Open Stack

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Olga Gusarenko <ogusarenko at mirantis.com> wrote:
> 
> Guys, I have problems with my patches that refer to playground admin user guide. There are probably issues with scopes.
> Here is the link to one of my commits: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166786
> It could not pass the doc-public-checkbuild test (though the build was successful locally) until I marked the files with ":scope: docs_for_admin" (and not "admin_only" as it is stated in the migration conventions).
> BUT now the files are not included to the guide built by Jenkins. 
> 
> What should I do in this case? What`s the plan for combining end-user and admin-user guides?

Andreas and I are working on a solution with this patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166869/

More eyes would be great while we look for a solution.
Thanks, 
Anne


> 
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Olga Gusarenko <ogusarenko at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> Hi to all!
>> 
>> While working on the Admin User Guide migration, I have mentioned that the files marked as 'admin_only'  are not built by Jenkins. I can build it only locally by passing 
>> 
>> $ sphinx-build -t admin_only doc/playground-user-guide/source/ doc/playground-user-guide/build/html/
>> 
>> Is it planned to fix this? Or am I missing something and it is built and can be viewed when merged?
>> 
>> Thanks for the answer in advance!
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Olga
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150324/ec698f38/attachment.html>