[Openstack-docs] Consistency for "titles" in lists?
Anne Gentle
anne at openstack.org
Fri May 2 19:24:55 UTC 2014
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:
> On 05/02/2014 07:53 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>> I looked up Rackspace style and for a list that provides terms and more
>> information that is not meant to be marked up as a variable list, it's:
>>
>> term space emdash space definition phrase period
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> * *Public* – This setting allows any two servers with public IP
>>
>> addresses to be load balanced. These can be nodes outside of the
>> Rackspace network, but if they are, standard bandwidth rates apply.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to have someone at RedHat look up their style guide and let us
>> know.
>>
>
> For the Operations Guide, we used - as specified by O'Reilly's guide - no
> spaces around the emdashes.
>
>
Technical these examples ARE variable lists and O'Reilly's style wants it
written as such.
http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000969/ch02.html#variable_list
Frequently, bulleted lists should be converted to variable lists. Any
bulleted list whose entries consist of a short term and its definition
should be converted. For example, the following bulleted list entries:
- Spellchecking: process of correcting spelling
- Pagebreaking—process of breaking pages
should be variable list entries:
SpellcheckingProcess of correcting spelling PagebreakingProcess of breaking
pages
>
> What does the Rackspace guide say about the markup for term? Is it
> emphasis in "bold"?
No additional markup for the term.
>
>
> Ideally we'll be able to answer these if Rackspace or RedHat gets their
>> style guide externalized so we can look it up.
>>
>
>
> Andreas
>
> Thanks,
>> Anne
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com
>> <mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I've seen various forms used during reviews in lists with many items:
>>
>> 1)
>> <listitem><para><guilabel>Boot from image</guilabel>—If you
>> choose
>> ...
>>
>> 2) And also:
>> <listitem>
>> <para><code>scheduler_filter___classes</code> - Specifies the list
>>
>> of filter
>>
>> And then the usage of
>> 3) <formalpara> with <title>,
>>
>> 4) ":" instead of —,
>> 5) &ndash or "-"
>>
>> I've seen recently some patches using the first variant but there's
>> a lot of variations. Do we want to have a consistent style for new
>> changes? And which one?
>>
>> This was triggered by reviewing https://review.openstack.org/__91736
>> <https://review.openstack.org/91736>,
>> https://review.openstack.org/__90625
>>
>> <https://review.openstack.org/90625> and then editing
>> config-reference/compute/__section_compute-cells.xml
>>
>> Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com <http://suse.com>,opensuse.org
>> <http://opensuse.org>} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>>
>> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>> GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG
>> Nürnberg)
>> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272
>> A126
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>> Openstack-docs at lists.__openstack.org
>> <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__
>> openstack-docs
>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140502/0747ccf7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list