Open Stack

Not hearing anything...

On Tue Nov 18 2014 at 4:12:23 PM Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

>
> On 11/11/2014 09:23 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote:
> > I'm seeing some bugs pop up for the Debian variant of the Juno
> > installation guide that merely add to the list of existing open bugs
> > from prior releases. Considering the bugs and installation testing
> > status page [1], I don't see any attempts to test and/or maintain this
> > variant. The Debian packages use debconf, a configuration system that
> > requires un-translatable screen shots to configure services. However,
> > some items still require manually editing configuration files. Also,
> > Debian receives minimal readership compared to other distributions which
> > reduces the return on investment to maintain a system different from any
> > other distribution. I brought this issue up several weeks ago and
> > thought we wanted to pursue disabling debconf to make Debian mostly
> > follow Ubuntu and therefore easier to maintain. Any alternative
> > installation processes using debconf and/or automation would reside
> > outside of the official installation guide. Did we reach an agreement?
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/JunoDocTesting
>
> Let's add Thomas explicitly to this thread.
>
> I agree with Jeremy - Debian uses debconf, so if the description is not
> covering debconf, we have to explain how to disable the use of debconf.
> So, this looks odd to me. Do we have better options?
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF:Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20141125/05a0914b/attachment.html>