Open Stack

Thank you for asking, Anne.

Based on my observation, the translation progress will probably 
decrease from 100% to 60%~70% , after "API Quick Start" changes into RST.
If translators want to keep up with 100% progress, we have to manually 
restore the translations from translation memory, making some small 
changes.
So from a translator's point of view, I don't like the format change, 
especially 
pure format changing without any special purposes.

As to the tool chain support, Andreas has announced the translation of the 
RST Install 
Guides and the draft publish. So I think, it could prove that the tool 
chain support for RST is OK.
Your opinion, Andreas ?

Best regards
Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)


Anne Gentle <annegentle at justwriteclick.com> wrote on 09/02/2015 11:02:55 
AM:

> From: Anne Gentle <annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
> To: "openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org" 
<openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 09/02/2015 11:03 AM
> Subject: [Openstack-i18n] API Quick Start
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I've got a patch in progress to convert the "API Quick Start" from 
> Docbook to RST: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217467/
> 
> Since it has quite a few translations completed, I want to make sure
> that converting that document is okay with the translators. 
> 
> So, is it okay to convert and build using RST instead of Docbook? Is
> the tooling available for files in the api-site repository? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Anne
> -- 
> Anne Gentle
> Rackspace
> Principal Engineer
> www.justwriteclick.com_______________________________________________
> Openstack-i18n mailing list
> Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20150902/4cb3e07a/attachment.html>