> On Jul 10, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) <gergely.csatari at nokia.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > As is was commented in [1] with the Pike doc folder structure there is no more need for a separate cookiecutter for the install guide. > > Does anyone have problems if I : > Upgrade the project cookiecutter [2] with the folder structure defined in the Pike docs migration spec [3] > Update the Install guide part of the Docs contributor guide [4] and remove the references to the installguide-cookiecutter > > Any objections or ideas what to do differently? > > Thanks, > Gerg0 > > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481642/ <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481642/> > [2]: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/cookiecutter/ <https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/cookiecutter/> > [3]: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html <https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html> > [4]: https://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/project-install-guide.html <https://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/project-install-guide.html> This sounds like a good plan. You could also apply the retirement process to the install guide cookiecutter repository (https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html?#retiring-a-project <https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html?#retiring-a-project>). Could you add a note about this task to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/doc-future-problems <https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/doc-future-problems> under the “For the docs team” section? Thank you for taking this on! Doug -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20170710/4426fddd/attachment.html>