Open Stack

Hello Andreas,

I am copying & pasting from Andreas's comment to this thread:

+++
"Sorry, let me clarify this again:
* ATC is one year (voting rights for i18n)
* Free passes for OpenStack conference is 6 months

For ATC, you could take a one time snapshot as well now - going back to 
1st of April, instead of saving it for later,"


=> Thank you so much for your nice clarification on ATC status and 
summit free passes.

We would vote this issue (removing on Transifex site) on today's IRC 
meeting, and yes.
We need contribution statistics data from Transifex, and I agree that
we can query and save Transifex statistics data (from April 1 2015 to 
now) and later
we would merge this data with Zanata statistics data on next April.

And I am not sure exactly, but we might use openstack/i18n repo to store 
Transfex related data
into a specific branch, not a master branch.


With many thanks,

/Ian


Ying Chun Guo wrote on 12/17/2015 1:21 AM:
> If we don't need the contribution data in Transifex, I think we could 
> remove it.
>
> As to the back up, it's a personal habit. I just want to keep it as 
> the history.
> I will use a repo in github to store the documents, including an Excel 
> file with the contribution statistic data.
>
> Best regards
> Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
>
>
> -----Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote: -----
>
> >To: "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi at gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi at gmail.com>>, 
> Robert Simai
> ><robert.simai at suse.com <mailto:robert.simai at suse.com>>
> >From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com>>
> >Date: 12/16/2015 09:59PM
> >Cc: openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> >Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex
> >
> >On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
> >>> Hello Robert,
> >>>
> >>> As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6
> >UTC),
> >>> we discussed this issue.
> >>>
> >>> During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to
> >Transifex
> >>> statistics data
> >>> is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release,
> >Mitaka.
> >>
> >> ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current
> >release,
> >> so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active
> >in
> >> Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka,
> >there's
> >> no need to query transifex IMO.
> >>
> >> Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed,
> >
> >See
> >https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstac
> >k-summit/
> >with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was cut-off-date),
> >
> >Andreas
> >--
> > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com <mailto:aj@%7Bsuse.com>,opensuse.org} 
> Twitter: jaegerandi
> > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
> > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272
> >A126
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Openstack-i18n mailing list
> >Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:Openstack-i18n at lists.openstack.org>
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
> >
> >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/attachments/20151217/47e21c93/attachment-0001.html>