I find the solution. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Florian Schmidt < florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > > thanks again! I?m not sure, if the document/script helps me, because i > don?t want to install an external testing for openstack. Maybe this was not > ?clear?, but I want to use zuul as the bridge between my own gerrit and my > own Jenkins installation (without openstack or any other upstream projects). > > > > Nevertheless, I think I checked the settings, which are set by puppet (as > good as I can without much puppet knowledge) and can?t find any difference > :/ > > > > Kind regards and merry Christmas! > > Florian > > > > *Von:* Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com] > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014 10:53 > *An:* Florian Schmidt > *Betreff:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > > > > Hi Florian, > > > > Thanks for this article, but since we haven't got any issues like yours in > our setup, therefore I am sending you one *automated procedure document* > for setting up the CI environment that we are following. I hope it can > help. > > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Schmidt < > florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it > on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you > need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause > i'm in a train :/) > > > > In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's > git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin > binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the > settings (works) and enabled gearman. > > > > [1] > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu > > > > If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) > > > > Kind regards, > > Florian > > > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" , < > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Amit Das" , "Punith S" < > punith.s at cloudbyte.com> > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 > > > > Hi Florian, > > > > Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting > up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your *zuul* problem. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Florian Schmidt* > Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM > Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > > Hello all together, > > i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use > Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit > events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout > based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). > > I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: > > http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht > ml > > You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml > here[2] > > Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added > In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page > lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job > "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem > somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that > someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log > and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and > then > Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to > trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to > find > out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the > log > files. > > I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel > free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve > this > problem :) > > [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 > [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 > [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c > > Kind regards, > Florian > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Abhishek > -- Regards & Merry Christmas, Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de Wed Dec 24 11:07:41 2014 From: florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de (Florian Schmidt) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:07:41 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> <012201d01ef6$db7c02f0$927408d0$@t-online.de> Message-ID: <014601d01f69$d5f8e4b0$81eaae10$@t-online.de> Hi, big thanks for your help! If you (or any other) need more information about something, please just ask :) Kind regards, Florian Von: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014 06:09 An: Florian Schmidt; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Betreff: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Hi, Thanks for the information, I'll follow as you did and will come back to you as soon as I find the solution. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Florian Schmidt > wrote: Hi, thanks again! I?m not sure, if the document/script helps me, because i don?t want to install an external testing for openstack. Maybe this was not ?clear?, but I want to use zuul as the bridge between my own gerrit and my own Jenkins installation (without openstack or any other upstream projects). Nevertheless, I think I checked the settings, which are set by puppet (as good as I can without much puppet knowledge) and can?t find any difference :/ Kind regards and merry Christmas! Florian Von: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com ] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014 10:53 An: Florian Schmidt Betreff: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Hi Florian, Thanks for this article, but since we haven't got any issues like yours in our setup, therefore I am sending you one automated procedure document for setting up the CI environment that we are following. I hope it can help. On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Schmidt > wrote: Hello, thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause i'm in a train :/) In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the settings (works) and enabled gearman. [1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) Kind regards, Florian Gesendet mit meinem HTC ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" >, > Cc: "Amit Das" >, "Punith S" > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 Hi Florian, Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your zuul problem. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Florian Schmidt > Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Hello all together, i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht ml You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml here[2] Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and then Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to find out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com " in the log files. I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve this problem :) [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c Kind regards, Florian _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -- Regards & Merry Christmas, Abhishek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dteselkin at mirantis.com Wed Dec 24 11:14:31 2014 From: dteselkin at mirantis.com (Dmitry Teselkin) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:14:31 +0400 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: <014601d01f69$d5f8e4b0$81eaae10$@t-online.de> References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> <012201d01ef6$db7c02f0$927408d0$@t-online.de> <014601d01f69$d5f8e4b0$81eaae10$@t-online.de> Message-ID: Hi, Could you run command 'workers' instead of 'status' against zuul and check if your jenkins job is there? This morning I had similar issue with 'queued' jobs in zuul, and I found that although the jobs were in output from 'status' command, they weren't be in 'workers'. And it looks like I was wrong about permissions for 'jenkins-ci' user. This user is for communications with gerrit, AFAIK. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Florian Schmidt < florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > > big thanks for your help! If you (or any other) need more information > about something, please just ask :) > > > > Kind regards, > > Florian > > > > *Von:* Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com] > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014 06:09 > *An:* Florian Schmidt; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > *Betreff:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the information, I'll follow as you did and will come back to > you as soon as I find the solution. > > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Florian Schmidt < > florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thanks again! I?m not sure, if the document/script helps me, because i > don?t want to install an external testing for openstack. Maybe this was not > ?clear?, but I want to use zuul as the bridge between my own gerrit and my > own Jenkins installation (without openstack or any other upstream projects). > > > > Nevertheless, I think I checked the settings, which are set by puppet (as > good as I can without much puppet knowledge) and can?t find any difference > :/ > > > > Kind regards and merry Christmas! > > Florian > > > > *Von:* Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com] > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014 10:53 > *An:* Florian Schmidt > *Betreff:* Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > > > > Hi Florian, > > > > Thanks for this article, but since we haven't got any issues like yours in > our setup, therefore I am sending you one *automated procedure document* > for setting up the CI environment that we are following. I hope it can > help. > > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Schmidt < > florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it > on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you > need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause > i'm in a train :/) > > > > In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's > git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin > binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the > settings (works) and enabled gearman. > > > > [1] > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu > > > > If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) > > > > Kind regards, > > Florian > > > > Gesendet mit meinem HTC > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" , < > openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Amit Das" , "Punith S" < > punith.s at cloudbyte.com> > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 > > > > Hi Florian, > > > > Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting > up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your *zuul* problem. