Open Stack

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 11/26/2013 10:39 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > [...]
>
> > I've asked #openstack-infra for help and got pointers on how to request
> > a new repo - and since fungi was confused by "docutils" I took the
> > proposal from the etherpad and proposed "doctools". The patch is at:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58623/
> >
> > I created an initial repository consisting of all the content from the
> > tools subdirectory of openstack-manuals and pushed it to
> > https://github.com/ajaeger/doctools. Do you think that's the proper
> > initial layout and content? Or should I remove some more files?
>
> Two questions for all of you:
>
> * Is doctools the proper name for the repository?
> * Does the initial repository look fine?
>
> I'd like to move forward with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58623,
>
>
I reviewed and have a minor nit, but I also wonder if the clouddocs maven
plugin should be in the same repository? Will the same people be working on
all the tools or is the maven plugin outside enough to be in a standalone
directory? Thoughts?

Anne


> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20131127/07dbc23c/attachment.html>