[Openstack-docs] Key or option in configuration files?

Matt Kassawara mkassawara at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 13:46:46 UTC 2014


Do we also prefer <option> over <literal> for them?

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:
>
>> Reviewing
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122027/
>>
>> I noticed the usage of "key" but I see "option" used in other guides
>> when changing configuration files.
>>
>> Example:
>> 1) "Set auth_uri key to..."
>> 2) "Set auth_uri option to..."
>>
>> Is there a preferred way or is this something we use interchangeable?
>>
>>
> I'd prefer we stick to the option term consistently (even if it's a key
> that goes into that option).
>
>
>> Andreas
>> --
>>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
>>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>>    GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140917/4ab9f35a/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack-docs mailing list