Open Stack

On 09/25/2013 07:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 05:44 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2013 04:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>>> To be clear, I think it's a TERRIBLE idea to move half-way while we
>>>> still require launchpad ids for bugs.
>>>
>>> Let's hurry up with Storyboard then: the Foundation is setting the
>>> budget for 2014, although I wonder if we can outsource that
>>> development... ideas?
>>
>> I don't think we should "outsource" it, since managing that outsourcing
>> so that it produces the desired results would be a waste of time for the
>> key people involved (compared to openly developing it).
>>
>> I would rather use the money (if any) to fund some positions that would
>> free some time from the people that already work on it.
> 
> +1
> 
> Storyboard, to be successful, means evolving in the spirit of the rest
> of the infrastructure we've built in OpenStack. Building a community
> around it along the way. "Outsource" is the wrong model.

I agree. I'm currently pitching HP to add some dev resources for
Storyboard. Hopefully that will go well.