Basically +1. I would like to raise a question whether it makes sense to move all contents to contributor/. Some contents are for the infra and/or i18n admin. They might fit into admin/. The i18n repo is different from other repositories, so the categories of contributor, admin, and user might be different. At least I believe our current contents should be categorized. Thought? 2018年10月28日(日) 2:06 Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi at gmail.com>: > Hello team, > > I18n contributor guide ( https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/ ) is > based on rst files in > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/doc/source folder, but > the folder structure is different from > other project documents after project document migration [1]. > > How about moving rst files except index.rst into "contributor" folder > like [2] > to follow project document structure? > > > With many thanks, > > /Ian > > [1] > > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html#proposed-change > [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tree/doc/source/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-I18n mailing list > OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20181028/ee326ea8/attachment-0001.html>