[OpenStack-docs] Style Question for Project Names
APlimpton
aplimpton at gmail.com
Fri May 29 21:36:46 UTC 2015
I see several people are fine with how the convention is and would prefer
for it to remain as is because they do not see a need for the change.
Because I do see a need, the burden is on me to further explain what I’m
seeing and why it suggests that using a capital letter with the project
names is needed.
When I say inconsistencies I mean that a handful of the OpenStack
documentation manuals and a few wiki pages use the lowercase. On all other
guides, references, manuals, websites, pages, blogs and various other
communications the capitalized letter is used by the community (OpenStack
and general). This strong majority of people using the capitalized version
indicates that there has been a shift in the usage and we should update our
convention accordingly.
This is supported by the fact that these project names are names/proper
nouns and as such should be capitalized. Having the release code names
capitalized but not the project code names is inconsistent. If the name is
to be a proper noun w/ all lowercase then all sentences that start with the
project name will need to be reworded (source: IBM Style Guide used per the
Conventions wiki page).
An additional benefit to using the initial uppercase with project names is
that it helps reduce confusion. Each project uses the project name three
distinct ways with the exact same case. The project name, the CLI name and
the command that is used. For example: nova, nova, nova. As a component of
the project, the CLI name and the command should be lowercase (source: IBM
Style Guide). Using a capitalized letter with the project name immediately
distinguishes it as being not the project component and helps make sentence
creation and updating less convoluted.
If this makes sense to most of you and the consensus is reached to change
to the initial uppercase I will be happy to find and make those changes. If
the consensus is to keep it all lowercase then I’ll go ahead and attempt
correction for the majority of docs, which will take a little longer. If
keeping all lowercase, it may also be a good idea to remind the other
contributors about the conventions page so they will be aware in the
future. Either way I am believer in consistency and clarity. :)
Thanks,
Amanda
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Shilla Saebi <shilla.saebi at gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 29, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Christian Berendt <christian at berendt.io>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/29/2015 09:40 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> We're following the current convention for some time already and I see
> >> no reason to change, let's keep the current convention. If there're
> >> problems, let's fix them...
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Christian Berendt
> > Cloud Computing Solution Architect
> > Mail: berendt at b1-systems.de
> >
> > B1 Systems GmbH
> > Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
> > GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150529/9e5f1bf0/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-docs
mailing list