Another question. What is the main motivation behind this proposal? If all contents fit into "contributor", "contributor" directory just will add another extra path. 2018年10月28日(日) 19:27 Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>: > Basically +1. > I would like to raise a question whether it makes sense to move all > contents to contributor/. > Some contents are for the infra and/or i18n admin. They might fit into > admin/. > The i18n repo is different from other repositories, so the categories of > contributor, admin, and user might be different. > At least I believe our current contents should be categorized. > > Thought? > > 2018年10月28日(日) 2:06 Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com>: > >> Hello team, >> >> I18n contributor guide ( https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/ ) is >> based on rst files in >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/doc/source folder, but >> the folder structure is different from >> other project documents after project document migration [1]. >> >> How about moving rst files except index.rst into "contributor" folder >> like [2] >> to follow project document structure? >> >> >> With many thanks, >> >> /Ian >> >> [1] >> >> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html#proposed-change >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tree/doc/source/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-I18n mailing list >> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20181028/357ed215/attachment.html>