Open Stack

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/2015 10:55 PM, Lana Brindley wrote:
>
>> I’m fine with this approach. Is the issue happening in other Guides as
>> well?
>>
>
> This is specific to RST.
>
> Separating the two guides this way allows us some nice cleanup, I wonder
> why we didn't do it initially;). It's now easier to maintain,


We did it initially to prove we could have conditional inclusions at the
file level.

Now, what I'm not sure of is: have we proven Sphinx doesn't handle
conditional inclusions as we'd expect? That certainly is a consideration
for the next RST migrations.

Anne


>
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150513/e72ba374/attachment.html>