[OpenStack-docs] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com
Wed Apr 12 06:55:11 UTC 2017


I propose that we EOL the mitaka branch of openstack-manuals together
with all the other projects,

Andreas


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:47:25 +1000
From: Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>

Hi all,
    I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several
projects
have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to
apply the tag.

I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet one or more of the following
criteria:

- The project is openstack-dev/devstack, openstack-dev/grenade or
  openstack/requirements
- The project has the 'check-requirements' job listed as a template in
  project-config:zuul/layout.yaml
- The project gates with either devstack or grenade jobs
- The project is listed in governance:reference/projects.yaml and is tagged
  with 'stable:follows-policy'.

Some statistics:
All Repos                      : 1584 (covered in zuul/layout.yaml)
Checked Repos                  :  416 (match one or more of the above
criteria)
Repos with mitaka branches     :  409
EOL Repos                      :  199 (repos that match the criteria
*and* have
                                       a mitaka branch) [1]
NOT EOL Repos                  :  210 (repos with a mitaka branch but
                                       otherwise do not match) [2]
DSVM Repos (staying)           :   68 (repos that use dsvm but don't have
                                       mitaka branches)
Tagged Repos                   :    0
Open Reviews                   :  159 (reviews to close)

Please look over both lists by 2017-04-17 00:00 UTC and let me know if:
- A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of
EOLing and
  why.  Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage you
  have in the gate.
- A project is in list 2 that would like to opt *IN* to tagging/EOLing

Any projects that will be EOL'd will need all open reviews abandoned
before it
can be processed.  I'm very happy to do this, or if I don't have
permissios to
do it ask a gerrit admin to do it.

Yours Tony.

[1]
https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/c99e62bf8da19380e4eb130be8783be7#file-mitaka_eol_data-txt-L1
[2]
https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/c99e62bf8da19380e4eb130be8783be7#file-mitaka_eol_data-txt-L209


-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

-------------- next part --------------
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


More information about the OpenStack-docs mailing list