Open Stack

On 18/02/15 13:35, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Lana Brindley
> <openstack at lanabrindley.com <mailto:openstack at lanabrindley.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 18/02/15 13:19, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
>         On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Sriram Subramanian
>         <sriram at sriramhere.com <mailto:sriram at sriramhere.com>
>         <mailto:sriram at sriramhere.com <mailto:sriram at sriramhere.com>>__>
>         wrote:
>
>              Who chooses the persons to be represented?
>
>              On 17 Feb, 2015 5:34 pm, "Lana Brindley"
>         <openstack at lanabrindley.com <mailto:openstack at lanabrindley.com>
>              <mailto:openstack at __lanabrindley.com
>         <mailto:openstack at lanabrindley.com>>> wrote:
>
>                  I agree!
>
>                  L
>
>                  On 17/02/15 20:22, Christian Berendt wrote:
>
>                      We display several superuser graphics on d.o.o. showing
>                      OpenStack Operators.
>
>                      I think we should add several well known OpenStack
>                      Developers and
>                      OpenStack Consumers, we do not only focus on
>         operations.
>
>
>         Sure, I've gotten this input from other places. Also there's quite a
>         demand for people who want to be one of those avatars.
>
>         There's a limit to the ones that have been created for that
>         particular
>         design -- in Portland they were community members (Thierry and I for
>         example) and in Atlanta they were operators. I don't know of
>         others but
>         we can ask the Foundation.
>
>         As to "who chooses" it really was the Foundation who had needs for
>         Summit thematic banners and so they commissioned their
>         designers. We can
>         ask for more representation but honestly I'm not sure of the
>         criteria
>         we'd use for "who" other than "more than operators." So if
>         people like
>         Thierry and I are okay then we can use those when we get copies
>         from the
>         Foundation.
>
>
>     I guess if there's the option to get more done, then we could go
>     with "community leaders" which would include PTLs and Cores, I
>     guess. However, if we have to run with what already exists, can we
>     just ask for all of them?
>
>
> Sure, I'll see what exists, many are generic nameless ones if I remember
> right, do we want those?
>

I'd be cool with it, especially if it increases the diversity of the images.

L

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com