Open Stack

Hi,

I understand the current situation, but it is better to announce
the official policy to be acknowledged as ATC.
We have the criteria (# of translated words) but it is not clear when
is the deadline.
As one translator, I always feel the deadline is suddenly cut without
no announcement.
IMHO it must be improved.

Akihiro

2016-08-12 9:00 GMT+09:00 Kato, Tomoyuki <kato.tomoyuki at jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Hi Akihiro,
>
> Unfortunately, automation activity is on-going.
> Therefore, our ATC process in Newton is the same way as Mitaka.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351480/
>
> Thanks,
> KATO Tomoyuki
>
>> Forwarded to i18n list.
>>
>> My big question is what is our ATC process in Newton.
>> I think everyone has the same question.
>> IIRC, an effort to track translator activity automatically is on-going,
>> but I don't know the current status.
>> I believe it should be announced officially.
>>
>> Akihiro
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
>> Date: 2016-08-11 1:24 GMT+09:00
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] extra ATCs for newton
>> To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>
>>
>> It's time to make sure we have all of our active technical contributors
>> (ATCs) identified for Newton.
>>
>> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
>> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
>> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
>> process because they have not submitted a patch.  Contributions
>> might include, but aren't limited to, bug triage, design work, and
>> documentation -- there is a lot of leeway in how teams define
>> contribution for ATC status.
>>
>> The resulting list of names should be submitted as a patch to the
>> "extra-atcs" section in openstack/governance/reference/projects.yaml
>> for review by the TC.
>>
>> Although extra ATCs can be nominated at any point, there is a
>> deadline to be included in the electorate for the next release
>> cycle. The ATC list needs to be approved by the TC by 25 Aug, and
>> in order to appear on the TC agenda to be discussed, the proposals
>> need to be submitted by 16 Aug.
>>
>> PTLs can delegate preparing the patch to the governance repository, but
>> please +1 the patch indicating that you agree with the list to avoid
>> delays in the TC review.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Doug
>>
>> [1] http://www.openstack.org/legal/technical-committee-member-policy/
>> [2] http://governance.openstack.org/reference/charter.html#voters-for-tc-seats-atc
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
>> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
> OpenStack-I18n at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n