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Florian Schmidt* > Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM > Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for > jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) > To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org > > > Hello all together, > > i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use > Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit > events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout > based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). > > I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: > > http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht > ml > > You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml > here[2] > > Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added > In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page > lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job > "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem > somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that > someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log > and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and > then > Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to > trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to > find > out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com" in the > log > files. > > I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel > free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve > this > problem :) > > [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 > [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 > [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c > > Kind regards, > Florian > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > > > -- > > Regards & Merry Christmas, > > Abhishek > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de Wed Dec 24 11:23:33 2014 From: florian.schmidt.welzow at t-online.de (Florian Schmidt) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:23:33 +0100 Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) In-Reply-To: References: <1Y3Ln3-0AB5F20@fwd26.t-online.de> <012201d01ef6$db7c02f0$927408d0$@t-online.de> <014601d01f69$d5f8e4b0$81eaae10$@t-online.de> Message-ID: <016901d01f6c$0d9c4ae0$28d4e0a0$@t-online.de> Hi, about the ?Not permitted? errors see my last E-Mail :) workers give me 2 (Jenkins-related) workers, ?nodeName_exec-1? and ?nodeName_exec-2? (I configured my Jenkins master to be able to build two jobs at one time). Both workers have all Jenkins jobs (including Jenkins-test) with a ?build:? prefix (full name for Jenkins-test: ?build:Jenkins-test?). And status has all jobs prefixed with build:, too. Von: Dmitry Teselkin [mailto:dteselkin at mirantis.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014 12:15 An: Florian Schmidt Cc: Abhishek Shrivastava; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Betreff: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Hi, Could you run command 'workers' instead of 'status' against zuul and check if your jenkins job is there? This morning I had similar issue with 'queued' jobs in zuul, and I found that although the jobs were in output from 'status' command, they weren't be in 'workers'. And it looks like I was wrong about permissions for 'jenkins-ci' user. This user is for communications with gerrit, AFAIK. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Florian Schmidt > wrote: Hi, big thanks for your help! If you (or any other) need more information about something, please just ask :) Kind regards, Florian Von: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com ] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014 06:09 An: Florian Schmidt; openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Betreff: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Hi, Thanks for the information, I'll follow as you did and will come back to you as soon as I find the solution. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Florian Schmidt > wrote: Hi, thanks again! I?m not sure, if the document/script helps me, because i don?t want to install an external testing for openstack. Maybe this was not ?clear?, but I want to use zuul as the bridge between my own gerrit and my own Jenkins installation (without openstack or any other upstream projects). Nevertheless, I think I checked the settings, which are set by puppet (as good as I can without much puppet knowledge) and can?t find any difference :/ Kind regards and merry Christmas! Florian Von: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhishek at cloudbyte.com ] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014 10:53 An: Florian Schmidt Betreff: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Hi Florian, Thanks for this article, but since we haven't got any issues like yours in our setup, therefore I am sending you one automated procedure document for setting up the CI environment that we are following. I hope it can help. On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Schmidt > wrote: Hello, thanks for your answer. For Jenkins i used this wiki article to install it on Ubuntu server [1] and added Jobs via the Jenkins web frontend (if you need the parameter for the test job, i can attach it, but not now, cause i'm in a train :/) In order to install zuul i downloaded the gearman plugin from openstack's git and build it with marven (clean install), uploaded the resulting plugin binary to jenkins (again via the web frontned), test the connection in the settings (works) and enabled gearman. [1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Installing+Jenkins+on+Ubuntu If you have further questions, i'm happy to answer :) Kind regards, Florian Gesendet mit meinem HTC ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Abhishek Shrivastava" > An: "Florian Schmidt" >, > Cc: "Amit Das" >, "Punith S" > Betreff: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) Datum: Di., Dez. 23, 2014 07:35 Hi Florian, Can you please tell me the procedure which you have followed for setting up the CI environment, so that I can be clear with your zuul problem. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Florian Schmidt Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM Subject: [OpenStack-Infra] [Support] Problems installing zuul for jenkins-gerrit gateway (Jenkins does not run jobs) To: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org Hello all together, i hope, someone of you can help me with my little problem. Actually I use Gerrit Trigger 8Jenkins plugin) to trigger Jenkins jobs for specific Gerrit events. Now I want to migrate from Gerrit Trigger to zuul (easier, layout based configuration and more trigger options and different pipelines). I installed zuul with this Blog post as a basis: http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.ht ml You can find my zuul configuration here[1] and my initial layout.yaml here[2] Now I have the problem, that it seems, that Jenkins doesn't run jobs added In gearman (they don't appear in Jenkins web frontend). Zuul's status page lists the change (added via a "recheck" comment) and the status of the job "Jenkins-test" is "queued" forever. That's why I think there is a problem somewhere between Jenkins and zuul, but I can't find it. I hope, that someone from here can assist me to find out the problem? I cleared the log and restarted Jenkins and zuul (stopped both and started zuul first and then Jenkins) and added a new comment "recheck" to my test change in gerrit to trigger a new build. I uploaded my log files here[3], maybe it helps to find out the problem. I have anonymized the domain to be "example.com " in the log files. I'm also online in #openstack-infra on freenode (nick: FlorianSW), so feel free to contact me there, I would be very grateful to get help to solve this problem :) [1] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/ed0e3047f0ef0c5e5554 [2] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/a101a87d653d5bbc6de6 [3] https://gist.github.com/Florianschmidtwelzow/12fff7c4530805dece0c Kind regards, Florian _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -- Thanks & Regards, Abhishek -- Regards & Merry Christmas, Abhishek _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: