Open Stack

Hi everyone,

In preparation for next week, I've added several more draft (*early*
draft) personas to the Google Doc, and would love to get feedback and
discussion going on them.

Ideally, we would match these up against user survey results & feedback,
do some interviews to ensure we're not gone too far off track, and then
start applying the results to docs, user interface, marketing and even
development & feature planning.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/16rkiXWxxgzGT47_Wc6hzIPzO2-s2JWAPEKD0gP2mt7E/edit?usp=sharing

I would love to hear back from you all, and of course to see many of you
next Friday in my Personas presentation in Hong Kong.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 09/30/2013 06:05 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I meant to send this right after Dave sent it out, and now I figure,
> better late than never! He hasn't gotten any input from the user
> committee list, but perhaps the docs list would be interested in giving
> input. 
> 
> Thanks Bruce for putting them together, feel free to share your findings
> with the openstack-docs list as you get input.
> 
> Anne
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Dave Neary* <dneary at redhat.com <mailto:dneary at redhat.com>>
> Date: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:28 AM
> Subject: [User-committee] OpenStack personas (basis for further work)
> To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>"
> <user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, Bruce Reeler
> <breeler at redhat.com <mailto:breeler at redhat.com>>
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> A colleague of mine, Bruce Reeler, recently took a first shot at
> drafting some personas for OpenStack documentation inside Red Hat. With
> his permission, I'm sharing them here for comment and development.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16rkiXWxxgzGT47_Wc6hzIPzO2-s2JWAPEKD0gP2mt7E/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> I think that we need to have a bigger range of these to address
> different domains (scientific computing vs web application deployment,
> for example), geos (constraints you might encounter in China, Vietnam,
> etc), and activity types (for example, "developer" should cover DevOps,
> application developer, developer of OpenStack add-ons or extensions, and
> OpenStack core developer).
> 
> But I think these are a great start, and a good conversation starter.
> Thanks Bruce!
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 <tel:%2B33%209%2050%2071%2055%2062> / Cell: +33 6
> 77 01 92 13 <tel:%2B33%206%2077%2001%2092%2013>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13