Open Stack

I tried uploading them to the wiki, but it only accepts a few file types
(not including zip either). I still think we need a safe, accessible place
for them with some sort of version control.

On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 3:55:52 AM Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:

> On 03/12/14 03:58, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Christian Berendt
> > <berendt at b1-systems.de <mailto:berendt at b1-systems.de>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 11/28/2014 03:46 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> >     > rather straightforward. As for .graffle files in the repo, I would
> like
> >     > to store them somewhere because a lot of people appear to use
> >     > OmniGraffle and those files contain metadata that improves
> efficiency
> >     > over SVGs.
> >
> >     I think that it is not correct to use proprietary software running
> on a
> >     proprietary operating system generating proprietary source files to
> >     create graphics for the OpenStack documentation. There is usable open
> >     source software to create graphics (like inkscape) and I think such
> >     software should be used and has to be used.
> >
> >
> > I know this sentiment runs deep in open source communities. I support
> > the spirit but won't enforce in practice other than to ensure open
> > formats are in our repo to ensure we're enabling correct licensing of
> > the content.
> >
> > For the Ops Guide, we don't use Adobe Illustrator for example, but the
> > source from O'Reilly is .ai files. However we don't have those source
> > files and have been editing png and svg in the community. I think there
> > are similarities here.
> >
> > I think it makes sense to upload CC licensed images to the wiki, as done
> > for https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icons where there are eps, svg, and
> > png.
> > I also think that it's not crucial that graffle files or ai files are
> > uploaded anywhere.
> >
> > Generally we should document our approach to images, and it should
> > include a priority towards open source, but a higher priority towards
> > licensing than tooling.
> > Just my current thinking, feel free to persuade me for another line.
> > Thanks,
> > Anne
>
> Necro-posting here, but what should become of this review, which deletes
> all graffle files
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137783/
>
> ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150106/71f102ad/attachment.html>