Open Stack

On 04/28/2016 02:14 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com
> <mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 04/28/2016 12:05 PM, Lana Brindley wrote:
>
>         On 28/04/16 11:59, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
>             On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Christian Berendt
>             <christian at berendt.io <mailto:christian at berendt.io>
>             <mailto:christian at berendt.io <mailto:christian at berendt.io>>>
>             wrote:
>
>                   On 28 April 2016 at 11:51:16, Andreas Jaeger
>             (aj at suse.com <mailto:aj at suse.com> <mailto:aj at suse.com
>             <mailto:aj at suse.com>>(mailto:aj at suse.com
>             <mailto:aj at suse.com> <mailto:aj at suse.com
>             <mailto:aj at suse.com>>)) wrote:
>
>                   > Does anybody see problems with that? Otherwise let's
>             do that before we
>                   > tackle the rest of the RST conversion.
>
>                   Makes sense to me. What about the other guides?
>
>                   Should we discuss to move all guides (over the
>             migration to RST) into the openstack-manuals repository? I
>             do not know why we have decided in the past to create
>             separate repositories for some of the guides.
>
>
>             It was for enabling review teams who knew the content best.
>             This model still makes sense for security guide to me. I'm
>             fine with the Ops Guide going back into openstack-manuals
>             but do check with anyone who has +2 specifically on the
>             separate repo please.
>
>
>         Yeah, Security Guide needs to stay in its own repo because it
>         has different reviewing rules and needs to maintain its own core
>         team. I've got no problem with the others moving if it's
>         possible to do so, though.
>
>
>
>     So, only other repo to merge then would be api-site with:
>     * content for developer.openstack.org <http://developer.openstack.org>
>     * API guide
>     * first-app
>
>     We can do that if desired,
>
>
> No, let's leave it. It's a different set of contributors based on
> looking at last two releases.

Ok, let's do only operations-guide, here's a change:

  https://review.openstack.org/310896

I'll mark it as WIP to give some more time for discussion...

Once that's in, we can finish the RST conversion of the guide - and 
remove the content from operations-guide.

I suggest to make operations-guide repository as read-only after that, 
let's not merge anything to DocBook, let's finish ops-guide RST conversion,

Andreas
-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126