Open Stack

On 04/17/2015 06:06 AM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> I think the titles should all use scenario.


Let's review and discuss at this patch which goes to architecture:
https://review.openstack.org/174737

I'm fine either way but let's be consistent,

Andreas

> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com
> <mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote:
>
>     I'm a bit confused about the titles.
>
>     The current checked-in source mainly use "architecture", the TOC at
>     https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NetworkingGuide/TOC uses scenario.
>
>     Which one is it?
>
>     I can send a patch to clean it up but need to know what convention
>     you follow,
>
>     Andreas
>     --
>       Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com <http://suse.com>,opensuse.org
>     <http://opensuse.org>} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>        SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>         GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
>             Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>          GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272
>     A126
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-docs mailing list
>     OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>


-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
        Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126