On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Steve Gordon <sgordon at redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Christian Berendt" <christian at berendt.io> > > To: "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" < > Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org> > > > > In our conventions > > (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions) we have a > > "list of project names and their official names and capitalization". > > > > On what source this list is based on? > > > > In > > > https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/projects.yaml > > for trove it is "Database service", in our convention we have "Database > > Service". For ironic is is "Bare metal service", in our convention we > > have "Bare metal module". > > > > Christian. > > Not sure about Trove but with regards to Ironic I suspect that naming in > our conventions is based on the pre-integration naming. That is, Ironic has > been integrated since that was originally written resulting in the name > changing. > > Yes. When I review those changes I also give it a "doc test" as in, can you document it with the proposed name. See Congress recently for an example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169480/ Anne > Thanks, > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-docs mailing list > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs > -- Anne Gentle annegentle at justwriteclick.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20150414/9640fb5e/attachment.html>