[Openstack-docs] Markup : literal vs parameter/option, application/command and systemitem?
Andreas Jaeger
aj at suse.com
Sun Sep 29 07:50:13 UTC 2013
Reviewing manuals, I've noticed that we use for options, parameters and
commands different kind of markup in an inconsistent way.
It looks to me that we used <literal> initially for everything but newer
text introduces sometimes:
* parameter: Often for command line parameters
* option:
* application: Used for some commands
* commands: Use for command line tools
* systemitem: Used with attribute class="service" for OpenStack services
like nova-api
Our Conventions wiki page is not describing what to use when - and the
docbook description is vague as well.
I'd like to see our Conventions page updated as guidance - and suggest
to not force changing our current usage of <literal>.
Could you help me descripting when to use what?
Here's a first brief shot for discussion:
<literal> is the generic markup item for some literal value. If
appropriate, use the less generic <parameter>, <option>, <application>
<command> or <systemitem> markup.
<systemitem class="service"> is used to describe the OpenStack services.
Example: <systemitem class="service">nova-api</systemitem>
<application> is used to describe software packages.
Example: <application>RabbitMQ</application>
<command> is used to describe software commands.
<parameter> is used to describe parameters to software commands.
Example: <parameter>-l</paramater> of <command>ls</command>
<option> is used to describe options in the configuration files
Example: <option>backend</option> in file <filename>nova.conf</filename>
What's your understanding? Did I miss anything?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list