Open Stack

Roger,

I agree with you on this point! This usecase is not exactly useful, we might
want to reconsider a private cloud deployed on trainers laptop which is being
shared with the users who do not have machines good enough to run the cluster.

Regards,
Pranav

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 10:26 +0100, Roger Luethi wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:10:19 -0800, sean roberts wrote:
> > - public infra version of the trainer cluster
> 
> We have already identified a number of issues that will likely limit 
> the
> usefulness of such a version. The proposed spec has more information:
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137299/
> 
> Before embarking on such an adventure, we would need good answers to 
> at
> least these questions:
> 
> a) Is there a need for this? How many trainees have access to 
> hardware
>    that cannot run the training-cluster itself but can interact with 
> a
>    node VM in a public cloud?
> 
> b) Which features of the training cluster need to work in the public
>    infra version? Are the trainees just going to play with the 
> dashboard,
>    or will they have a shell in the node VM and expect to find the
>    exact environement of the training cluster?
> 
> > - integration of the trainer cluster into other docs
> 
> I don't understand what that means. Can you elaborate?
> 
> Roger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs