Open Stack

> On 2015-11-25 15:48, KATO Tomoyuki wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 25 Nov 2015, at 03:41, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo at dream.daynight.jp> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> My idea at now is to use "code-block" directive as possible as we can,
> >>>
> >>> As far as I know, docs team guides mainly use "code-block".
> >>> So, I'm okay to unify to "code-block" directive.
> >>>
> >>>> but I am not sure it is the right direction as "::" is widely used.
> >>>
> >>> In my understand, most of developers like “::”, which is simple RST format :)
> >>
> >> Maybe we could add a gate check that looks for “::” in the end of the strings (original and translated)? It would enable developers to use whatever they are used to.
> > 
> > Nice idea! Sounds good to me, as a non-vote job.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > KATO Tomoyuki
> 
> But who will monitor this and correct it?
> 
> We already see warnings in translated code that everybody ignores, let's
> find a good way to monitor and fix these problems first before we add
> more tests...

When I heard the idea, I thinked it's a job, like "checkniceness-2",
that simply checks syntax of the code, not a job builds translated documents.
So, the patch submitter and reviewers can easily check the result.

For example, when FAIL(non-voting),

 Line xx: found the usge of :: directive,
 This style is harded for translators to traslate than code-block.
 We recommend use code-block directive instead of :: directive....

KATO

> 
> Andreas
> -- 
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> 
>