[OpenStack-docs] [training-guides] Criteria for core reviewership
Tom Fifield
tom at openstack.org
Sun Dec 14 23:59:09 UTC 2014
On 14/12/14 23:04, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org
> <mailto:frans at meruvian.org>> wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> has been months
>
> i am working with training guide and installation guide and now the
> training lab
>
> i wish we /can have dedicated mailing list to ask this question
>
> and i am planing roadshows to school showing this material, and let
> students work and try this.
>
> the training lab concept is more easier to anyone to start rather the
> installation guide
>
>
> can we have a training at list.openstack.org
> <mailto:training at list.openstack.org> or education at list.openstack.org
> <mailto:education at list.openstack.org>?
>
Hi Frans,
I think the appropriate list for this would be
community at lists.openstack.org , as it is related to community events.
Regards,
Tom
>
> Hi Frans,
> I can see the need you have being slightly different from the people who
> are on the docs list.
>
> Let's see what community managers think.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> I still also confuse, if we make this event how it related to user
> group ( i cc the user group).
>
> because that i know, if we not have user group, the roadshow can
> become ilegal , because put openstack logo (cost $10.000/year)
>
> Frans
> --
> Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
> Shadow Master and Lead Investor
> Meruvian.
> Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider.
>
> Mobile: +628557888699 <tel:%2B628557888699>
> Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id)
>
> FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian
> TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / @meruvian
> Website: http://www.meruvian.org
>
> "We grow because we share the same belief."
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Roger Luethi
> <rl at patchworkscience.org <mailto:rl at patchworkscience.org>> wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:11:42 -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >> Oh definitely can +2 your own patches early on and with small
> teams. I
> >> still do so for API docs. It has only been this last year or so
> where I've
> >> gotten to the point where I get two others to +2 my patches in
> >> openstack-manuals.
> >
> > In that case requiring 2x +2 for non-trivial patches would
> formalize what
> > we've been doing pretty much since the repo existed. Fine, let's
> do it.
> >
> > Thanks for the explanations, Anne.
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-docs mailing list
> > OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-docs mailing list
> OpenStack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
More information about the OpenStack-docs
mailing list