Open Stack

I have no comment on Liberty translation priority atm.

I think a couple of different topics are discussed at the same here.

* CLI translation priority
* Server side project translation priority
* (potential) usage of server side project translations in Horizon

We need to have more contact with project teams in the next cycle
more deeply to decide translation priorties before starting translations.
In the past releases, i18n team tended to start discussions after starting
translations and it is too late for the game in most cases.

Regarding client projects, I know openstackclient is our future and
the keystone team encourage to use openstackclient for Keystone v3 API.
However, regarding other projects like nova or neutron,
the progress of openstackclient integration is not well enojgh
and a new feature is implemented in each client.
Thus we need to consider the priority in the next cycle.

For other topics, I will comment on them later if necessary.

Akihiro

2015-09-18 22:33 GMT+09:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc at cn.ibm.com>:

> very important information.
> I don't think translators would like to translate already
> deprecated or in the future deprecated clients.
> I might not be able to include openstack client in the Liberty translation
> plan.
> But I would put it high priority after Liberty translation.
> And next release, I will add openstack client to in the translation plan.
>
> Best regards
> Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
>
>
> Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote on 09/18/2015 04:51:32 PM:
>
> > From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>
> > To: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM at IBMCN
> > Cc: "openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: 09/18/2015 04:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients
> >
> > On 09/18/2015 10:35 AM, Ying Chun Guo wrote:
> > > Andreas,
> > >
> > > Forgive me if I ask funny question.
> >
> > There are no funny questions, please ask!
> >
> > > I see there is python-openstackclient in Zanata server.
> > > What is it for ?
> >
> > python-openstackclient is the "unnifed OpenStack client" that will
> > replace the per-project clients like python-keystoneclient (command
> > keystone).
> >
> > See http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-openstackclient/
> >
> > > What is the relationship between python-openstackclient and other
> python
> > > clients ( e.g python-keystoneclient,
> > > python-heatclient, and python-novaclient) ?
> >
> > The goal of python-openstackclient is to replace these. keystoneclient
> > is already deprecated in favor of openstackclient.
> >
> > So, priority wise: openstackclient has higher priority than the others.
> > The question for me is whether we want to translate these already
> > deprecated or in the future deprecated clients at all.
> >
> > Btw. I also think that the python-openstackclient has a higher priority
> > than nova - but lower than horizon. Both horizon and the client address
> > the end user while nova addresses the adminstrator,
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > > Best regards
> > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
> > >
> > >
> > > Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote on 09/18/2015 01:45:37 AM:
> > >
> > >  > From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>
> > >  > To: "openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org"
> > > <openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> > >  > Date: 09/18/2015 01:47 AM
> > >  > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients
> > >  >
> > >  > We now have setup python-keystoneclient for translation and there're
> > >  > requests for python-heatclient and python-novaclient
> > >  > (https://review.openstack.org/224832heat and
> > >  > https://review.openstack.org/224222nova)
> > >  >
> > >  > Does it really make sense to translate these? Especially with the
> > >  > openstack client getting translated already?
> > >  >
> > >  > My proposal would be to concentrate on the openstack client and
> tell the
> > >  > teams to not mark the clients for translation.
> > >  >
> > >  > What do you think?
> > >  >
> > >  > Please see also
> > >  >
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/
>
> > 073698.html
> > >  >
> > >  > Andreas
> > >  > --
> > >  >   Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica:
> jaegerandi
> > >  >    SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> > >  >     GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
> > >  >         HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> > >  >      GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563CC272
> A126
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  > _______________________________________________
> > >  > Openstack-i18n mailing list
> > >  > Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
> > >  > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
> >    SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> >     GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
> >         HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> >      GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-i18n mailing list
> Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20150919/2f50f18d/attachment.html>