Open Stack

Le 2014-05-15 18:08, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
> On 05/15/2014 11:48 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> On 15/05/14 11:40, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I guess I should have asked this during this morning's doc session 
>>> at
>>> the summit, but I hadn't had real coffee yet (only decaf!).
>>> 
>>> How do we handle backports reviews? Is one +2 enough (that's what
>>> Andreas used to do during the post havana backport storm)? Is self
>>> approval a valid option?
>>> 
>>> I'd like to hear what you guys think.
>> 
>> IMO: one sanity-check +2 from someone who is not the submitter
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Also, backports should not be edited, if there are problems noticed, 
> we
> should do a patch for master to fix those and backport that one,

Sounds good to me. Thanks for the feedback!

I guess that we could add that info to the upcoming review guide :)

Gauvain