Open Stack

Hello Pravin,

Wow - I have seen such strategy for the 1st time and also thought 
something similar with Robert.
But now I quite agree that it will prevent from unintentional spams.


Hello Alex,

I have shared the survey to openstack-dev and openstack-docs mailing 
lists :)
- http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115736.html
- http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2017-April/009939.html


Of course, I will answer the survey soon :)


With many thanks,

/Ian

pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote on 4/20/2017 7:51 PM:
>
>
> On 20 April 2017 at 16:15, Robert Simai <robert.simai at suse.com 
> <mailto:robert.simai at suse.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
>
>     > Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
>     >
>     > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz
>     <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz>
>     > T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
>
>     Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was
>     intentional. The rating
>     from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one
>     question
>     and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...
>
>
> That is general strategy of designing survey. Since many time users 
> spam survey by just giving 7 to all.
>
> This way, it is insured that user has read and then completed survey :)
>
> -
> Pravin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20170420/974bd0bc/attachment.html>