Open Stack

One thing to note is that each language team would like to discuss in its
language in most cases.
We don't want to use English in translation discussion :p
Thus I think this mailing does not work to address the original question.

In Japanese case, we use a mailing list in the local community,
but not all language team has such media and they might had Transifex
messaging to communicate each other.

2015-09-17 22:50 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com>:

> On 2015-09-17 15:19, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2015-09-17 07:58:39 -0500 (-0500), Douglas Fish wrote:
>>
>>> Can't the openstack-i18n mailing list be used for this? In the
>>> openstack-dev lists multiple teams use it and we just include [horizon]
>>> or
>>> [keystone] or similar as appropriate to help sort out messages to
>>> interested parties.
>>>
>>> The nice thing about this is that it makes the discussion open to others
>>> who might take interest periodically.
>>>
>>
>> Not only that, the discussion is also archived and accessible
>> anonymously over the Web. Any group contact mechanism built into
>> Zanata as an afterthought is going to be inferior to proper mailing
>> lists as a general discussion platform.
>>
>>
> Challenge is that not every translator is subscribed here AFAIU. How can
> we encourage usage of this mailing list?
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-i18n mailing list
> Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20150917/8edca89e/attachment.html>