> On 25 Nov 2015, at 03:41, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo at dream.daynight.jp> wrote: > >> My idea at now is to use "code-block" directive as possible as we can, > > As far as I know, docs team guides mainly use "code-block". > So, I'm okay to unify to "code-block" directive. > >> but I am not sure it is the right direction as "::" is widely used. > > In my understand, most of developers like “::”, which is simple RST format :) Maybe we could add a gate check that looks for “::” in the end of the strings (original and translated)? It would enable developers to use whatever they are used to. Matjaz >> Thought? >> >> Thanks, >> Akihiro >> >> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/source-code.html >> [2] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/source-code.html#standard-literal-block >> [3] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/index.html#search-in-this-guide > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-docs mailing list > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs