Open Stack

+1

I love part of it.

F
On May 29, 2014 9:56 AM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sean Roberts, Stefano and I just had a very fruitful discussion regarding
> the training manuals project.
>
> We think that it's time to allow the the training guides to become a
> free-standing project of its own accord, and start attracting significantly
> more people around it.
>
> This will make it easier for contributors who just want to work on
> training to find the project, see lists of bugs and tasks relevant to
> them*, and also provide a clearer pathway toward becoming contributors, and
> eventually core reviewers.
>
> It will also enable the training guides project to have its own policies,
> and allow the repository to be used for investigation of training
> infrastructure, such as the recent forays into moodle for example.
>
> However, with every change such as this, there are drawbacks, and so we
> feel it's important to discuss these as well - and most importantly get
> your input.
>
> For example, while we can continue to re-use tools and content, this would
> mean a different review queue and repository - which could frustrate if you
> are working across both projects.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> * as opposed to the 400 odd in the openstack-manuals tracker!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140529/073f7580/attachment.html>