[Openstack-i18n] Criteria of Horizon language list for Mitakarelease
Ying Chun Guo
guoyingc at cn.ibm.com
Tue Mar 22 09:00:53 UTC 2016
Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote on 03/22/2016 02:27:21 AM:
> From: Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com>
> To: "openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org"
<Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 03/22/2016 02:29 AM
> Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Criteria of Horizon language list for Mitaka
> Hi i18n team,
> As Horizon liaison, I would like to ask you all about the criteria of
> Horizon language list for Mitaka release.
> The same topic was discussed several releases ago and the consensus at
> that time were:
> * remove all translations with less than 90% progress
> * update the language list accordingly.
> Translations were imported manually at that time and the situation may
> be changed now.
> I don't have an opinion and will just follow the i18n project decision.
> If no response or well-defined criteria, I will just keep the current
> language list .
Thank you for taking care of that, Akihiro.
I don't see any requests to change the language list.
> The following is just information:
> We have four PO files (django/djangojs for horizon and
> The current translation import policy for each PO file is documentedhere
> Each PO file is imported once the translation percentage becomes over
> and it will be removed when the translation percentage becomes less than
> What is our criteria?
My opinion is to follow the previous guidelines.
> In future releases, I think we should automate this as a part of
> translation import jobs.
> I will reduce the work of horizon liaison.
>  https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/
>  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Translations/
> Openstack-i18n mailing list
> Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
More information about the Openstack-i18n