[Openstack-docs] Is comment about active/active RabbitMQ config still a valid concern?
Chris Friesen
chris.friesen at windriver.com
Wed Sep 10 17:43:16 UTC 2014
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the recommended configuration for RabbitMQ for
use by OpenStack.
At
"http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/s-rabbitmq.html"
it says,
"There is an alternative method of configuring RabbitMQ for high
availability. That approach, known as active-active mirrored queues,
happens to be the one preferred by the RabbitMQ developers—however it
has shown less than ideal consistency and reliability in OpenStack
clusters. Thus, at the time of writing, the Pacemaker/DRBD based
approach remains the recommended one for OpenStack environments,
although this may change in the near future as RabbitMQ active-active
mirrored queues mature."
In the same document at
"http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_configure_rabbitmq.html"
it has instructions on how to configure rabbitmq as active/active with
mirrored queues.
Is the comment about active/standby being preferred still current or is
it stale?
Which is the recommended configuration?
Thanks,
Chris
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list