Open Stack

On 06/03/2014 10:22 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 02:47 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> I've took the time to review the distribution specific parts in a bit
>> more detail.
>>
>> Looking at the Image Service example, it's basically really only this
>> section which is completely different:
>>
>> On 06/02/2014 05:46 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Another example. See this (from the Ubuntu guide):
>>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt/content/glance-install.html
>>>
>>> and now see this (from the Debian guide):
>>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt-debian/content/glance-install.html
>>
>> And this is different from all other distributions, Debian is the odd
>> one out.
> 
> Yeah!

;)

>> Looking at the description for me it's not so much that Debian
>> is using a different tool - it's a complete different way of describing
>> it. While for the non-Debian distros, we explicitly document which
>> variables to set, I see here "Respond to prompts" without any guidance
>> on what to answer - and that means to me what you document is a
>> different kind of guide then what we describe. Looking at the
>> screenshot, the non-Debian guides would write something like:
>> "Respond the pipeline question with 'keystone'".
>>
>> And that's for me the question - are we working on the same kind of guide?
> 
> I agree with this. I believe there should be more explanation of what
> directive is edited by responding to the prompts. If you let me, I'll
> add that in the Debian doc.

Great, will review happily ;)

>> Thomas, btw. I think part of this is also triggered by comments like you
>> do in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97156/. I do have added you as
>> reviewer in the past to several patches and sometimes didn't get a
>> review in a timely manner. We work on a best effort base and many of us
>> on a volunteer base - like you - and while I understand your some of
>> your frustration, such comments might lead some to not review your
>> patches at all,
>>
>> Andreas
> 
> Andreas, I'm sorry if you feel bad about the patch comment. I thought
> what happened was a mistake, and lots of what I did for Havana went
> away. It as a bit frustrating for me, which lead to that text. Though:
> 
> "It'd be nice if I didn't have to do such work again in the future (eg:
> if reviewers took care of not having these get in again)."
> 
> is IMO written in a nice way. It's "it'd be nice if", not "WTF did the
> reviewer"... So please don't take it as badness, it's just a bit of
> frustration on my side.

Ok, understood.

> Also, you must know that I appreciated a lot all the time you spent
> reviewing my patches. Which is why I was so happy to see you in Atlanta.
> I felt regret I didn't spend enough time with you and had no opportunity
> to drink a beer with you to say thank you. I hope we'll met again in
> Paris, and this time, I'll make sure to spend enough time with the doc
> team! :)

Yeah, Atlanta was too short in some ways, I would have loved to chat a
bit more with you as well.

> Last thing: I think I did a few review. If I missed some, then please
> forgive me. Please add me again on reviews, and I'll do my best to find
> the time to do the work.

Ok, will try to add you again to reviews if I think those affect Debian,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126