Open Stack

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 06/27/2014 02:40 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sean Roberts <seanrob at yahoo-inc.com
> > <mailto:seanrob at yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Having many sub-directories follows the docs layout because of the
> >     different repos. If we go that way then we would need to treat each
> >     project directory separate with their own release directories like
> >     /doc-spec/training-guides/juno
> >
> >     The drawback will be that this makes finding approved specs
> >     difficult. The other projects are using the single /specs directory
> >     with a flat naming scheme like ml2-dell-afc-mech-driver.rst.
> >
> >     For specs that overlay projects like install-guides and
> >     training-guides, it will be confusing which, what, where. Because of
> >     this I vote for this structure
> >
> >     doc-spec -
> >     specs -
> >     juno - (all docs program juno cycle RST reside here)
> >     tests -
> >     doc -
> >
> >
> >
> > Yep, looks like that's the accepted structure.
> >
> > Here's the starting openstack-infra/config patch:
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/103115
> >
> > and I'll populate the repo with this repo:
> >
> > https://github.com/annegentle/docs-specs
>
>
> That repo contains many references to Glance - do you want to update it
> first or do this later?
>

Updating now.


>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140627/492fc265/attachment.html>