Open Stack

I know I'm a little late on this but if no final verdict has been pitched
yet. Please consider this if it has not already been ruled out.

I'm personally a big fan of the idea of making the names a little shorter
and having them be just the repo without things like "family, based, repos,
etc..".

Something like say.
(file_ubuntu, file_rhel, file_suse)

If the docs are known to work with more than one set distro like say RHEL
and CentOS maybe something like this.
(file_rhel_centos, file_rhel_cent)

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:03 AM, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo at dream.daynight.jp>
wrote:

> How about using OpenStack repository names?
> ubuntu_repos, rdo_repos, obs_repos(suse_repos?)
>
> KATO Tomoyuki
>
> > I still don't like any terms that make our audience think we support more
> > than an explicit set of distributions. To Andreas' concern, we can most
> > likely combine RHEL/CentOS/Scientific/Fedora into one conditional (Redhat
> > or RH), SLES and openSUSE into another conditional (SUSE), and use notes
> > for the handful of differences among the variants.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Christian Berendt <christian at berendt.io
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/16/2015 08:40 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > >
> > >> What about using "like" or "family" or something instead of based? I
> > >> fear based is the wrong connotation,
> > >>
> > >
> > > ubuntu_family, fedora_family, opensuse_family
> (${distribution_name}_family)
> > >
> > > Makes sense to me.
> > >
> > > Christian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>



-- 
Emett Speer
Email: Speer.Emett at gmail.com
Phone: 778-321-4074
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150705/7b484504/attachment.html>